Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub

How, and upon what principle, does the Almighty govern this world? Is it directly, by the operation of his arbitrary, supernatural, inscrutable will; or is it indirectly, by the operation of his invariable, natural, discoverable law; or can it be partly by the one, and partly by the other?

If, and to the extent to which we are governed by invariable laws, it must be most important that we should know them; and equally important is it that we should be instructed how to regulate our lives in accordance with their dictates.

Now, Science claims to be a revelation ;1 and none the less sacred that it has been a continuous disclosure, through the medium of man's natural intelligence, of the established order of the universe, and the method of the Divine government on Earth; and it is the faith of science that this world, so far as it can be comprehended by the human reason, is governed by God's natural laws.2 A faith, not exactly childlike, nor yet lacking reverence, and simple as that of

'The poor Indian, whose untutored mind

Sees God in clouds, or hears him in the wind.' 3

!

1 Herbert Spencer's First Principles, chap. i., 'Religion and Science,' sec. 6.

'Reason is natural revelation, whereby the eternal Father of Light and Fountain of all Knowledge communicates to mankind that portion of truth which he has laid within the reach of their natural faculties.'-Locke's Essay concerning Human Understanding, book iv. chap. xix, sec. 4.

2 That God governs the world by general fixed laws, and that he has endowed us with capacities of reflecting upon this constitu tion of things.'-Butler's Analogy of Religion, &c, part i, chap. iii., 'Of the Moral Government of God.'

3 Pope's Essay on Man, Ep. i. 99.

Science proclaims it to be her mission to teach a knowledge of these laws; and she offers for our examination overwhelming evidence in support of her faith.

Now, it is the aim and object of the Inductive Philosophy, planting her stand firmly on Science, to supply an intellectual method whereby we may learn how to harmonise the conduct of life with the sanctions of the natural laws.

The student of theology whose anxiety to arrive at truth may have led him to pursue his search after the origin of some dogma until he has succeeded in detecting it amidst the subtleties of the scholastic metaphysics of the middle ages, is aware that about the thirteenth century traces are to be met with of the germs of the inductive philosophy. In the intellectual contest that was then being carried on between the Nominalists and Realists, as they were barbarously termed, but which was a real struggle between reason and authority, he finds that, whilst on one side men were taught to distrust the evidence of the senses and conclusions from experience, they were, on the other side, led to think more for themselves, and examine their own convictions-to look to the external evidence by which assertions might be supported. It is, however, to our immortal countryman, Lord Bacon, that we must turn for the first complete exposition of that system of thought to which he gave the name Inductive Philosophy. It is, indeed, a prevailing popular opinion that Lord Bacon was its inventor or discoverer, and every student of his writings well knows with what

admirable precision and force he has explained and illustrated the inductive method of research; and the powerful impression which so masterly an analysis has made upon subsequent thinkers has undoubtedly contributed to sustain such prevailing opinion. It has also been popularly believed that Bacon was the first man who rose up against the philosophy of Aristotle when at the height of its power. Yet, strictly speaking, if there be any one who could rightly be regarded as the father of the inductive philosophy, it is Aristotle himself; for he it was who first conceived and announced its primary principle, proclaiming with a clearness never yet excelled, that facts derived from observation and experience were the only grounds of real knowledge; and that our ideas, even the most abstract, have their origin in our sensations;1 and a probable cause why the analytical and encyclopædic intellect of Aristotle never proceeded practically on the inductive method was owing to the physical sciences not being in existence, fitting instruments of research uninvented, and laws of nature nearly unknown. There was no sufficient field of experience to resort to, for the purpose either of generalising facts, or of verifying inductions by an appeal to experiment, the only means whereby hypothesis and theory can be efficiently tested. It is true, indeed, that the dialectical subtleties of the Schoolmen, which in Bacon's day tyrannised over the human mind, having been for the most part

.

1 See the passages from Aristotle's Works, supporting the statement in the text, collected in G. H. Lewes's 'Aristotle,' a chapter from the Hist. of Science, pp. 45-100; and Hist. of Philosophy, 'Aristotle's Method,' vol. i. pp. 284-296.

elaborated from or fortified by corrupt translations and vitiated versions of Aristotle's works, had come to be generally designated as the Aristotelian philosophy; a misnomer, however, inducing a profound and accurate scholar, the humane and accomplished Grotius, to declare that truth, in the service of which Aristotle had faithfully spent his life, suffered no oppression so great as that which was inflicted in Aristotle's name.'1 Yet Bacon's great merit rather lay in concentrating the few and scattered lights of his predecessors, reducing to rule what others had effected fortuitously, and fixing the world's attention on the distinguishing characteristics of true and false philosophy, by a felicity of illustration peculiar to himself, irradiated by the luminous power of his bold and figurative eloquence.

At the time when Bacon wrote, science, properly so called, was only in its dawn. Astronomy, now the queen of the inductive sciences, was gradually emerging from astrology; Gilbert was still experimenting on the singular properties of the magnet; Harvey was on the point of discovering the circulation of the blood; and Descartes was about to illumine the mathematical world by his brilliant discovery of the possibility of applying algebra to the geometry of curves,2 and his

1 Grotius, De Jure Belli ac Pacis, &c., proleg. sec. 43. 'Ita ut veritas, cui Aristoteles fidelem navavit operam, nulla jam rẻ magis opprimatur quam Aristotelis nomine.'

[ocr errors]

2 Descartes was the first who expressed curves by algebraic equations. Montucla, Hist. des Mathémat., vol. i. pp. 704, 705. A discovery which constitutes the greatest single step ever made in the progress of the exact sciences.'

J. S. Mill's Exam. of Sir W. Hamilton's Philosophy, pp. 531, 533, wherein is contained a very lucid explanation of the nature and practical application of this happy discovery of Descartes.

explanation of the true causes of the rainbow; but, so modern is the true scientific spirit, that no one, so far as is known, had, previously to Bacon's great contemporary Galileo, ever correctly observed the simple phenomena of a falling body; and it is interesting to remark, that it was Galileo's discovery,1 viz., that the velocity and the space traversed are proportioned, the one to the time and the other to its square, that paved the way for the grander discovery of gravitation by Sir Isaac Newton.

6

But Bacon had thought a good deal about philosophy, such as it then was, for, he observes: We must speak out plainly and declare that our philosophy, which we have derived principally from the Greeks, seems to be but a childhood of knowledge, apt for idle talk, but immature for generating anything: of controversies, rank and fertile, but of works barren and fruitless.' This opinion, by the way, of the practical worthlessness of the Greek Philosophy was not new, and perhaps even now it is not old. There may be some still ready to concur with Cicero in thinking that a single page of a Roman Jurist contains more solid and exact matter than whole libraries of the works of

2

4

1 Whewell's Hist. of the Inductive Sciences, vol. ii. p. 32, 2nd ed., 'Inductive epoch of Galileo.'

2 Instauratio Magna. Præfatio.

[ocr errors]

3 Dicam quod sentio : bibliothecas omnium philosophorum unus mihi videtur xii. tabularum libellus, si quis legum fontes et capita viderit, et auctoritatis pondere et utilitatis ubertate, superare.'-— Cic. De Oratore, i. 44.

[ocr errors]

4 Sparks from all the sciences are raked together in the ashes of the law.'-Law, or a Discourse thereof, by Sir Henry Finch, Knight, His Majesty's Serjeant-at-Law, book i. chap. iii., Henry Lintot, 1759.

C

« AnteriorContinuar »