Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

States should be found, laying and collecting taxes for the purpose of distributing them, when collected, among the States of the Union.

I do not think it difficult to account for the present overflowing condition of the Treasury. The Treasury enjoys two sources of income-the custom-house and the public lands. The income from the customs has been large, because the commerce of the country has been greatly extended, and its prosperity has been remarkable. The exports of the country have continued to increase. While the cotton crop has grown larger and larger from year to year, the price of cotton has still kept up. Notwithstanding all the apprehensions entertained by prudent and sagacious men to the contrary, the world has not become overstocked with this article. The increase of consumption seems to keep pace with the increase of supply. The consequence is, a vast and increasing export by us, and an import corresponding with this export, and with the amount of earnings in the carrying trade; since the general rule undoubtedly is, taking a number of years together, that the amount of imports, and the earnings of freights, are about equal to the amount of exports. The cotton fields of the South, most unquestionably, form a great part of the basis of our commerce, and the earnings of our nav. igation another.

[SENATE.

lowest price. Now, with the two ends of this line our manufacturers have not much to do: that is to say, they have not much to do with the production of the very highest, or the very lowest, of these articles. Generally speaking, they work in the intermediate space. It was along this space, along this part of the line of work, that the minimum principle, as it has been usually called, operated. It struck just where the great object of protection required it to strike, and it struck no where else. All the rest it left free. It wasted no power. It accomplished its object by the least possible expenditure of means. Its aim was levelled at a distinct and well-discerned object, and its aim was exact, and the object was

reached.

But the minimum had become the subject of obloquy and reproach. It was railed at even, in good set terms, by some who professed to be, and who doubtless were, friends of the protecting policy. It was declared to be deception. It was said that it cheated the people, inasmuch as under its operation they did not see what amount of taxes they really paid. For one, I did not admit the fact, nor yield to the argument. I had no doubt the people knew what taxes they paid under the operation of the laws, as well as we who passed the laws; and whether they stopped to make precise calculations or not, if they found the tax neither oppressive nor heavy, and the effect of the law decidedly salutary, I did not believe they would complain of it, unless it was made a part of some other controversy. The minimum principle, however, in its application to broadcloths, was overthrown by the law of 1832, and that law, as it came from the House of Representatives, and as it finally passed, substituted a general and universal ad valorem duty of fifty per cent. An effort was made in the Senate to resist this general ad valorem system, and to hold on to the specific duty. But it did not prevail. The Senate was nearly evenly divided. The casting or turning vote was held by a gentleman, a friend for whom I always entertain very high regard, a member from Maryland, and not now in the Senate. After the discussion, he admitted himself almost satisfied that the law, in this particular, ought not to be altered; but his impression against the minimum, nevertheless, finally prevailed, and he voted for the new mode--that is to say, the gen eral ad valorem mode of laying the duty; and, to render this effectual, he himself proposed to carry that duty as

The honorable member from South Carolina had referred to the tariff of 1828 as the cause of the swollen state of the Treasury. I agree that there were many things in the act of 1828 unnecessarily put there. But we know they were not put there by the friends of the act. That act is a remarkable instance, I hope never to be repeated, of unnatural, violent, angry legislation. Those who introduced it designed, originally, nothing more than to meet the new condition of things which had been brought about by the altered policy of Great Britain in relation to taxes on wool. A bill with the same end in view had passed the House of Representatives in 1827, but was lost in the Senate. The act of 1828, however objectionable though it certainly was in many respects, has not been, in my opinion, the chief cause of the over-product of the customs. I think the act of 1832, confirmed by the act of 1833, commonly called the compromise act, has had much more to do in producing that result. Up to the time of the passing of the act of 1832, the minimum principle had been preserved in laying duties on certain manufac-high as sixty per cent. The Senate fixed it, indeed, at tures, especially woollen cloths. This ill-understood and much-reviled principle appears to me, nevertheless, and always had appeared to me, to be a just, proper, effectual, and strictly philosophical mode of laying protecting duties. It is exactly conformable, as I think, with the soundest and most accurate principles of political economy. It is, in the most rigid sense, what all such enactments, so far as practicable, should be; that is to say, a mode of laying specific duty. It lays the impost exactly where it will do good, and leaves the rest free. It is an intelligent, discerning, and discriminating principle; not a blind, headlong, generalizing, uncalculating operation. Simplicity undoubtedly is a great beauty in acts of legislation, as well as in works of art; but in both it must be a simplicity the result of congruity of parts, and adaptation to the end designed; not a rude generalization, which either leaves the particular object unaccomplished, or, in accomplishing it, accomplishes a dozen others also, which were not desired. is a simplicity which is wrought out by knowledge and skill; not the rough product of an undistinguishing, sweeping, general principle.

It

Let us suppose that the gradations in woollen cloths be represented by a line. At one end of this line are those of the highest price, and let the scale descend to the other end, where, of course, will be those of the

fifty-seven per cent., but the House non-concurred, and the law finally passed, as all know, establishing an ad valorem duty of fifty per cent. on wollen cloths, &c.

Now, Mr. President, when we recollect that the duties on woollen fabrics, of all kinds, bring into the Treasury four, or five, or six millions a year, every man ac. quainted with our manufactures must see at once that a portion of this vast sum is perfectly useless as a protecting duty; because it is imposed on fabrics with which our own manufacturers maintain no competition, and in regard to which, therefore, they ask no protection. I have instituted sundry inquiries for the purpose of learning, and of showing, what is the amount of duties collected annually on wollens, which have no distinct bearing, as protecting duties, on any of the products of our manufacturers. At present I will only say, and will say that with great confidence, that, of the surplus money now in the Treasury, several millions are the proceeds of ad valorem duties, which have conferred no perceptible benefit whatever on our manufacturing establishments. It is, therefore, sir, that I regard the law of 1832, and not the law of 1828, as the great error in our legislation. This law of 1828 was confirmed by the act of 1833, and is, of course, in actual operation at the present moment, except so far as it has become affected by the gradual reduction provided for by the last mentioned act. I

SENATE.]

Public Deposites.

wish not to discuss the act of 1833. I do not propose, at present, to disturb its operation; but, having alluded to it, I take the occasion of saying that I have not the least idea that that act can remain as the settled system of this country. When the honorable member from Kentucky introduced it, he called it a measure of concil. iation, and expressed the hope that if the manufacturing interests should be found to suffer under it, it might be modified by general consent. Although never concur. ring in the act, I entertain the same hope. I pray most fervently that former strifes and controversies on the tariff question may never be revived; but, at the same time, it is my opinion that the principles established by the law of 1833 can never form the commercial system of this country.

But, Mr. President, the most striking increase in the public revenue is in that branch of it which is derived from the sales of the public lands. How happens it that the proceeds from this quarter have sprung up, thus suddenly, to such a height? The Secretary's estimate of the proceeds of the sales of the public lands for this year was only four millions. The actual sales are likely to be twenty. What has occasioned this great and unexpected augmentation?

Sir, we are to remember that the growth and prosperity of the country, generally, are remarkable, and that as these increase, the western tide, both of people and property, increases also. The reflow of this property is into the Treasury through the land offices.

[MAY 31, 1836.

portunity. Purchase, it is true, has gone ahead of emigration; but emigration follows it, in near pursuit, and spreads its thousands and its tens of thousands close on the heels of the surveyor and the land-hunter. When I traversed a part of the Western States, three years ago, I could not but ask myself, in the midst of the vast forests around me, Where are the people to come from who are to begin cultivation here, and to checker this wilderness with fields of wheat? But, when returning on the Cumberland road, or while passing along other great chan nels of communication, I encountered the masses of population moving westward, I was tempted to ask myself, on the other hand, a far different question, and that was, Where in the world will all these people find room to settle?

Nor are we to overlook, in this survey of the causes of the vast increase in the sale of lands, the effects, almost magical, of that great agent of beneficence, prosperity, wealth, and power-internal improvement. This has brought the West to the Atlantic, and carried the Atlantic to the West. Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin, are no longer places remote from us. Railroads and canals have brought the settlers of these regions so near to us that we almost see the smoke of their cabins and hear the strokes of their axes. Maine to the upper Mississippi is already a beaten track, with one's acquaintances every where along the road, and that road even not a long one, if we measure it by the time required to pass over it.

From

The well-sustained demand for cotton has, of course Mr. President, if I am asked how long these causes, or augmented the demand for cotton lands; and we all know any of them, will continue to act, with this effective that good lands, for the production of that crop, are energy, I readily answer that I cannot foresee. Nor can sought for with great eagerness. We are to include, I foresee other events, which may affect our revenue too, the great expansion of the paper circulation among in years to come. And it is for this reason precisely, the causes tending to produce heavy purchases; and the that what I propose is limited to a single year. All the amount of foreign capital that has found its way, through uncertainties and contingencies which naturally belong one channel or another, into the country, and is giving to human affairs, hang over us. I know not what exan additional stimulus, and additional facility to enter-penditures may be called for next year. I know not prises, both public and private. Many of the States what may be necessary to satisfy the all-absorbing capahave contracted large debts, for purposes of improve- city of Indian wars and Indian treaties. I know not ment, and these stocks have gone abroad. I suppose what events, at home or abroad, may shake our comthere may be fifty millions of State securities now owned mercial security. I know not what frosts and blights in Europe. Foreign capital, also, has been introduced, may do against the cotton crops. I know not what may to a great extent of late, as the basis of commercial happen to our currency. I cannot tell what demands enterprise; a thing ordinarily to be expected, when we for the use of capital in other objects may slacken the look to the low rates of interest abroad, and the great purchase of public lands; for I am persuaded that, heredemand for money at home. It would be hazardous to after, our income from that source is likely to be much estimate proportions and amounts, on such a subject; more fluctuating than heretofore, as depending less on but it is certain that a large amount of property now the actual amount of emigration, and more on the ocafloat, in ships and goods, owned by Americans, and casional plenty or scarcity of money. Emigration sailing and transported on American account, is put into must hereafter supply its wants, much more than forcommercial operation by means of foreign capital actual-merly, out of lands already separated from the public ly advanced, or acting through the agency of credit. domain. This introduction of foreign capital, in all the various forms, has doubtless had some effect in extending our paper circulation, and in raising prices; and certainly it has had a direct effect upon the ability of making investments in the public lands.

Under these circumstances, it appears to me to be prudent to limit the proposed division to a single operation. Let us lighten the Treasury for once; and then let us pause, and contemplate our condition. As to what may then be expedient, events will enlighten us. We shall be able to judge more wisely, by the result of our experiments, and the future will be more visible as it approaches nearer.

And, sir, closely connected with these causes, is another, which I should consider, after all, the main cause: that is, the low price of land, compared with other descriptions of property. In every thing else prices have It will be observed, sir, that I give full time to the run up; but here price is chained down by the statute. deposite banks to prepare themselves to pay over these Goods, products of all kinds, and indeed all other lands, funds. Time for this purpose is indispensable. We may rise, and many of them have risen, some twenty-might do rather harm than good, if we were to require five and some forty or fifty per cent.; but Government any sudden operation of that kind. Give the banks lands remain at a dollar and twenty-five cents an acre; time; let them know what they have to do; let the comand vast portions of this land are equal, in natural fer-munity see into what channels the surplus funds are to tility, to any part of the globe. There is nothing on flow, and when they are to begin to flow; and men of either continent to surpass their quality. The Government business will then be able to see what is before them. land, therefore, at the present prices, and at the present I have the fullest confidence that if we now adopt this moment, is the cheapest safe object of investment. The measure, it will immediately relieve the country. sagacity of capital has found this out, and it grasps the op- will remove that severe and almost unparalleled pressure

It

[blocks in formation]

for money which is now distressing and breaking down the industry, the enterprise, and even the courage, of the commercial community. I assure you, sir, this present pressure is not known, or felt, or believed here, in any thing like its true extent. If we give no relief, I know not what may happen, even in this day of high prosperity. I beseech those who have the power, not to let the opportunity pass, but to improve it, and thereby to revive the hopes and reassure the confidence of the country. Having expressed these sentiments, and brought forward this specific proposition for one division among the States of the surplus funds, I should now move to commit the whole subject, either to a select committee, or the Committee on Finance, were it not that, looking to the present composition of the Senate, I am not desirous of taking a lead in this measure. The responsibility naturally rests with those who have the power of majorities, and who may expect the concurrence of other branches. Meantime I cheerfully give myself to any labor which the occasion requires, and I express my own deep and earnest conviction of the propriety and expediency of the measures which I have endeavored to explain and to support.

Mr. W. then proposed the following as an amendment to the "bill to regulate the deposites of the public money," as an additional section:

SEC.. And be it further enacted, That the money which shall be in the Treasury of the United States on the first day of January, eighteen hundred and thirtyseven, reserving - millions, shall be divided among the several States, in proportion to their respective amounts of population, as ascertained by the last census, and according to the provision of the second section of the first article of the constitution; and the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay the same to such persons as the several States may authorize to receive it, in the following proportions, and at the following times, viz: one half on the first day of April, eighteen hundred and thirty-seven; one quarter part, on the first day of July, eighteen hundred and thirty-seven; and the remaining quarter on the first day of October, eighteen hundred and thirty-seven; and all States which shall receive their several proportions according to the provisions of this act, shall be taken and understood thereby to pledge the public faith of such States to repay the same, or any part thereof, to the United States, whenever Congress shall require the same to be repaid by any act or acts which shall require such payment ratably, and in equal proportion, from all the States which had received the

[blocks in formation]

[SENATE.

tion; which were ordered, and the question was decided in the affirmative by the following vote:

YEAS-Messrs. Benton, Black, Brown, Buchanan, Ewing of Illinois, King of Georgia, Leigh, Morris, Nicholas, Niles, Porter, Rives, Robinson, Ruggles, Shepley, Tallmadge, Walker, White, Wright-19.

NAYS--Messrs. Clay, Crittenden, Cuthbert, Dav is Ewing of Ohio, Goldsborough, Hendricks, Hubbard, King of Alabama, Naudain, Prentiss, Preston, Robbins, Southard, Tomlinson, Webster-16.

The bill to increase the military peace establishment of the United States was accordingly taken up, and after a brief explanation from Mr. BENTON, and at a late hour of the day, it was passed over, informally, and the Senate proceeded to the consideration of executive business; after which,

It adjourned.

[blocks in formation]

I transmit, herewith, to the Senate a communication which has been received from Mr. B. F. Curry, in answer to a call made upon him by the President, through charges which were preferred against him by one of the War Department, in consequence of the serious

the honorable members of the Senate. It seems to be due to justice that the Senate should be furnished, agreeably to the request of Mr. Curry, with the exPlanations contained in this communication, particularly as they are deemed so far satisfactory as would render his dismissal from the public service, or even his censure, undeserved and improper.

To the Senate:

ANDREW JACKSON. WASHINGTON, May 31, 1836.

I transmit, herewith, the response of Samuel Gwin, Esq. to the charges affecting his official conduct and character, which were set forth in the evidence taken under the authority of the Senate, by the Committee on Public Lands, and which was referred to the President by the resolution of the Senate bearing date the 3d of March, 1835. This resolution, and the evidence it refers to, were officially communicated to Mr. Gwin by the Secretary of the Treasury, and the response of Mr. Gwin has been received through the same official channel.

ANDREW JACKSON.

-

The messages having been read — Mr. BENTON observed, that with respect to the paper last referred to, the answer of Mr. Gwin to the charges made against him on that floor, he should, as an act of justice to that gentleman, move that it be printed. The Senate directed investigations to be made which involved his official character and conduct, and which he thought, from the nature of the instructions under which they were carried on, were entirely ex parte. The instructions to the commissioners who were to take the depositions, were partly to this effect:

[Here Mr. BENTON read from the document as follows:]

"It is not expected that you are to give notice to any one of the time and place of taking depositions; nor will any one be permitted, either as principal or counsel, to interfere with you in the performance of your

Mr. SOUTHARD expressed the hope that the pref-duty; but you may, at your option, furnish to any officer erence would be given to the bill to extend the charters of the banks of the District of Columbia.

Mr. BENTON called for the yeas and nays on his mo

who resides at a convenient distance, copies of any depositions in which he may be implicated. This, however, is left to your own discretion."

[blocks in formation]

The instructions went on to say that if the commissioner deemed it proper to have counsel, the fees paid for such purpose would be allowed him.

Mr. WALL inquired who these instructions were signed by?

Mr. BENTON answered that they were signed by George Poindexter, chairman of the Committee on Public Lands. He apprehended that these proceedings were a novelty in the history of this country, or in that of Great Britain, and he trusted that they never would occur again. Mr. Gwin, having become acquainted with the manner in which these investigations had been carried on-depositions to be taken in the dark without giving him an opportunity of being heard in his defence-counsel to be feed against him, &c., had collected a mass of testimony for the purpose of defending himself, and rebutting the charges made against him; and all that was now asked was, that this defence might be printed, and sent abroad in the same manner as the accusations against him had been.

Mr. WALL said he would be glad to know if these instructions were the act of a committee of the Senate, or of the man whose name was signed to them. They seemed to him to be at war with every thing like justice. Mr. BENTON, in answer, read the resolution of the Senate under which the Committee on Public Lands were directed to make examinations in relation to alleged frauds with respect to the public lands, and the resolution authorizing the chairman of the committee to continue the examinations in the recess of the Senate. It seemed, therefore, that the instructions emanated from the Land Committee, and were signed by their chairman, George Poindexter.

Mr. CALHOUN said that he knew nothing at all relative to the charges made against Mr. Gwin; but it appeared to him that the regular course would be to refer the whole subject to the Committee on Public Lands. If Mr. Gwin had satisfactorily refuted the charges made against him, or had not succeeded in doing so, the fact would appear by the report of the committee. The best way of doing justice to all parties would be to subject the whole matter to the investigation of a com

mittee.

Mr, EWING, of Ohio, hoped that the reference to the Committee on the Public Lands would not be made. The charges against Mr. Gwin had been made two years ago. He (Mr. E.) was not a member of the Committee on the Public Lands at that time, and there were very few of that committee who were now in the Senate. If the reference proposed were not perfectly idle, the effect would be to renew the investigation into the charges against Mr. Gwin, together with his defence.

[ocr errors]

[JUEE 1, 1836.

of the time and place of taking depositions against him, or to permit any person to interfere with the performance of his duty, though he might, at his option, give copies of such depositions to any officer implicated, who might reside within a convenient distance. Sir, (said Mr. B.,) the whole thing is wrong from beginning to end, and they had better have done with it at once. All that was asked by Mr. Gwin was, that as these charges against him had been printed, and made a part of the public documents, his answer should also be printed and put upon the record.

Mr. EWING, of Ohio, was not disposed to answer in behalf of the gentleman who was chairman of the Committee on Public Lands at the time these investigations were ordered. If that gentleman were here he could answer for himself. With respect to frauds on the public lands, it was right that each branch of Congress should enter into investigations to ascertain them, and apply the proper remedy; it was right that they should not be permitted to pass without investigation. He should not undertake to say whether these investigations were conducted properly or otherwise. The gentleman who conducted them was not here to explain that matter; but he thought the Senate ought not to exhibit any great anxiety to get out of this matter, because the investigation was a very proper one, and, under the circumstances then existing, the Senate could not have done otherwise than order it. It was not his purpose now to inquire whether those investigations were conducted properly or not; all he rose for was to ob ject to the reference to the committee of a matter long ago passed over. It could not now be referred for the correction of a present evil, but to pass judgment on what had heretofore been done.

Mr. KING, of Alabama, observed that the matter had now gone by, and he could not but express his regret that such unsuccessful efforts should have been made to resist a course of procedure calculated to do the greatest injustice to individuals who held office under this Government. He said then, what he thought now, that it was an act of great injustice and oppression, to give power to the committee to enter into investigations touching the moral and official conduct of an individual, that individual being absent, and unable to defend himself, without giving him an opportunity of knowing what was charged against him, and of refuting the testimony that might be offered. The Senate, however, passed the resolution giving this power to the committee, with power to send for persons and papers; and they went on with their examinations till towards the end of the session, when they represented that they were unable to bring matters to a close, and requested that the examinations might be continued by their chairman. The chairman himself laid a resolution to this purport on the table, and, to his astonishment, as well as of others, the

Mr. BENTON was also opposed to the reference. He did not want to see any committee of that body sit as inquisitors on a citizen of the United States. It seemed to be carrying the business of extra judicial impeach-resolution was sustained by the Senate. ments beyond any thing yet sanctioned by the people of this country, or warranted by the constitution. They had seen enough of these inquisitorial proceedings in that body. The whole thing was wrong from its inception; it began wrong, it went on wrong, and it ended wrong. The Snate had got itself into a false position, and could not get forwards or backwards without another false step. The most becoming thing they could now do, was to drop the whole affair, and print the paper, in order to allow the defence to take the same direction that had been given to tire accusation. It would sound strange to the ears of the people of the United States, that the Senate of eighteen hundred and thirty-four, which set itself up to rectify all the abuses in the country, should issue a commission to investigate the character and conduct of an individual, and expressly forbid the commissioner to give any information to the accused

[Mr. K. here read the resolution.]

The resolution was laid on the table and taken up for consideration on a subsequent day, when the Senator from New York [Mr. WRIGHT] proposed to amend it by doing that which ought always to be done, to guard the right of individuals, and enable them to come forward and defend themselves, when testimony was offered impeaching their characters as honest men and public officers.

[Mr. K. here read Mr. WRIGHT'S amendment.] This, as he said, was the amendment proposed to the resolution, giving unlimited power to the chairman of the committee to enter into examinations, without giving notice to the party whose conduct was to be inquired into, and whose morals were to be impeached; and, astonishing as it was, this amendment was negatived by a vote taken by yeas and nays.

JUNE 1, 1836.]

B. F. Curry and Samuel Gwin.

[SENATE.

[Mr. K. then quoted the yeas and nays from the jour-sitions that were to be taken. Mr. P. had no objection nal of the Senate.]

Thus then was this immense power given to a single individual, to go through the country to make any inquiries he thought necessary, and to incur any expense he might think proper, (and they had had evidence this session of the extent to which this expense had beed carried,) refusing any limitation or restriction whatever. This having been done, it was but an act of justice, on the part of the Senate, to give to the individual thus implicated, an opportunity of having his defence placed by the side of the accusation. Let the testimony in favor of Mr. Gwin circulate as widely as did that against him, and then only can any thing like justice be done him. As to any action by the committee, he agreed with the Senator from Ohio [Mr. EwING] that it was out of the question, and therefore a reference was not necessary.

Mr. PORTER was one of those who voted for these resolutions, and the responsibility that he took, on that occasion, he was perfectly willing to justify. He averred that the Senate formed no incorrect conclusions on that occasion, and that its conduct was not oppressive and unjust, as alleged. It could have taken no other course than the one it did, without defeating the object in view. Many believed that the greatest frauds were carried on in the sales of the public lands, and an inquiry was, therefore, absolutely necessary. But what was the nature of the inquiry? It was not into the conduct of any particular officer of the Government, but the inquiry was directed to be general as to all the land offices. If representations were made now that frauds were committed in any one branch of the Government, would the Senator from Alabama refuse to institute an inquiry because a particular officer of the Government might be implicated, and the Senate be called on to impeach him? Was it not common in the Governments of all other countries as well as this to institute inquiries into the conduct of their officers, to ascertain whether frauds had been committed; and was it ever heard of before that such investigations should not go on because frauds were alleged against individuals? It was said that the resolution was extraordinary, because no opportunity was allowed the individuals who might be implicated to defend themselves by a cross-examination of the witnesses. But was there a charge against any individual? The inquiry was to be a general one; and would it, therefore, be right to give notice to every individual, who might be supposed to be implicated, to come forward to disprove what might be alleged against him? It would be very extraordinary, indeed, if it should have been thought necessary to all who might by possibility be involved in the inquiry. Mr. P. here read the resolutions and instructions of the committee, commenting on them at some length, and justifying them as proper and necessary for the occasion. The motion of the Senator from New York to amend, that had been referred to by the Senator from Alabama, was resisted on the ground that the resolution was a mere matter of inquiry, no person believing that any judgment was to follow it; that it was purely intended as a foundation for legislative proceedings. It was to proceed like a grand jury; and he recollected that it was averred at the time that this investigation would tend to the injury of no person whatever, because no judicial proceedings would be gone into without giving time to any person implicated to offer evidence in his defence. If any person was to be tried, it was on all hands determined to give him an opportunity to come forward and exculpate himself before any further action would be had. Mr. P. thought, therefore, that there were no grounds for finding fault with the proceedings of the Senate. The investigation was a general one; and, while it was going on, it would have defeated its objects to give notice relative to the depo

to placing these papers on the files of the Senate. If the individual had any evidence, he had rather receive it than his allegations; but he thought the whole matter ought to be referred to the examination of the committee.

Mr. CALHOUN very much regretted that the chairman of the Committee on Public Lands should object to the reference of this paper. His object was that full justice should be done to Mr. Gwin, to Mr. Poindexter, and to the Senate. He would not agree that the Senate had not the right to inquire into the conduct of public officers when serious frauds had been charged against them, as he had heard alleged on that floor. Serious frauds had been alleged against Mr. Gwin, and among other charges was one that he had amassed a large fortune ina very short time. This, alone, was very suspicious, and an investigation was ordered. The session was a short one, and the committee reported that they could not get through with the examination before its close, the chairman proposing, by a resolution, that he should be authorized to go on with the examinations in the recess. This was agreed to. He did not now propose to inquire whether these examinations were conducted properly or not. One thing was now assumed here, and that was, the innocence of Mr. Gwin, and the guilt of Mr. Poindexter. Now, something was due to the absent; and an investigation by a committee was necessary before coming to the conclusion that Mr. Poindexter was culpable. Now, as these papers had taken an accusatory course against Mr. Poindexter, he would ask, was that gentleman called on for his evidence? Was he notified that he was to take Mr. Gwin's place, and that depositions were to be taken to implicate him? Was this an ex parte examination? If it was so improper on the part of the Senate to clothe Mr. Poindexter with these extraor dinary powers, he would ask were they prepared to sanction the same thing done by the Executive, who had given to Mr. Gwin, or somebody else, the power to examine into the conduct of Mr. Poindexter?

Now they were called on to vote in the dark for the printing of these papers, of which they knew nothing, for the purpose of implicating Mr. Poindexter and the Senate itself. He took it for granted that the inquiry into alleged frauds, relative to the public lands, was a proper one; and if Mr. Poindexter abused the power with which he was intrusted, it was not the fault of the Senate; and the fact whether this was so or not, could be best ascertained by the examination of a committee. They had been told that there was nothing for the ac tion of a committee. Now he thought otherwise. The character of an officer of the Government had been implicated; he had been charged with an abuse of office, and his defence was before them. Now, if Mr. Gwin was innocent, he ought to be called so. When he voted for the inquiry, his object was to do justice to Mr. Gwin and to the public; and in voting now for the ref erence, he had the same object in view. Justice, both towards Mr. Gwin, and one who had formerly been a member of that body, required the reference. If they condemned Mr. Poindex er, it ought to be with their eyes open. They all knew what an arduous task a Senator in high party times had to perform, and how liable the strict execution of his duty was to subject him to censure. No member of that body would be willing that his conduct should be censured after he left here without an examination; and he called upon gentlemen by what was due to themselves, as well as to justice, to vote for the reference.

Mr. SHEPLEY said, if the Senator from Louisiana [Mr. PORTER] understands that the investigations of the Committee upon the Public Lands were extended only to inquiries of a general character into alleged frauds in

« AnteriorContinuar »