Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of the State of Indiana, Volume 157
Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Michael Crawford Kerr, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Francis Marion Dice, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy
Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1902
"With tables of the cases and principal matters" (varies).
Opinião das pessoas - Escrever uma crítica
Não foram encontradas quaisquer críticas nos locais habituais.
Outras edições - Ver tudo
action affidavit affirmed alleged allowed amount answer appellant appellant's appellee apply appointment assessment assigned authority averments bank bill Bridges cause charge Circuit Court Citizens claim commissioners committed common complaint Constitution construction contract corporation council damages defendant demurrer directors duty effect election engine error evidence ex rel exceptions execution facts failed failure filed follows further give given granted ground held Horner Indiana injury instructions issue Judge judgment jury license matter motion natural necessary negligence notice objection offense operation overruled paragraph party person plaintiff presented president proceedings proper prosecuting prove question railroad reason receiver record recover refused relator respect result rule secure statute street sufficient sustained taken term thereof tion track train trial verdict Western Union witness
Página 473 - Any person may be made a defendant who has or claims an interest in the controversy adverse to the plaintiff, or who is a necessary party to a complete determination or settlement of the question involved therein.
Página 604 - And the repeal of any statute shall not have the effect to release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture, or liability...
Página 126 - ... on real estate, or of judgments or decrees in its favor ; all deposits of money, bullion, or other valuable thing...
Página 604 - The repeal of any statute shall not have the effect to release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred under such statute, unless the repealing Act shall so expressly provide, and such statute shall be treated as still remaining in force for the purpose of sustaining any proper action or prosecution for the enforcement of such penalty, forfeiture, or liability.
Página 312 - The carrier and his customers do not stand on a footing of equality. The latter Is only one Individual of a million. He cannot afford to higgle or stand out and seek redress In the courts. His business will not admit such a course. He prefers rather to accept any bill of ladIng, or sign any paper the carrier presents — often, Indeed, without knowing what the one or the other contains. In most cases he has no alternative but to do this or abandon his business...
Página 456 - After a statute has been settled by judicial construction, the construction becomes, so far as contract rights acquired under it are concerned, as much a part of the statute as the text itself, and a change of decision is to all intents and purposes the same in its effect on contracts as an amendment of the law by means of a legislative enactment.
Página 278 - ... 1. When the debtor has been guilty of no fraud or bad faith, he is liable only for such damages as were contemplated, or may reasonably be supposed to have entered into the contemplation of the parties at the time of the contract.
Página 207 - The writ of mandamus may be denominated the writ of mandate.— 1873-345. 1085. It may be issued by any court, except a justice's or police court, to any inferior tribunal, corporation, board, or person, to compel the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins, as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station...
Página 40 - The Governor shall have the power to grant reprieves, commutations and pardons after conviction, for all offenses except treason and cases of impeachment, upon such conditions and with such restrictions and limitations as he may think proper, subject to such regulations as may be provided by law relative to the manner of applying for pardons.