« AnteriorContinuar »
For on the rope that hangs my dear, * Depends poor Polly's life.'
Quin himself had so bad au opinion of it, that he refused the part of Captain Macheath, and gave it to Walker, who acquired great celebrity by his grave yet animated performance of it.
We talked of a young gentleman's marriage with an eminent singer, and his determination that she should no longer sing in public, though his father was very earnest she should, because her talents would be liberally rewarded, so as to make her a good fortune. It was questioned whether the young gentleman, who had not a shilling in the world, but was blest with very uncommon talents, was not foolishly delicate, or foolishly proud, and his father truly rational withoạt being mean. Johnson, with all the high spirit of a Roman senator, exclainied, Here. solved wisely and nobly to be sure. He is a brave man. Would not a gentleman be disgraced by having his wife singing publicly for hire ? No, Sir, there can be no doubt here, I know not if I should not prepare myself for a public singer, as readily as let my wife be one.
Johnson arraigced the modern politics of this country, as entirely devoid of all principle of whatever kind. Politics (said he) are nothing more than the means of rising in the world. With this sole view do men engage in politics, and their whole conduct proceeds upon it. How different in that respect is the state of the nation now from what it was in the time of Charles the First, during the Usurpation, and after the Restoration, in the time of Charles the 'Second. Hudibras affords a strong proof how much hold political principles had then upon the minds of men. There is in Hudibras a great deal of bullion which will always last. But to be sure, the brightest strokes of his wit owed their force to the impression of the characters, which was upon ineu's minds at the time: to their knowing them, at table and in the street ; in short, being familiar with them; and above all, to his satire being directed against those whom a little while before they had hated and feared. The nation in general has ever been loyal, has been at all times attached to the monarch, though a few daring rebels have been wonderfully powerful for a time. The murder of Charles the First was undoubtedly not committed with the approbation or consent of the people. Had that been the case, parliament would not have ventured to consign the regicides to their deserved punishment. And we know what exuberance of joy there was when Charles the Second was restored. If Charles the Second had bent all his mind to it, had made it his sole object, he might have been as absolute as Louis the Fourteenth. A gentleman observed he would have done no harm if he bad. Jobpson. Why, Sir, absolute princes seldoin do any harm. But they who are governed by them are governed by chance. There is no security for good governmeot. Cama brige. There have been many sad victims to absolute goverument,
Johnson. So, Sir, have there been to popular factions. Boswell. The question is, which is worst, one wild beast or many ?
Johnson praised The SPECTATOR,' particularly the character of Sir Roger de Coverly. He said, Sir Roger did not die a violent death, as has been generally fancied. He was no: killed; he died only because others were to die, and because his death afforded an opportunity to Addison for some very fine writing. We have the example of Cervantes making Don Quixote die.--I never could see why Sir Roger is repregented as a little cracked. It appears to ine that the story of the widow was intended to have something superinduced upon it; but the superstructure did not come,
Somebody found fault with writing verses in a dead language, maintaining that they were merely arrangements of so many words, und laughed at the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, for sending forth collections of them not only in Greek and Latio, but even in Syriac, Arabic, and other more unknown tongues. Johnson. I would have as many of these as possible; I would have verses in every language that there are the means of acquiring. Nobody imagines that an University is to have at voce two hundred poets; but it should be able to shew two hundred scholars, Pierce's death was lamented, I think, in forty languages. And I would have had at every coronation, and every death of a king, every Gaudium, and every Luctus, University-verses, in as many languages as can be acquired. I would have the world to be thus told, Here is a school where every thing may be learnt,'
Having set out next day on a visit to the Earl of Pembroke, at Wilton, and to my friend, Mr. Temple, at Mamhead, in Devonshire, and not having returned to town till the second of May, I did not see Dr. Johoson for a considerable time, and during the remaining part of my stay in London, kept very imperfect notes of his conversation, which had I according to my usual custom written out at large soon after the time, much might have been preserved, which is now irretrievably lost. I can now ooly record some particular scenes, and a few fragments of his memorabilia. But to make some amends for my relaxation of diligence in one respect, I have to present my readers with arguments upon two law Cuses, with which he favoured me.
On Saturday, the 6th of May, we dined by ourselves at the Mitre, and he dictated to me what follows, to obviate the complaint already mentioned, which had been made in the form of an action in the Court of Session, hy Dr. Mernis, of Aberdeen, that in the same translation of a character in which physicians were mentioned, he was called Doctor of Medicine. • There are but two reasons for which a physician can decline the title of Doctor of Medicine, because he supposes himself disgraced by the doc. torship, or supposes the doctorship disgraced by himself. To be disgraced by a title which he shares in common with every illustrious name of his profession, with Boerhaave, with Arbuthnot, and with Cullen, can surely diminish no man's reputation. It is, I suppose, to the doctorate, from which he shrinks, that he owes his right of practising physic. A Doctor of Medicine is a physician under the protection of the laws, and by the stamp of authority. The physician who is not a Doctor, usorps a profession, and is authorized only by himself to decide upon health and sickness, and life and death. That this gentleman is a Doctor, bis diploma makes evident; a diploma not obtruded upon him, but obtained by solicitation, and for wbich fees were paid. With what countenance any'man can refuse the title which he has either begged or bought, is not easily discovered.
All verbal injury must comprise in it either some false position, or some unnecessary declaration of defamatory truth. That in calling him Doctor, a false appellation was given bim, he himself will not pretend, who, at the same time that he complains of the title, would be offended if we supposed him to be not a Doctor. If the title of Doctor be a defamatory truth, it is time to dissolve our colleges : for why should the public give salaries to men whose approbation is reproach? It may likewise deserve the notice of the public to consider what help can be given to the professors of physic, who all share with this unbappy gentleman the ignominious appellation, and of whom the very boys in the street are not afraid to say, There goes the Doctor.
What is implied by the term Doctor is well known. It distinguishes him to whom it is granted, as a man who has attained such knowledge of his profession as qualifies him to instruct others. A doctor of Laws is a man who can form lawyers by his precepts. A doctor of Medicine is a man who can teach the art of curing diseases. This is au old axiom, which no man has yet thought fit to deny, Nil dat quod non habet. Upon this principle to be Doctor implies skill, for nemo docet quod non didicit. In England, whoever practises physic, not being a Doctor, must practice by a licence: but the doctorate conveys a licence in itself.
By what accident it happened that he and the other physicians were mentioned in different terms, where the terms themselves were equivalent, or where in effect that which was applied to him was the most honourable, perhaps they who wrote the paper cannot now remember. Had they expected a lawsuit to have been the consequence of such petty variation, I hope they would have avoided it. But, probably, as they meant no ill, they suspected po danger, and therefore consulted only what appeared to them propriety or convenience.
A few days afterwards, I consulted him upon a cause, Paterson and others against Alerander and others, which had been decided by a casting vote in the Court of Session, determining that the Corporation of Stirling was corrupt, and setting aside the election of some of their officers, bea cause it was proved that three of the leading men who influenced the majority, bad entered into an unjustifiable compact, of which, however, the majority were ignoraut. He dictated to me, after a little consideration, the following sentences upon the subject :
" There is a difference between majority and superiority; majority is applied to pumber, and superiority to power: and power, like many other things, is to be estimated non numero sed pondere. Now though the greater number is not corrupt, the greater weight is corrupt, so that corruption predomiuates in the borough, taken collectively, though, perhaps, taken numerically, the greater part may be uncorrupt. That borongh, which is so constituted as to act corruptly, is in the eye of reason corrupt, whether it be by the uncontrolable power of a few, or by an accidental pravity of the multitude. The objection, in which is urged the injustice of making the innocent suffer with the guilty, is an objection not only against society, but against the possibility of society. All societies, great and small, subsist upon this condition ; that as the individuals derive advantages from union, they may likewise suffer inconveniences; that as those who do nothing, and sometimes those who do ill, will have the honours and emoluments of general virtue and general prosperity, so those likewise who do nothing, or perhaps do well, must be involved in the consequences of predominant corruption.”
This in my opinion was a very nice case; but the decision was affirmed in the House of Lords.
On Monday, May 8, we went together and visited the mansions of Bedlam. I had been informed that he had once been there before with Mr. Wedderburne, (now Lord Loughborough,) Mr. Murphy, and Mr. Foote; and I had heard Foote give a very entertaining account of Johuson's happening to have his attention arrested by a man who was very furious, and who, while beating his straw, supposed it was William, Duke of Cumberland, whom he was punishing for his cruelties in Scotland, in 1746. There was nothing peculiarly remarkable this day; but the geueral contemplation of insanity was very affecting. I accompanied him home, and dined and drank tea with him.
Talking of an acquaintance of ours, distinguished for knowing an uncommon variety of miscellaneous articles both in antiquities and polite literature, be observed, You know, Sir, he runs about with little weight upon his miod. And talking of another very ingenious gentleman, who from the warmth of his temper was at variance with many of his acquaintance, and wished to avoid them, he said, “Sir, he leads the life of an outlaw.
On Friday, May 12, as he had been so good as to assign me a room in Isis house, where I night sleep occasionally, when I happened to sit with bim to a late hour, I took possession of it this night, found every thing in excellent order, and was attended by honest Francis with a most civil assiduity. I asked Johnson whether I might go to a coosultation with another lawyer upon Sunday, as that appeared to me to be doing work as much in my way, as if an artizan should work on the day appropriated for religious rest. Johnson. Why, Sir, when you are of consequence enough to oppose the practice of consulting upon Sunday, you should do it: but you may go now. It is not criminal, though it is not what one should do, who is anxious for the preservation and increase of piety, to which a peculiar observance of Sunday is a great help. The distinction is clear between what is of moral and what is of ritual obligation.
On Saturday, May 13, I break fasted with him by invitation, accompanied by Mr. Andrew Crosbie, a Scotch Advocate, whom he had seeu at Edinburgh, and the Hon. Colouel (now General) Edward Stopford, brother to Lord Courtown, who was desirous of being introduced to him. His tea, and rolls and butter, and whole breakfast apparatus, were allia such decorum, and his behaviour was so courteous, that Colonel Stopford was quite surprized, and wondered at his having heard so much said of Johnson's sloveoliness and roughness. I have preserved nothing of what passed, except that Crosbie pleased him much by talking learnedly of alchymy, as to which Johnson was not a positive unbeliever, but rather delighted in considering what progress had actually been made in the transmutation of metals, what near approaches there had been to the making of gold; and told us that it was affirmed, that a person in the Russian dominions had discovered the secret, but died without revealing it, as imagining it would be prejudicial to society. He added, that is was not impossible but it might in time be generally known.
It being asked, whether it was reasonable for a man to be angry at another whom a woman had preferred to him ? -Johnson. I do not see, Sir, that it is reasonable for a man to be angry at another, whom a woman bas preferred to him: but angry he is, no doubt; and he is loath to be angry at himself.
Before setting out for Scotland on the 23d, I was frequently in his come pany at different places, but during this period have recorded only two remarks: one concerning Garrick: He bas 1,0t Latin enough. He finds out the Latin by the meaniug rather than the meaning by the Latin. And another concerning writers of travels, who, he observed, were more defective than any other writers.
I passed many hours with him ou the 17th, of which I find all my memorial is 'much laughing.' It should seem he had that day been in a humour for jocularity and merriment, and upon such occasions I never knew a man laugh more heartily. We may suppose, that the high relish of a state so different from his habitual gloom, produced more than ordinary exertions of that distinguishing faculty of man, which has puzzled philosophers so much to explain. Johoson's laugh was as reiparkable as any circumstance in his manner. It was a kind of good hu. moured growl. Tom Davies described it drolly enough, He laughs like a rhinoceros.'