Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

ring the present session of Congress, to make great and important changes, affecting all branches of the revenue, and all the sources from which money comes into the public Treasury, calculations, estimates, conjectures, might be made as to the revenues of the present year; but all such calculations, even in that case, would be most vague and uncertain at best. The experience of the last two years has demonstrated the impossibility, with all the information which can be reached by those officers of the Government whose sole business and duty it is to manage our fiscal affairs, of so perfecting estimates upon this point that they may not disappoint us many millions. Distinguished and experienced legislators, too, have frequently attempted estimates with no better success, and no member of the Committee on Finance can pretend to information, or judgment, superior to those who have thus erred in their conjectures as to the receipts into our public Treasury for a given future period.

Add, then, the consideration that both branches of Congress are, at this moment, considering bills designed to diminish, for the future, the receipts into the Treas. ury from the sales of public lands, the impossibility that the committee should know whether any bill upon that subject will finally pass, and become a law; what may be the provisions of the bill which shall pase, in case any bill do pass; and what may be the effect, in practice, upon the receipts of money for land sales, of any given provisions which may be incorporated in any bill, and Mr. W. said he could not suppose it would be expected by the Senate that the Committee on Finance would have attempted any estimate of the amount to be reduced from the revenue from customs, in order to reduce the whole receipts into the Treasury to the standard of the economical wants of the Government. Against a body of contingencies and uncertainties of the magnitude and character specified, added to those which must always attend estimates of future revenue from uncertain sources, estimates in name would be more loose than ordinary conjectures; and so loose as to be of no other value than the mere conjectures of so many members of the body to which their report would be submitted. So much for the reasons which have led the committee to come to the conclusion not to attempt estimates, or calculations, or conjectures, as to the amount of money to come into the national Treasury during the present or any future year. They have satisfied themselves that the reductions from the revenue from customs proposed by the bill they recommend can be spared by the national Treasury, and leave it able to meet the necessary calls upon it. They do not pretend to say that further reductions will not be required to bring the revenue to the point so much desired, that of the economical wants of the Government. The receipts into the public Treasury are now greatly above that point. The committee have already said their examinations have convinced them that the great measures of reduction must be directed to that branch of the receipts arising from the sales of lands. They feel strongly the soundness of the principle, that reduction should be proceeded in cautiously and carefully; and, so far as that can be done, with a certainty that, while we are remedying one evil, we do not fall into another; that while we omit nothing which can be properly done to reduce the revenue to the wants of the Governmen', we do nothing calculated to carry us so far below that point as immediately to produce the necessity of again raising revenue by an increased rate of duties upon imports. These constant fluctuations, sudden and excessive changes in our revenue laws, and consequent agitations of the public mind, and uncertainties in the operations of mercantile and commercial men, Mr. W. said, he thought it most important, in any legislation, to avoid. Hence, he, as a member of the committee, had determined to pur

[SENATE.

sue what he considered a safe course, neither endangering nor disturbing any important protected interest of the country, or the public Treasury in meeting the necessary calls upon it. He had not attempted to determine that the bill would do all that a full remedy for the existing evil demanded, but merely that, in the present state of uncertainty as to the other important branch of the public receipts, and the influences upon it of the instant legislation of Congress, it was all the committee had concluded, at present, to recommend, and that so much might be done safely.

Mr. W. said there was no less difficulty in making calculations and estimates upon the other side of this great account, the public expenditures. The ordinary expenditures of the Government, that portion of the expenses required to keep all the departments of the Government in organization and operation, were laid before us by the proper fiscal officer of the Government, and appropriations to that extent might be very safely calculated upon. All the information within the power of the committee upon this class of appropriations had been equally fully in the hands of every member of Congress, from the commencement of the session. No benefit here, then, could be derived from any report the committee could have made. All beyond this was within the pleasure of the two Houses of Congress and the President. What extraordinary appropriations they might see fit to make for fortifications, for the navy, for public defence generally, or for any other of the great objects calling for expenditures of money, it was not only out of the power of the committee to say, but would be in vain for them to attempt to conjecture. They could not, therefore, with any certainty, estimate the expenses of the year. Mr. W. said he felt conscious that the appropriations of Congress would, as he thought those appropriations should, be graduated by a due regard to the ability of the Treasury to pay, and the public and national wants to be supplied; but he also further believed that a redundant Treasury always promoted, not large merely, but extravagant appropriations; and one of his greatest anxieties to reduce the national revenues to the national wants arose from the conviction that in that way only can we preserve a system of economical expenditures. He would add no more upon this branch of the subject, hoping the Senate would find in these suggestions sufficient apology for the action of the committee in submitting the bill without any attempt at a report upon these vague uncertainties.

He

A single other remark, (said Mr. W.,) and he would relieve the Senate from listening to him further. had not forgotten that another bill had been introduced elsewhere upon this same subject, and proposing to accomplish the same great purpose. He hoped he should not be considered as infringing, unpardonably, upon the rules of order, in making this reference to that measure. It might be supposed by some member of this body, it might be supposed by some member of the other House of Congress, or it might be supposed by some portion of our common constituents, that this bill, coming from the Committee on Finance, was designed to conflict with the measure referred to. For himself, (said Mr. W.,) he could say, with perfect truth, that no such motive or feeling had entered into his action. He was sure he could say the same for his colleagues upon the committee. They had considered the reference of the Senate, in the special manner in which it had been made, positive and mandatory upon them. A report of some sort was their duty, and the report which they believed most conformable to their duty, under the reference, was the bill he was about to present. The time for making their report was not a matter of their pleasure. If made in the shape of a bill, they were bound to make it in time to permit the possibility of action upon it; and they had

[blocks in formation]

not been unfrequently reminded of the impatience of some members of the body for the conclusions to which they should come. Their delay had been unintentional and compulsory, and the advancement of the session had urgently admonished them that further delay would be equal to a failure to discharge the important and delicate duty intrusted to them. He (Mr. W.) thought that an examination of the two bills would satisfy every one that they could, in no sense, be antagonist to each other. The one proposes to add largely to the list of free articles, and to make material reductions upon two classes of articles not considered as belonging to the protected products or manufactures of the country. The other proposes to hasten, with very great rapidity, the reductions proposed to be made by the compromise act. It cannot, then, escape attention that there is no contradiction, in principle or action, between the two measures. Both may make too large or too rapid a reduction; but should the bill now presented fall short of its object, a sufficient reduction of the revenue from custons, it was his duty to say that no other mode of further material reductions had suggested itself to his mind, in the course of his examinations and reflections upon the subject, than to adopt the principle of that bill, moderated as to time so as to suit the exigency. He would further say, that he wished those most interested in the great and important provisions of the compromise act could see, as he thought he could see, that it was their peculiar interest to consent to a modification of that act, which should make its reductions of the revenue gradual and uniform from the present period to the year 1842; a little more rapid from this time to 1841, and much less precipitous and shocking to those interests from 1841 to 1842. As, however, the committee had no evidence before them of the feeling of the citizens most deeply interested in this policy, and as they had determined, if possible, to digest a bill which would meet with favor, and be passed into a law, they refrained from affixing any such condition to the bill they now report.

As to the instant effect of the two measures, (said Mr. W.,) he believed there would be little difference. The bill he held in his hand proposed to reduce a fraction over $2,400,000, from and after the 30th June next. The other measure to which he had referred, as he understood it, proposed to reduce about $7,000,000 at three periods stated; the first of which was the 30th of September next, and the only one of the three periods falling within the present year. That measure, however, was prospective, and this was not; but Congress would be again in session before that bill would have effected but one reduction, and the accounts of the Treasury for another year would have been laid before us, as our guide to future and further action. He would detain the Senate no longer.

Mr. WRIGHT having concluded his introductory remarks explanatory of the objects of the bill,

Mr. CLAY said that he wanted, at this early stage of the bill, to say only a word or two. I will begin, said he, with expressing the regret I feel that no written report accompanies this bill, and that the substitute with which we have been presented, in the verbal remarks of the Senator from New York, is not as satisfactory as I think it might have been. In considering the amount of revenue which the wants of any Government may require, two questions should be taken into view. First, the probable amount of the revenue to be received from the taxes; and, in the second place, the probable amount of the public expenditure. If Congress have no knowledge of these, how can they know what revenue is to be raised, or what reduction may be provided for? In both of these points, the Senator from New York has utterly failed to furnish the Senate with any information.

[JAN. 27, 1837.

By way of getting rid of presenting to us the proba ble amount of revenue, the Senator states that the Fi nance Committee are not able to offer any thing but un. certain conjectures. But every man who has hitherto been charged with the finances of the country, whether a Secretary of the Treasury or the chairman of a Finance Committee, has supposed it important to go into conjec. tures or estimates on these subjects, and to approximate as far as possible to the truth, that the Government may be enabled to form some practical estimate of the amount to which they may with propriety tax the people. But if the Senator thinks he can justify himself for this omission, how will he justify it to the country, and to those great interests which are assailed by this bill, that we have been furnished with no information touching the amount of public expenditure; and without informa tion on either point, how has he come to the conclusion that there can exist a redundant revenue, and that it is an evil so great as to call for the legislation of Congress? But I have not risen simply to express my regret at the want of information under which we are invited to act. I have risen, at once, promptly to declare that I shall oppose, so far as my voice and my vote can go, this disturbance of the compromise arrangement made in March, 1833, under which the country has flourished in an unparalleled degree, and on which all parties have reposed as being durable and permanent.

In regard to the articles of salt and spirituous liquors, both of which, but salt especially, are articles which cannot be touched without a violation of that compromise, the former is one in which my State has little interest, as connected with a tax for protection. It is the great States of New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Ohio, which are principally concerned in this question. In my own State, some of the article is manufactured, but we are so situated that the manufacture, as existing among us, derives no advantage from any protective duty. So far, therefore, as my constituents are concerned, I care not a particle if the duty shall be repealed in folo. But I oppose the measure because I view it as what has often and expressively been denominated an entering wedge; and because it is well known that all encroachments on the system may be expected to commence under plausi ble pretexts. The article of coal is an instance of this. In the depth of winter, when, during a season of intense cold, all are shivering for the want of a more abundant supply of fuel, the cry is raised to repeal the duty on foreign coal. So salt is known by every body to be an essential article of human subsistence, and it is seized upon as furnishing a plausible article on which the duty may be reduced, or dispensed with altogether.

But if these are all articles covered by the compromise, what security, what guarantee, can the country possess that the work of reduction is to stop at that point? Will not the process, ere long, reach to cotton and to wool lens? Nay, are we not already notified, while, as I admit, the Senator has brought us a bill less exceptionable than a corresponding one which has been introduced elsewhere, that is not "antagonistical" (I believe the term is) to that measure; that there is no hostility be tween the two; and, if the purpose shall not be effected by this bill, for reducing the revenue to a sum not speci fied, that bill itself, or some kindred measure, must be resorted to? I want the country to know what is its actual condition. I want it to know whether that odious, that shocking list of articles, which has just been read by the Secretary, is to be brought up, session after session, for discussion and gradual action, till the whole pro. tective system is destroyed. The country has a right to know whether the peace effected by the compromise of 1833 is to be respected; or whether it is to be assa led, first, in respect to articles calculated to excite public sympathy in their favor, and then those more important

[blocks in formation]

ones are at length to be reached which are essential to the prosperity of the national industry.

I have now discharged what I believed to be a duty. You have the power, both in this House and the other; you can do in this matter as you think proper. Go on, then. Disturb, distract the country; reagitate the community; reopen its wounds, just closed; do this, if it seems to you good; take upon yourselves the awful responsibility; but you shall never do it with my consent, nor without my solemn protest.

Mr. WRIGHT, in reply, observed that he should not argue the bill at this time. He had at present but one duty to perform, which was to report the bill. lle would say again that the Finance Committee considered the amount both of revenue and expenditure for the coming year so entirely dependent on the action of Congress, that, beyond the documents already on the tables of members, the committee could state no valuable fact for their consideration. He would move that the bill be made the special order of the day for Thursday next, and that, in the mean time, the statement which had been presented in company with the bill might be printed.

The printing having been ordered,

Mr. DAVIS observed that this measure was one of great importance, and worthy of great consideration. He considered it desirable to keep the country out of agitation; its prosperity depended more on that than this body seemed to be fully aware of; prosperity was impossible, under any policy, unless the nation had the assu rance of something steady in that policy. The nation wanted rest; the people need repose, that they may know what to do. He had almost said that even a bad policy, if steady, was better than a comparatively good one, if unsteady and perpetually fluctuating. This was pecu. liarly true in relation to the manufactures of the country, because those who conducted these establishments, if they were able to look a few years ahead, could shape their mode of conducting business so as to meet the policy of the Governmennt. The bill proposed seriously to affect, among other articles, that of salt, in which Mr. D's State was largely interested, inasmuch as very large capitals were vested in establishments for its manufacture upon the seashore. Inasmuch, therefore, that the country might understand what was doing here, and what was sought to be accomplished by this bill, he would ask that one thousand extra copies of the statement which bad accompanied the bill be printed. This was agreed to.

[SENATE.

on account of the public dues; and from and after the thirtieth day of December, eighteen hundred and thirtynine, the notes of no bank which shall issue or circulate bills or notes of a less denomination than ten dollars shall be so receivable; and from and after the thirtieth day of December, one thousand eight hundred and forty-one, the like prohibition shall be extended to the notes of all banks issuing bills or notes of a less denomination than twenty dollars.

Sac. 2. And be it further enacted, That no notes shall be received by the collectors or receivers of the public money which the banks in which they are to be deposited shall not, under the supervision and control of the Secretary of the Treasury, agree to pass to the credit of the United States as cash: Provided, That if any depos ite bank shall refuse to receive and pass to the credit of the United States, as cash, any notes receivable under the provisions of this act, which said bank, in the ordinary course of business, receives on general deposite, the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby authorized to withdraw the public deposites from said bank.

The question being on the passage of the bill,

Mr. BENTON rose and commenced his speech against its passage with stating the reason why he had not spoken the evening before, when the question was on the engrossment of the bill. He said that he could not have foreseen that the subject depending before the Senate, the bill for limiting the sales of the public lands to actual settlers, would be laid down for the purpose of taking up this subject out of its order; and, therefore, had not brought with him some memorandums which he intended to use when this subject came up. He did not choose to ask for delay, because his habit was to speak to subjects when they were called; and in this particular cause he did not think it material when he spoke; for he was very well aware that his speaking would not affect the fate of the bill. It would pass; and that was known to all in the chamber. It was known to the Senator from Ohio [Mr. EwING] who indulged himself in saying he thought otherwise a few days ago; but that was only a good-natured way of stimulating his friends, and bringing them up to the scratch. The bill would pass, and that by a good vote, for it would have the vote of the opposition, and a division of the administration vote. Why, then, did he speak? Because it was due to his position, and the part he had acted on the currency questions, to express his sentiments more fully on this bill, so vital to the general currency, than could be done by a mere negative vote. He should, therefore, speak

The bill was then read a second time, and made the against it, and should direct his attention to the bill reorder of the day for Thursday next.

TREASURY CIRCULAR.

The following bill, which was yesterday ordered to be engrossed for a third reading, was accordingly read a third time:

A bill designating and limiting the funds receivable for the revenues of the United States.

ported by the Public Land Committee, which had so totally changed the character of the proceeding on this subject. The recision of the Treasury order was intro

duced a resolution-it went out a resolution-but it came back a bill, and a bill to regulate, not the land of fice receipts only, but all the receipts of the Federal Government; and in this new form is to become statute law, and a law to operate on all the revenues, and to reBe it enacted, &c., That the Secretary of the Treasu- peal all other laws upon the subject to which it related. ry be, and hereby is, required to adopt such measures In this new form it assumes an importance, and acquires as he may deem necessary to effect a collection of the an effect, infinitely beyond a resolution, and becomes, Mr. public revenue of the United States, whether arising in fact as well as in name, a totally new measure. from duties, taxes, debts, or sales of lands, in the manB. reminded the Senate that he had, in his first speech ner and on the principles herein provided: that is, that no on this subject, given it as his opinion, that two main obsuch duties, taxes, debts, or sums of money payable for jects were proposed to be accomplished by the rescindlands, shall be collected or received otherwise than in ing resolution: first, the implied condemnation of Presithe legal currency of the United States, or in notes of dent Jackson for violating the laws and constitution, and banks which are payable and paid on demand in the said destroying the prosperity of the country; and, secondlegal currency of the United States, under the followingly, the imposition of the paper currency of the States restrictions and conditions in regard to such notes, to upon the Federal Government. With respect to the wit: from and after the passage of this act, the notes of first of these objects, he presumed it was fully proved no bank which shall issue or circulate bills or notes of by the speeches of all the opposition Senators who had a less denomination than five dollars shall be received spoken on this subject; and, with respect to the second,

VOL. XIII.-37

[blocks in formation]

he believed it would find its proof in the change which the original resolution had undergone, and the form it was now assuming of statute law, and especially with the proviso which was added at the end of the second section.

Mr. B. then took up the bill reported by the committee, and remarked, first, upon its phraseology, not in the spirit of verbal criticism, but in the spirit of candid objection and fair argument. There were cases in which words were things, and this was one of those cases. Money was a thing, and the only words in the constitution for that thing were, "gold and silver coin." The bill of the committee was systematically exclusive of the words which meant this thing, and used words which included things which were not money. These words were, then, a fair subject of objection and argument, because they went to set aside the money of the constitution, and to admit the public revenues to be paid in something which was not money.

The title of the bill uses the word "funds." It professes to designate the funds receivable for the revenues of the United States. Upon this word Mr. B. had remarked before, as being one of the most indefinite in the English language; and, so far from signifying money only, even paper money only, that it comprehended every variety of paper security, public or private, individual or corporate, out of which money could be raised. The retention of this word by the committee, after the objections made to it, were indicative of their intentions to lay open the federal Treasury to the reception of something which was not constitutional money; and this intention, thus disclosed in the title to the bill, was fully carried out in its enactments. The words "legal cur rency of the United States" are twice used in the first section, when the words "gold and silver" would have been more appropriate and more definite, if hard money was intended.

Mr. B. admitted that, in the eye of a regular bred constitutional lawyer, legal currency might imply constitutional currency; but certain it was that the common and popular meaning of the phrase was not limited to constitutional money, but included every currency that the statute law made receivable for debts. Thus, the notes of the Bank of the United States were generally considered as legal currency, because receivable by law in payment of public dues; and in like manner the notes of all specie-paying banks would, under the committee's bill, rise to the dignity of legal currency. The second section of the bill twice used the word "cash;" a word which, however understood at the Bank of England, where it always means ready money, and where ready money signifies gold coin in hand, yet with the banks with which we have to deal it has no such meaning, but includes all sorts of current paper money on band, as well as gold and silver on hand.

Mr. B. verified this statement by reading from the sworn return of the Clinton Bank of Columbus, one of the deposite banks, made to the Legislature of Ohio at their present session, and where the available means of the bank, among other items, has one thus stated: "Cash on hand, viz: Eastern bank notes, $34,521; Western do. This return is $65,700; gold and silver, $136,389." sworn to by Wm. Neil, president, and J. Delafield, jr., cashier, before 'Squire Jenkins, justice of the peace; and it is certified and declared by ten directors of the bank to be correct and accurate; so that no doubt can be entertained that, in the vocabulary of the Clinton Bank of Columbus, the word "cash" signifies Eastern and Western paper, as well as gold and silver; and in this case the vocabulary of that bank is superior to all the dictionaries, for it is a deposite bank, and will have the execution of the act, if it passes, in its own hands, and will decide for itself what is and what is not cash.

[JAN. 27, 1837.

Having shown from this authentic statement that a deposite bank in the West construed cash on band to be bank notes on hand, Mr. B. would now show the same construction made by 130 banks in a lump, and that in a part of the Union where correctness of phraseology was as much or more attended to than in any other part. He spoke of Massachusetts, and of the official return made by all the banks in that State to the Legislature of the State, now in session at Boston. In the consolidated returns of these 130 banks, he found the following items: "Cash deposited, not on interest, $8,784,516; cash deposited, on interest, $6,447,928; gold, silver, and other coin, $1,455,230." Here (said Mr. B.) is the highest evidence that this word "cash," in the vocabulary of our banks, comprehends paper money; and he had no doubt but that proofs to the same effect might be accumulated to any amount. He had not looked out for such proofs; what he had used had fallen into his hands in the common current of his reading, since this bill had been reported. But why look abroad for proofs? Let every gentleman look to his own knowledge. Does he not every day hear the word "cash" used to include paper money? Docs he not daily see sales of property advertised, and the terms stated to be cash; and under these terms is it not understood, by all parties, that ready pay in bank notes, as well as in hard money, are the terms intended? And has the instance ever been heard of, that a bidder going to one of these cash sales thought it necessary to supply himself with gold and silver, under the belief that current bank notes would not be received as cash? Certainly, said Mr. B., the original idea of cash, as used at the Bank of England, where it means British gold coin on hand, in contradistinction to foreign gold coin on hand, which is always called bullion, is now lost in this country; and that paper money is just as fully comprehended now, throughout our country, under the term "cash," as hard money is. But why argue, or look to proofs, or even refer to our own knowledge? Look to the proviso to the second section to the committee's bill, and it will be seen that it is not only the intention of that bill that paper money may be, but that paper money shall be, included under the term "cash." These are the words: " Provided, That if any deposite bank shall refuse to receive, and pass to the credit of the United States, as cash, any notes, receivable under the provisions of this act, which the said bank, in the ordinary course of its business, receives on general deposite, the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby authorized to withdraw the public deposites from said bank." These are the words, and they are not only declaratory of the com mittee's meaning that paper money is to be considered as cash, but is clearly expressive of their purpose, that it shall be received as such. The point to which such an enactment would soon bring the federal finances, Mr. B. said, might be seen in a certificate of general deposite granted by the Clinton Bank of Columbus, of which he would read a copy:

"No. 276. Clinton Bank of Columbus, 31st December, 1836.--B. S. Brown has deposited twelve hundred dollars, subject to the order of himself, payable in currency, and return of this certificate. Signed, &c."

Yes, said Mr. B., currency, payable in currency! such will quickly be the revenues of the Federal Government under this enactment to compel deposite banks to credit current paper as cash.

Mr. B. said it would be sufficient, he should think, to point out the meaning of the words used in the commit. tee's bill, to show that they were susceptible of a consruction by which this hard-money Federal Government, as it was intended to be by its framers, may be changed into a paper-money Government. It would be sufficient to excite apprehension to see the systematic use of these terms, even after objection made to them, and the system

[blocks in formation]

atic exclusion of the terms used in the constitution, even after their insertion is solicited; but all room for mistake vanishes when we come to look to this proviso, and to see that the deposite banks are not only required to credit paper as cash, but are to be punished by a loss of the public deposites if they do not so credit it!

[SENATE.

a most wretched bargain on the part of the United States a bargain in which what she receives is ruinous to her; for the more local paper she receives in payment of her revenues, the worse for her, and the sooner will her Treasury be filled with unavailable funds.

But what is worse is, that in order to make this ruinous bargain-a bargain by which the Treasury would be immediately filled with many ten millions of unavailable funds--we shall have to reject the proper, cheap, speedy, and effectual mode of suppressing these small notes which is now in our power, and not only in our power, but offered and pressed upon us. Mr. B. alluded to the propositions of the deposite banks to effect this suppres sion, not only for themselves, but on other banks also, which were now in the Treasury Department, and waiting the action of the Government. He himself had communicated with a great number of these banks, both personally and by letter, and knew that many of the most respectable deposite banks were not only willing, but ready and anxious to enter into arrangements with the Treasury Department for the effectual and speedy accomplishment of this purpose. Two years ago, he said, the Secretary of the Treasury had addressed a circular letter to the deposite banks, to know if they were wil

the conditions on which they were to retain the public deposites. He held a copy of that circular in his hand, and knew that many favorable answers had been received, and was certain that they presented the ready and far preferable mode of suppressing this small-note circulation.

He

Mr. B. repeated, it was not in Congress only that he had worked at this object; he had communicated with many banks; and, from those of large business and high character, he had invariably received the strongest assurances, not only of a readiness, but of a wish to cooperate with the Government in this good work. would read from one communication, a letter from Mr. Campbell P. White, president of the Manhattan Bank, New York, and would show the resolutions which that gentleman had drawn up and sent to him (Mr. B.) at the commencement of this session, to accomplish this ob ject. This is the extract:

Having remarked upon the phraseology of the bill, and shown that a paper currency, composed of the notes of a thousand local banks, not only might become the currency of the Federal Government, but was evidently intended to be made its currency; and that, in the face of all the protestations of the friends of the administration in favor of re-establishing the national gold currency, Mr. B. would now take up the bill of the committee under two or three other aspects, and show it to be as mistaken in its design as it would be impotent in its effect. In the first place, it transferred the business of suppressing the small-note circulation from the deposite branch to the collecting branch of the public revenue. At present, this business was in a course of progress through the deposite banks, as a condition of holding the public moneys, and, as such, had a place in the deposite act of the last session, and also had a place in the President's message of the last session, where the suppression of paper currency under twenty dollars was expressly refer-ling to give up their small-note circulation, as a part of red to the action of the deposite banks, and as a condition of their retaining the public deposites. It was through the deposite banks, and not through the reception of local bank paper, that the suppression of small notes should be effected. In the next place, he objected to the committee's bill, because it proposed to make a bargain with each of the thousand banks now in the United States, and the hundreds more which will soon be born, and to give them a right--a right by law--to have their notes received at the federal Treasury. He was against such a bargain. He had no idea of making a contract with these thousand banks for the reception of their notes. He had no idea of contracting with them, and giving them a right to plead the constitution of the United States against us, if, at any time, after having agreed to receive their notes, upon condition that they would give up their small circulation, they should choose to say we had impaired the contract by not continuing to receive them; and so either relapse into the issue of this small trash, or have recourse to the judicial process to compel the United States to abide the contract, and continue the reception of all their notes. Mr. B. had no idea of letting down this Federal Government to such petty and inconvenient bargains with a thousand moneyed corporations. The Government of the United States ought to act as a Government, and not as a contractor. It should prescribe conditions, and not make bargains. It should give the law. He was against these bargains, even if they were good ones; but they were bad bargains, wretchedly bad, and ought to be rejected as such, even if all higher and nobler considerations were out of the question. What is the consideration that the United States is to receive? A mere individual agreement with each bank by itself, that in three years it will cease to issue notes under ten dollars, and in five years it will cease to issue notes under twenty dollars. What is the price which she pays for this consideration? In the first place, it receives the notes of such bank as gold and silver at all the land offices, custom-houses, and post offices, of the United States, and, of course, pays them out again as gold and silver to all her debtors. In the next place, it compels the deposite banks to credit them as cash. In the third place, it accredits the whole circulation of the banks, and makes it current all over the United States, in consequence of universal receivability for all federal dues. In other words, it endorses, so far as credit is concerned, the whole circulation of every bank that comes into the bargain thus proposed. This is certainly

"I submit to you two resolutions that I think should be passed by a concurrent vote of the two Houses of Congress. The large amount of specie, above seventy millions of dollars, now in the United States, makes it a favorable moment, if not an imperative duty, to repress the circulation of all bank notes under the denomination

of twenty dollars. As some persons question the con stitutional power, and others the expediency, of resorting to taxation for this purpose, none can object to making it a condition for retaining the public deposites, that the deposite banks shall check and repress the emission of paper, so as to secure to us that portion of the money in circulation in the world which our exchangeable products bear to the whole exchangeable products of the world, and which we should ever enjoy, were it not driven out by the substitution of the shadow for the substance--the substitution of paper for gold and silver."

This is the extract of the letter, (said Mr. B.,) and the sentiments in it are worthy of the gentleman who, as a former member of Congress, was one of those most instrumental in reviving the gold circulation, by taking a lead in correcting the erroneous standard of our gold. The following are the two resolutions communicated at the same time:

"Resolved, That from and after the 4th day of July, 1837, no bank shall be employed, or continued in the employment of the Treasury of the United States as a deposite bank, unless they shall previously engage, in writing, under their corporate seal, to issue and put in

« AnteriorContinuar »