...protected from crime, the Court said : "We believe no fixed rule with respect to disclosure is justifiable. The problem is one that calls for balancing the public...prepare his defense. Whether a proper balance renders disclosure erroneous must depend on the particular circumstances of each case, taking into consideration...

...individual of as full an opportunity to answer the charges as is available in judicial proceedings. "The problem is one that calls for balancing the public...against the individual's right to prepare his defense." Itoviaro v. United States, 353 US 53, 62. As we have indicated above, the executive department has...

...must give way. * * * * * * We believe that no fixed rule with respect to disclosure is justifiable. The problem is one that calls for balancing the public...against the individual's right to prepare his defense. 2 That section provides in part as follows: A genuine privilege * * * must be recognized for the identity...

...privilege must give way. * * * * We believe that no fixed rule with respect to disclosure is justifiable. The problem is one that calls for balancing the public...against the individual's right to prepare his defense. 2 That section provides in part as follows: A genuine privilege * * must be recognized for the identify...

...has held that whether disclosure is essential to the continuing viability of the • case depends on "balancing the public interest in protecting the flow...against the individual's right to prepare his defense." Roviaro v. United .States, 353 US 53, 62 (1957). Thus the defendant may not compel dismissal when the...

...Court has held that whether disclosure is essential to the continuing viability of the case depends on "balancing the public interest in protecting the flow...against the individual's right to prepare his defense." Roviaro v. United States. 353 US 53. 62 (1957). Thus the defendant may not compel dismissal when the...

...determination of a cause . . . ."187 The decision to grant the privilege in any particular case is made after "balancing the public interest in protecting the flow...information against the individual's right to prepare his defense."188 The third context in which the individual citizen requires the protection of confidentiality...

...Privilege," by Melvin Gutterman (March 1967). "The problem (of disclosing the informer's identity) is one that calls for balancing the public interest...in protecting the flow of information against the fundamental principle that an individual accused of a crime is entitled to a full and fair opportunity...

...to the defendant's case."82 We believe that no fixed rule with respect to disclosure is justifiable. The problem is one that calls for balancing the public...information against the individual's right to prepare one's defense. Whether a proper balance renders nondisclosure erroneous must depend on the particular...

...police informant or ensuring the timely identification of defense witnesses — a court must "balance[e] the public interest in protecting the flow of information...against the individual's right to prepare his defense." . . . Here, the district court failed to give any serious consideration to the required balancing....