The Last Conceptual Revolution: A Critique of Richard Rorty's Political Philosophy

Capa
SUNY Press, 01/01/1999 - 235 páginas
In 1989, with the publication of Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, and in articles throughout the 1990s, Richard Rorty developed a detailed social and political philosophy that brings together core elements in liberalism, pragmatism, and postmodern, anti-foundationalist philosophy. The Last Conceptual Revolution provides a critique both of Rorty's own provocative political philosophy, as well as an in-depth look at the issues concerning the relationship between the public and the private; between persuasion and force; and arguments about the role of reason in liberal political discourse generally.
 

Índice

Locating Rortys Utopia
19
The End of Philosophy
20
The Beginning of Irony
37
Liberalism Above and Below the Surface
63
Liberalism and Cruelty
64
Liberalism and Humiliation
78
Liberalism Humiliation and the Ironist Self
95
Sticks and Speech Is There a Difference?
115
Universality Transparency and Truth
146
Answering Hitler
161
Characters and Citizenship A Literary Redescription
169
Philosophy versus Literature
170
Characters and Their Worldviews
176
Richard RortyInscrutable to the Last
216
Index
227
Direitos de autor

Liberalism and Reason
118

Outras edições - Ver tudo

Palavras e frases frequentes

Passagens conhecidas

Página 2 - liberal democracy. What we may be witnessing is not just the end of the Cold War, or the passing of a particular period of postwar history, but the end of history as such; that is, the end point of mankind's ideological evolution and the universalization of Western liberal democracy as the final form of human government.
Página 12 - each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others.”
Página x - He who knows only his side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion.

Acerca do autor (1999)

Eric M. Gander is Assistant Professor in the Department of Speech at Baruch College, City University of New York, where he teaches classes in persuasion and politics.

Informação bibliográfica