But this does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court in which the original judgment was given, to pronounce it; or the right of the State itself to exercise authority over the person or the subject-matter. Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of ... - Página 87por Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, James Buckley Black, Michael Crawford Kerr, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1860Visualização integral - Acerca deste livro
| Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1869 - 864 páginas
...be given in each State to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other State, "does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court, in which the original judgment was rendered, to pronounce the judgment, nor an inquiry into the right of the... | |
| Joseph Story - 1841 - 966 páginas
...inquiry into the jurisdiction of the Court in which the original judgment was rendered, to pronounce the judgment, nor an inquiry into the right of the State to exercise authority over the parties, or the subjectdence, pt. 2, § 67 ; Phillips & Amos on Evidence (8th edit.), pp. 537, 538,... | |
| Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1851 - 860 páginas
...CONTINUED. in every other State. It is therefore put upon the same footing as a domestic judgment. But this does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court, in which the original judgment -was given, to pronounce it, or the right of ihe State itself to exercise authority... | |
| Georgia. Supreme Court - 1888 - 946 páginas
...which the judgments of sister states are entitled by the constitution and laws of the United States) "does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court in which the original judgment was rendered to pronounce the judgment, nor an inquiry into the right of the... | |
| Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1850 - 712 páginas
...have the same faith and credit in other states, as they have in the state where they are rendered, do not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court in which the original judgment was rendered; nor an inquiry into the right of 616 CASES IN LAW AND EQUITY Noyes... | |
| Asa Kinne - 1852 - 392 páginas
...26th May. 1790, eh. 11. They are therefore put upon the same footing as domestic judgments. But this does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court, in which the original judgment was rendered, to pronounce the judgment, nor an inquiry into the right of the... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1907 - 832 páginas
...where they are rendered. They are therefore put upon the same footing as domestic judgments. But this does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court in which the original judgment was rendered to pronounce the judgment, nor an inquiry into the right of the... | |
| Joseph Story - 1857 - 1102 páginas
...inquiry into the jurisdiction of the Court in which the original judgment was rendered, to pronounce the judgment, nor an inquiry into the right of the State to exercise au* thority over the parties, or the subject-matter, nor an ' inquiry, whether the judgment is founded... | |
| John Codman Hurd - 1862 - 888 páginas
...Duryee, Ac., he adds: — " It is, therefore, put upon the saтe footing as a domestic judgment. But this does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court, in which the original judgment was given, to pronounce it, or the right of the State itself to exercise authority... | |
| Austin Abbott - 1864 - 602 páginas
...(§ 1, Art. 4) has no application to judgments of the Federal courts. But if it were applicable, " it does not prevent an inquiry into the jurisdiction of the court, in which the original judgment was given, to pronounce it." (Story on the Const., § 1313 ; Bessell a. Briggs,... | |
| |