Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub

a Humble-bee took possession of the nest, and adapted it to her own purpose. He was unfortunately unable to identify the species by capturing a specimen, the nest having been destroyed; but Dr. Bell saw the Bee on one occasion, and observed that it was black, with yellow bands, probably the Bombus pratorum.”

Moss, however, is the favorite material of the Carder Bees, and, wherever it can be obtained, they will use no other substance, though in places where it is scarce, or not to be found, they employ leaves, grass, or any other suitable material. Whatever may be the material, the Bee always takes great pains to disentangle the fibres, in order to be able to weave them in a systematic manner into the nest. This process is conducted by means of the legs, the Bee seizing the fibre with her fore feet, and passing it under her body by means of the remaining pairs of legs, forming it, as she does so, into a small bundle which can be easily carried off.

[ocr errors]

The object of the moss and other substances is very simple. The Carder Bees do not build their nests, like those of many Humble bees, beneath the surface of the ground, but upon it, choosing a spot where there is a slight hollow of an inch or two in depth. The moss is then woven so as to form a domed cover to the cells, this dome being of variable dimensions, according to the number of cells which it covers, but seldom reaching more than three or four inches in height above the ground. As in very rainy weather this mossy dome would not be water-proof, the insects line it with a very coarse, dark-colored wax, similar to that of which the breeding cells are made.

The entrance to the nest is always at the bottom; for, although the insects will sometimes make an opening at the top, they seem to do so merely for the purpose of admitting air and warmth, and never enter or leave the nest through it, closing it at night or in rainy weather. Generally Generally a kind of tunnel or arched entrance leads into the nest, like the passage into an Esquimaux snowhouse, an edifice to which the moss-covered dome of the Carder Bee bears no small resemblance.

The best time to search for these Bees is in the hay-making season, when the scythe-men often come upon them during their work; and a promise of some small reward for this or any other structure will probably produce a tolerable harvest of nests as well as of hay.

CHAPTER XXV.

PARASITIC NESTS.

Various Parasites.-Parasitic Birds.-The CUCKOO and its Kin.-The COW-BIRD and its Nest.-Size of its Egg.-Comparison between the Cuckoo and the Apteryx.-The EPYORNIS.-The BLUE-FACED HONEY-EATER or BATIKIN.-General Habits of the Bird.-Singular Mode of Nesting.-The SPARROW-HAWK and its parasitic Habits.-The KESTREL, its Quarrel with a Magpie.-The PURPLE GRAKLE OF CROW BLACKBIRD.-Its curious Alliance with the Osprey.—Wilson's Account of the two Birds.-The SPARROW as a Parasite.-Curious Behavior of the STORK.-Parasitic Insects. The ICHNEUMON FLIES. - The Parasite of the CABBAGE CATERPILLAR. -Its Numbers and Mode of making its Habitation. Trap-doors of the Cells.-The Australian Cocoon and its Parasites.-The OAKEGGER MOTH, its Cocoons and Enemies.-The Puss MOTH.-Its remarkable Cocoon.-Powerful Jaws of the Parasite.-RUBY-TAILED FLIES and their Victims.Modes of Usurpation.-The CUCKOO FLIES or Tachina.-Parasites within Pupæ. -Parasites on Vegetables.--The GALL FLIES and their Home.-British Galls, their Shapes, Structures, and Authors.--Foreign Galls, and their Uses.

[ocr errors]

WE now pass to another branch of this inexhaustible subject, and come to those creatures that are indebted to other beings for their homes. In some cases the habitation is simply usurped from the rightful proprietors, who are either driven out by main force or are ousted by gradual encroachment. In other cases the deserted tenement of one animal is seized upon by another, which either inhabits it at once, or makes a few alterations, and so converts it to its own purposes. In many instances, however, the habitation of the parasite is found within the animal itself; and in some cases the entire body forms the habitation of the parasite.

Several examples of the first description of parasites have already been given under other headings; for instance, where the puffin invades the rabbit-burrows, and drives out the rabbits by dint of courage and a powerful beak; or where the Coquimbo owl and rattlesnake take possession of the homes which had been excavated by the prairie dog. Examples of the second description of parasites have also been given. The kingfisher, for instance, usurps the deserted hole of a water-shrew; and the humble-bee and wasp usually take advantage of the deserted burrow of some rat or mouse. In the account of the sociable weaver

bird, mention is also made of certain little green parrots, which are apt to take possession of the great nest, and use it for their own purpose. And in the last chapter an example was mentioned where a carder bee established herself in the deserted nest of a wren, and so saved herself the trouble of fetching materials and building a dome.

BIRDS of various kinds are notorious parasites, the Cuckoos ranking as chief among them, inasmuch as they make no nest at all, but simply lay their eggs in the nests of other birds, and foist upon them a supposititious offspring, which occupies the entire nest, and monopolizes all the care of its foster-parents.

All Cuckoos, however, do not possess this habit; for some of the group build nests which are remarkable for their beauty, and tend their young as carefully as do any birds. The celebrated Honey-finders, for example, which are found in most hot portions of the globe, are notable for their skill in architecture. The nests of these birds are pensile, and not unlike those of the African weaver birds, which have already been described. They are made of tough bark, torn into filaments, and are flask-like in shape, hung from the branches of trees, and having their entrance from below.

Then there is the well-known COW-BIRD of America (Coccygus Americanus), which is closely allied to the common cuckoo, and yet which builds its own nest, and rears its own young. "Early in May," writes Wilson, "they begin to pair, when obstinate battles take place among the males. About the 10th of that month they commence building. The nest is usually fixed among the horizontal branches of an apple-tree; sometimes in a solitary thorn, crab, or cedar, in some retired part of the woods. It is constructed with little art, and scarcely any concavity, of small sticks and twigs, intermixed with green weeds and blossoms of the common maple. On this almost flat bed the eggs, usually three or four in number, are placed; these are of a uniform greenish-blue color, and of a size proportionate to that of the bird.

"While the female is sitting, the male is generally not very far distant, and gives the alarm by his notes when any person is approaching. The female sits so close that you may almost reach her with your hand, and then precipitates herself to the ground, feigning lameness, fluttering, trailing her wings, and tumbling over, in the manner of the partridge, woodcock, and many

other species. Both parents unite in providing food for the young."

In this narrative two points are especially worthy of notice. In the first place, the egg of the Cow-bird is proportionate in size to the bird which laid it. Now, one of the most remarkable facts connected with the history of the common cuckoo is, that although the bird is as large as a small hawk, its egg is scarcely half as large as that of a thrush or blackbird, as indeed is needful for its admission into the nest of a hedge sparrow or redstart.

Here, then, we have an example of a bird laying an egg which is extremely small in proportion to its own size, while in the apteryx, or kiwi-kiwi of New Zealand, we have an example of a bird laying an egg which is absolutely gigantic in proportion to its own size. The apteryx is not a large bird, certainly not larger than a Guinea-fowl, and yet its egg looks like that of a swan, and weighs just one quarter as much as the bird which produced it. Thus it is evident that the dimensions of an egg afford no certain criterion respecting the size of the bird that laid it; and although a large bird usually lays a large egg, and a small bird lays a little one, the cases may be reversed, as in the instance just. mentioned.

All naturalists are familiar with the gigantic egg laid by some bird unknown, and called by the provisional name of Æpyornis, or "tall bird." This egg makes that of the ostrich itself shrink into insignificance, for its lineal measurement is precisely double that of a large ostrich egg, and its cubic bulk is eight times as great. In fact, the æpyornis egg looks as gigantic by the side of an ostrich egg as does an ostrich egg near that of a duck. It was therefore imagined that the æpyornis must be at least eight times as large as the ostrich, and a height of sixteen feet was attributed to the unknown bird.

Now it is easy to work out this problem by the rule of three, and to give the result in figures; but when that result is compared with existing facts, it becomes startling. On paper, a height of sixteen feet for an ostrich-like bird seems rather gigantic, but does not appear to carry with it any idea of its real magnitude. The height of a very fine ostrich being about seven or eight feet, we say that the æpyornis must be twice as tall as an ostrich, and so dismiss the subject from our minds. But when we come to compare the imaginary bird with actually existing beings, we shall better understand the dimensions of a bird that measured

sixteen feet in height. Sixteen feet is the average height of the adult giraffe, the females varying from thirteen to sixteen feet, and the males from fifteen to eighteen.

It is impossible to say that there never was a bird, as large as a giraffe, but all our present knowledge controverts such an idea. If, however, we keep in mind the comparative dimensions of the apteryx and its egg, we must be prepared to find that the æpyornis, although necessarily a large bird, may not be larger than an ostrich, and need not be so large.

Thus, then, the comparative size of an egg is by no means an unimportant fact in natural history, and the comparison of two such birds as the apteryx and the cuckoo may at least save us from the danger of generalizing too hastily.

The second point in the history of the Cow-bird is its love for its young, which is quite equal to the affection that is manifested by the lapwing and other birds that endanger themselves in order to draw attention away from their offspring, and directly opposed to the indifference toward the young which seems to actuate the ordinary cuckoo.

IN Australia there is a large group of rather pretty birds, popularly called Honey-eaters, because they feed largely on the sweet juices of many flowers, although the staple of their diet consists of insects. They seem, indeed, to occupy in Australia the posi tion which is taken in America by the humming-birds, and by the sunbirds of the Old World. To this group belong many familiar and interesting species, such as that which produces a sound like the tinkling of a bell, and is, in consequence, called the Bell Bird; the different species of Wattle Birds; the odd, baldheaded Friar Birds, and the splendidly decorated Poe Birds.

One species of it, which comes in the present section, is the BLUE-FACED HONEY-EATER of New South Wales, called by the natives BATIKIN (Entomyza cyanotis). It is a pretty bird, the plumage being marked boldly with black and white, and a patch of bare skin round the eyes being bright azure. This peculiarity has earned for the bird the specific title of cyanotis, or "blueeared."

Like all the Honey-eaters, it is a most lively and interesting bird, and to the careful observer affords an endless fund of amusement. It is never still, but traverses the branches with astonishing celerity, skipping from one to another, probing every crevice

« AnteriorContinuar »