Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub

ors VS.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Haye, adm'r, The Mayor and Coun- McCauley, Pledger and Pledger vs. 40 cil of Macon vs. 590 McColgan vs. McKay,

031 Hayno et al. vs. Perry for use, &c., 400 McDonald, Smith vs.

377 Hicks & Co., DeLongchamp vs. 200 McGuire et al. vs. Johnson

604 Hill ve. Mitchell, 704 McKinnon, Edwards vs.

337 Hincb vs. The State, 699 McKay, McColgan vs.

631 Hines and Bryan vs. Mullins, Ordi- Mckee, Irwin vs.

646 Dary,

696 McKinney, Hand & Cook, less. Holliday vs. Riodan, 629

648 Holman vs. Carbart Bros. & Co., 608 McKenzie vs. Downing, ex'or., 669 Hopkins vs. Tillman, 212 McLeroy vs. McLeroy,

100 Horton & Rikeman vs. Moyers, 89 McLendon et UX.

et House Vs. House, 473 Woodward et al.

252 Hughes, Parker vs.

374 McLeod et al. vs. The Savannah, Humpbries vs. McWhorter &

Albany & Gull R. R. Co. 445 Brightwell, 37 McLelland vs. The State,

477 Hutchins & co, vs, W. & A. R. R.

61 | McLaren vs. Long, adm’rx. 708 I.

McMillan et al. vs. Lawrence, Irwin vs. McKee, 646 Smith & Whilden,

189 J. McWorther & Brightwell, Hum

37 Jackson vs. Paxson,

phries vs. 35

251 Jackson et al. vs. Jones et al.,

Meadows, Bird vs.

93 Johnson vs. Martin et al. 268 Mickleberry & Mobley vs. Shan.

237 Johnson vs. Crawley,

non, adm'r.,
316
Mitchell vs. Printup,

182 Johnson, Wade, ex'or, vs. 231

346 Johnson et al., Poulett et ux. vs.

Mitchell vs. Gillespie, 403

704 Johnson, Parker vs.

Mitchell, Hill vs. 576

381 Johnson, McGuire et al. vs.

Moody vs. Morgan, 604

381 Johnson & Co. vs. Mechanics &

Morgan, Moody vs.

89 Sayings Bank,

Moyers, Horton & Rikeman vs.

643 Jones et al., Jackson et al. vs.

93
Mullins, Ordinary, Hines & Bryan

696 Jones, ex'or of Jones, ex parte, 414 Jones vs. The Mayor and Coun

N cil of Columbus,

610 Nicholson, Williams & Co. vs. 560 Jordan, Smith vs.

687 | Nolan, ex'ors. of, vs. Bolion et al. 352 K.

132 North vs. Asheraft & Ashcraft, Norwell, Freeman vs.

359 Keaton vs. Scott,

652

0 Killiam vs. Killiam, 186

217

Oliver et al, ys. Williams, King vs. Armstrong,

264 L.

P Lafitte vs Lawton, 305 Parker, Pyron vs.

17 Lane, Simmons et al. vs. 178 Parker vs. Hughes,

374 Larrimore et al vs. Chastain, 592 Parker vs. Johuson, adm'r., 576 Laughter vs.Butt, adm'r,

177 Paxson, adı'r., Jackson vs.. 35 Lavinia and Wilkes, (slaves,) The Pearce vs. Vaughn,

27 State vs.

311 Perry, for the use &c., Hayne et Lawrence, Smith & Whilden, Mc

al. vs.

400 Millan et al. V8.

189 Pledger & Pledger vs. McCauley, 46 Lawton, Lafitte vs.

305 Poulett el ux. vs. Johnson et al. 403 Lewis vs. Wayne, adm'r, 167 Powell, adm'r., Bigby vs.

244 Linton & Co. vs. Williams, 391 Price vs. The State,

133 Lloyd & Pulliam vs. Wright, Grif- Printup, trustee, vs. Trammell

240 fith & Co., 215 Pryor, Stancel. vs.

40 Long, adm’x, McLaren vs. 708 Pyron vs. Parker,

17

R
M.

Red vs. The City Council &c., of Mansfield, Christian vs. 628 Augusta,

386 Markham, Alexander vs. 148 Reid vs. Butt, adni'r.

28 Markbam vs. The State,

52 Renwick & Cobb, Sims, Ordinary Martin et al., Jobnson vs.

268 Martin vs. The State,

494 Richardson Hartsfield & Co., Do. Mathews & Mathews, Caraker vs. 571 zier adm'r. vs.

90 May, Rodgers, Sheriff, vs, 463 Richardson & Ketchum, Sullivan Mayo, Dennard and Kearsey vs. 681

VS.

.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

58

[ocr errors]

134 Red vs.

193

65

Richardson, Gragg vs.

566 | The Rome Railroad Co. vs. Sulli.
Richardson vs. Roberts,

671
van, Caboi & Co.

228
Riodan, Hollida; vs.

629 " City Council &c. of Augusta,
Rives, guardian. os Sneed. 612

386
Roberts, Rirhardson vs.

671 “ Savannah, Albany and Guit
Robinson, Brown & Bowen vs. 144 Railroad Co. McLeod et al. vs. 445
Rogers, Sheriff, vs, May, 413 " Southero Bank of Georgia vs.
Rooks, adm'r. &c., Bryan, ex'or.

Williains,

534

&c. vs.

622 “Mayor and Council of Macon

Ross vs. Ross et al.

297 vs. Hays, adm'r.

590

Russell vs. Slaton,

“ Mayor and Council of Colum-

Russell vs. Arnold,

625 bus, Jones vs.

610

s

“ Mechanic's and Savings Bank,

Johngon & Co. vs.

643

Sanders vs. Ward et al.

109
Thomas vs. Ellis,

137
Scoit, Keaton vs.

652
Thomas, Dearing vs.

223
Shelton et al vs. Wright, adm'r. 636

Thornton (a slave) vs. The State 301
Simmons et al. vs. Lane,

178
Tillman. Hopkins vs.

212

Sims, Ordinary, vs. Renwick &

Trammel, Printup, irustee, vs. 240

Cobb,

58

Turman vs. The State,

220

Slaton, Russell vs.

193
Smith vs. McDonald,

377

V
Sinith, Ford vs.
675 Vaughn, Pearce vs.

27

Smith vs. Jordan,

67

W.

Sneed, Rivex, guardian vs.
612

331
Stamper el al. vs. Hays,

546 Wade, ex'or, vs. Johnson,
Stancell vs. Pryor,

40 Waldo, Barry & Co.. Strauss vs. 611

Strauss vs. Wallo, Barry & Co. 641 Walker, ex'or., vs. Walker et al.

76

Strickland, adm'r, vs. Dent, 42 Walker vs Walker, adm'r. &c.,

Siringtield vs. The State,

474

141

Walker, guardian, vs. Wells,

Sullivan vs. Richardson & Ketch- Walker et al. vs. Walker, ex'or. 257

154 Walker el al vs. Walker, ex'ors 420

um,

Sullivan, Cabot & Co. The Rome Walker et al. ex'ors. vs. William-

Railroad vs.

228

son et al.

549

Summerford. Chance vs.

662 Ward et al. Sanders vs.

109

Sution vs. Sution.

353 Warner vs. Graves et al.

369

Warnock vs. Watson et al.

69

467

Symmes, Woods vs.

Wayne, adm'r. Lewis vs.

169

T

Waison et al., Wardock vs. 467

Taylor & Lowther, Hardaway vs. 703 Weed vs. Davis,

684

The State, Markham vs.

52 Wells, Walker, guardian, vs. 141

Price vs.
133 Whilden ys. The State,

396

Turner et al. vs. 146 | Whitehead et al., Elder vs. 262

Hawkins vs.

207 Williams, Oliver et al. vs. 217

Turman vs.

220 Williams, Linton & Co. vs.

391

vs. Woodley,

235 Williams, the Southere Bank of

Thornton (a slave) vs. 301

Ga. Vs.

534

vs. Lavinia and Wilkes Williams & Co. vs. Nicholson,

560

(slaves)

311 Williamson et al., Walker et al.,

Whilden vs.

396 ex'ors vs.

549

Siringfield vs.

474 Woods vs. Symmes,

60

McLelland vs.

477 | Woodley, The State vs.

235

Martin vs.

494 Woodward et al., McLendon et ux.

Conner vs.

515

et al. vs.

252

Golden vs.

527 Worrill, ex'or., vs. Wright, adm'r. 657

Galloway ve.

596 Wright, Gritith & Co., Lloyd &

Geiger vs.

667

Pulliam, vs.

215

Camp vs.

693

Wright, adm'r. Shelton et al. vs. 6.36

Hinch vs.

699 Wright, adm'r. Worrill, ex'or. vs. 657

The Western and Atlantic Rail.

road, Hutchins & Co. vs. 61

.

.

:

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]

Sullivan vs. Richardson & Ketchum. Practice. Dis.

charge of bail. Surrender of principal,

154

Hamilton vs. Conyers. New trial, amendment of

motion for. Brief of evidence. Rule of Court. Ab-

sence of counsel,

158

Lewis vs. Wayne, adm'r. Payment of drafts. Pre-

sumption as to how, and by whom paid,

167

Laughter vs. Butt, adm'r, Pleading. Amendments. 177

Simmons vs. Lane. Ejectment. Evidence. Color of

title,

178

Mitchell vs. Printup. New trial. Newly discovered

evidence. Impeachment of witnesses,

182

Fain vs. Cornett, adm'x. Evidence. Ambiguity of

charge of the Court.
New trial,

184

Killiam vs. Killiam. Divorce. Separation by agree-

ment. Maintenance. Alimony. Counsel fees, 186

McMillan et al. vs. Lawrence et al. Frivolous appeals.

Damages,

- 189

Russell vs. Slaton, Practice. Interlineations. Judg-

ments. Parties and privies to. Adverse possession.

Statute of limitations,

193

DeLongchamp vs. Hicks & Co. Bail. Liability of

Sheriff,

200

Goodwyn vs. Goodwyn. Trover. Proof of judgments

from other States,

203

Hawkins vs. The State. Murder. Evidence. Provo-

cation by threats. Malice,

207

Hopkins vs. Tilman. New trial. Evidence.

212

Lloyd & Pulliam vs. Wright, Griffeth & Co. Delivery

and acceptance of goods. Statutes of frauds, 215

Oliver et al. vs. Williams. Ejectment. Possession, 217

Thurman vs. The State. City Criminal Courts. Con-

stitutional law. Juries,

220

Dearing vs. Thomas. Insolvents. Real estate exempt

from levy and sale. Allowance of money in lieu of, 223

Dickerson vs. Burke. Relevancy of testimony. Prom-

issory note. Transfer of Practice,

225

« AnteriorContinuar »