Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub

feet in gratitude for his faithful discharge of his trust, praising God who was glorified in his servant.*

In wars of ambition, subjugated cities, after the ebullition of military lawlessness, become the possessions of the victorious state and public. But in the Crusades each soldier fought from personal motives; and the cause of the war, and not submission to authority, was the princiciple of union. Personal interest frequently prevailed; and, accordingly, each Crusader became the owner of any particular house on the portal of which he had set his buckler. But the treasures of the mosques were converted to the use of the church and of the poor; and among the splendid spoils of two of the principal temples, were seventy large chandeliers, fifty of silver, and the remainder of gold.‡

The massacre of the Saracens, on the capture of the Holy City, did not proceed from the inflamed passions of victorious soldiers, but from remorseless fanaticism. Benevolence to Turks, Jews, infidels, and heretics, was no part of the piety of the day; and, as the Muselmans in their consciences believed that it was the will of Heaven that the religion of Muhammed

The

should be propagated by the sword, so the Christians were under the mental delusion that they were the ministers of God's wrath on disobedient man. Latins, on the day after the victory, massacred three hundred men, to whom Tancred and Gaston de Bearn had promised protection, and had given a standard as a warrant for their safety. Though the religion of Tancred was as cruel as that of his comrades, though his deadly sword had explored every corner of the mosque of Omar, yet he respected the sacredness of his word; and nothing but the interposition of the other chiefs prevented him from retaliating on the murderers. It was resolved that no pity should be shown to the Muselmans; and the most humane justified the determination by the opinion, that, in conjunction with the Saracens of Egypt, they might molest the Christians, and recover the city. The subjugated people were therefore dragged into the public places, and slain as victims. Women with children at the breast, girls and boys, all were slaughtered.* The squares, the streets, and even the uninhabited places of Jerusalem, again were strewed with the dead bodies of men and women, and the mangled limbs of children. No heart melted into compassion or expanded into bene

The patriarch had lately returned from Cyprus. This account of the religious proces-volence. sion of the Crusaders I have taken almost verbatim from the Archb. of Tyre, 760-1, and the Gesta Francorum, 576. The other historians add little to the narrative of the Archbishop; but they are unanimous in placing the time when the circumstance occurred on the very day of the capture of the city, and immediately after the first massacre. The Archbishop seems to have been incorrect in placing it on the following

morning.

One writer (the second anonymous in Bongarsius, p. 577) says, that in consequence of the soldiers of Raymond being the last who entered the town, they had not the usual share of the spoil; and that they piled the dead bodies of the Saracens into heaps, and burnt them, in hopes of finding some pieces of gold and silver among the ashes. Ralph of Caen always describes the Provençals of Raymond as mercenary and selfish. In vulgar phrase, they were the Jews of the army. "Franci ad bella. Provinciales ad victualia," was a proverb among the Christians. Rad. Cad. p. 306.

Malmsbury, p. 443, though a great admirer of Tancred, charges him with having appropriated to himself some of the contents of the temple of Solomon; but that afterwards, reproved by his own conscience, and the reproaches of other people, he restored them.

The city was washed, and the melancholy task was performed by some Saracenian slaves. No contemporary rejoiced out of general regard to humanity; but every one condemned the count of Tholouse, whose avarice was more alive than his superstition, and whose favourite passion made him save and conduct to Ascalon the only few Muselmans, except the slaves, who escaped the general butchery. The synagogues were set on fire, and the Jews perished in the flames.

Christiani sic neci totum laxaverant animum, ut non sugens masculus aut fæmina nedum infans unius anni vivens manum percussoris evaderet. Albert, 283. As Fuller says, "This second massacre was no slip of an extemporary passion, but a studied and preme. ditated act.". "Besides, the execution was merciless, upon sucking children, those not speaking spake for them; and on women, whose weakness is a shield to defend them against a valiant man." Fuller, Holy War, book i. ch. 24.

+ This account of the siege of Jerusalem has been taken (frequently a mere verbal translation) from the original writers, or their immediate

CHAPTER VII.

sy; for, surrounded by Muselman foes, the new inhabitants of Jerusalem could

the state of the HOLY LAND AFTER THE alone preserve their independence by

FIRST CRUSADE.

Foundation of the Latin kingdom of Jerusalem.

-Succession of kings between the first and second Crusades.-Godfrey. Baldwin I Baldwin II.—Fulk.—Baldwin III.-Political history of the kingdom of Jerusalem.-Limits of the kingdom.-Military history.-Mode of warfare.-Supplement to the first Crusade.-Death of the count of Tholouse.-Foundation

of the county of Tripoli.-History of that state.-Affairs of Antioch.-History of Edessa. —The Courtenay family-Fall of Edessa.-

Vain attempt to recover it.

JERUSALEM was in the hands of the Christians; the sepulchre was redeemed, and the blood of the Moslems atoned for profanation. The coolest policy must approve the conduct of the vanquishers subsequently to the capture of the city, though it was the result of martial phren

extending their territory. A Christian kingdom was raised, and the laws, language, and manners of Europe were A minute and planted in Palestine. chronological history of the battles and sieges in which the Latins were involved, would be neither profitable nor disagreeable; but a full and distinct knowledge may be gained of the effects of the first Crusade, if we separate the military from the civil transactions, and regard the natural relations of things rather than the order of time. The political history of Palestine forms the subject of the present chapter. The next will comprise a view of the constitution and laws of the Latins, and some religious and military institutions which distinguished the newly established kingdom.

On the eighth day after the capture of the Holy City, the princes assembled for the august purpose of electing a monarch. The deliberations were interrupted by several of the clergy, as representatives of the bishop of Calbaria and Arnold, one of whom was ambitious of the patriarchate of Jerusalem, and the other of the bishoprick of Bethlehem. The meddling priests confessed the propriety of electing a king, but declared that precedence should accompany rank, and that as spiritual things were more worthy than those of a temporal nature,

abridgments in Bongarsius, Gesta, 27, 28. Robert, 74, 76. Baldric, 132, 134. Raimond, 175, 178, the first thirty-one chapters of the sixth book of Albert of Aix, Guibert, 533, 537, the second Gesta, 573, 577, and the eighth book of William of Tyre. Add to these, Ordericus Vitalis, 756. Mus. Ital. i. 223, 226. Ralph of Caen, 324, &c. Malmsbury, 443, &c., and M. Paris, 41. The Archbishop of Tyre, only mentions one massacre: that in the temple of Solomon, in which ten thousand men fell. He justifies it on the argument, that the Saracens deserved punishment for their profanation of the holy places. He then says, there were about the same number killed in the streets. There is no doubt that the Christians murdered the Muselmans from principle. In the middle ages the vice of intolerance attacked the lives of men : in latter times it has, with more humanity and refinement, distributed their rights and possessions only. The total number of the Moslem victims is not mentioned by the Latin writers. Aboulmahasen, one of De Guignes' authorities (Hist. des Huns, &c. vol. ii. p 99), says, that one hundred thousand people perished in the mosques of Sakra and Akra, and one hundred thousand were made prisoners; the aged and infirm were killed, and the women became captives. These general expressions are as useful as "the sands of the sea," and "the stars of the Heaven," of the Greek authors. The Chris- In strict propriety, the word Crusade is aptians made no prisoners; and Albert is decisive plicable to the state of every Christian who asthat in the days of chivalry women were assassi-sumed the badge of the cross, travelled to the nated. Abulfeda (vol. iii. p. 519, ed. Reiske) | Holy Land, and fought with the infidels. But coolly says, that the massacre lasted seven days, I shall use the word in the confined sense of and that seventy thousand persons were killed in the mosque of Omar. But Aboulmahasen and Abulfeda lived many years after the event, and only wrote from incorrect tradition.

The language of the Latin Christians in Palestine was the same as that which was spoken in Northern France, and which was carried by the Normans into England, and superseded the Anglo Saxon. It was a dialect of the Romane or Romance language, and was called the French Romane, in distinction from the other dialect called the Provençal Romane. As another name of the latter was afterwards an important territorial distinction, I may remind the reader that in the provinces to the south of the Loire the affirmative yes was expressed by the word oc, in the north it was called oil: and hence Dante has named the southern language, langue d'oc; and the northern, langue d'oil.

those great or national armaments which went to Palestine at the instigation of the Pope, or of a general council, and in consequence of some important political event in the east.

the choice of a patriarch should take struggle for supremacy between the

place before that of a monarch.* The princes treated this intrusion with contempt; and it was resolved that personal merit should be rewarded by royal dignities. The rank, family, and possessions of the chieftains were known to each other; but private morals and manners are visible only to friends and domestics. † The inquiry was made, and Godfrey's virtues were declared to be pre-eminent. The princes conducted him in religious and stately order to the church which covered the tomb of Christ: but he refused to wear a diadem in a city where his Saviour had worn a crown of thorns: and modestly avowed, that the honour of becoming the defender and advocate of the holy sepulchre, was all that he aspired to. §

A year wanting five days was the term of the short reign of Godfrey. His tomb was not only watered by the tears of his friends, but was honoured by the lamentations of many of the Muselmans, whose affections his virtues had conciliated. The church of the holy sepulchre received his ashes, and it was decreed that that place should be the repository of the kings his successors. On his death there arose a

* The archbishop of Tyre admits the force of the general reasoning involved in this declaration, but is indignant that such arguments should be used as a mere cloak to ambition. He every where censures Arnold for profligate manners; and Raimond d'Agiles says, that the debaucheries of this priest were the subjects of the songs

of the army.

Godfrey's friends gave a singular proof of his religious disposition. He was fond of remaining in church after the termination of the service; his attendants were tired and impatient; and his excessive devotion often spoiled the dinArchb. of Tyre, 764.

ner.

"As for the knowing of men, which is at second-hand from reports: men's weakness and faults are best known from their enemies, their virtues and abilities from their friends, their customs and crimes from their servants, their conceits and opinions from their familiar friends, with whom they discourse most. General fame is light, and the opinions conceived by superiors or equals are deceitful; for to such, men are more masked. Verior fama è domesticis emanat." Bacon, on the Advancement of Knowledge, book 2. Works, vol. i. p. 203, edit. 1803. See Appendix, note K.

Albert, 299. Guibert, 554. William, 775. Godfrey was only forty years old at the time of his death.

as

clerical and secular powers. The claims of the church to the possession of all divine and human authority were transferred from the west to the east. Godfrey, Bohemond, and Baldwin, had been invested by the patriarch with rule over their several states, and the artful churchman contended, that God had been the conqueror of Jerusálem, God was its king, and that he, as Heaven's vicegerent, should be received as governor. The humble and religious Godfrey had renounced to the ambitious prelate the whole town of Jaffa, the sepulchre, the tower of David, and many other parts of Jerusalem; and the strange condition had been added, that if Godfrey should die without children, the two cities were to go unreservedly to the patriarch. The king left no issue, but his promises to the church could not affect his people, and a valiant nation felt that it was more necessary to be governed by a sword than a crosier. Tancred offered the throne to the prince of Antioch, but Bohemond about that time lost his liberty in endeavouring to extend his power into the Armenian territories. A fruitless attempt was made by the enemies of the Bouillon family, to invest the count of Tholouse with royal honours. But most of the barons and cavaliers fixed their regards upon the count of Edessa. The enterprising spirit of Baldwin eagerly aspired to a throne, and although the principality comprehended more territories than the kingdom, yet the possession of the Holy City was the highest object of ambition as well as of devotion. He shed some tears for the death of his brother, but his feelings of joy at the prospect of a

* Daimbert, bishop of Pisa, was legate of Pope Paschal the Second, the successor of Pope Urban the Second, who died fifteen days after the capture of Jerusalem, and therefore from some other cause than joy at that event. Albert of Aix charges Baldwin and Bohemond with having taken the bribes of Daimbert. The duke of Normandy had succeeded in making his friend Arnold patriarch, but, on the arrival of Daimbert, the Norman priest prudently resigned, and the Pisan prelate stepped into the vacant place. Archb. of Tyre, 771.

The Archbishop of Tyre (p. 771) is ashamed of the rapacity of Daimbert.

kingly crown soon overcame his grief. He resigned Edessa to his relation, Baldwin du Bourg, and hastened to take possession of the throne. He repelled the attacks of the emirs of Damascus and Ems, ever active when the Christians left their fortifications; but so many were the perils of the little army in its march to Jerusalem, that his good chaplain with great honesty and simplicity confesses, he had rather at that time have been at Chartres than in the Holy Land. All the barons received the brother of Godfrey with acclamations: and the patriarch, not thinking it politic to display his mortification, pretended fear, and retired to the sanctuary of Mount Sion. Baldwin, satisfied with the acknowledgments of the soldiers, disregarded the sanction of the church. But after some show of his power and abilities, friends mediated an accommodation between him and the prelate and, before all ranks of people, in the church of Bethlehem, the patriarch poured the oil of consecration on the read of Baldwin, and crowned him with the regal diadem. But Tancred, the other opponent of the new king, was not so soon appeased. He had retired from Jerusalem before the coronation, and he would not repair thither on a royal summons to do homage for some territories which he had acquired from the Muselmans. He haughtily replied, that he knew no judge of Jerusalem. A second and third summons were unanswered; but in a short time afterwards, he proposed to confer with the king near a river between Jaffa and Azotus. The remembrance of animosities in Cilicia embittered subjects of present altercation, and the agreement of the princes to delay the conclusion of the conference, prevented open outrage. The people of Antioch entreated the young Italian to administer the affairs of their country during the confinement of his relation Bohemoud. Peace without a compromise of character was in the

[ocr errors]

power of Tancred, and he therefore delivered the contested places to the sovereign, upon the condition that, in the event of his return, he might enjoy them in feudal tenure.*

His

In the reign of Baldwin, the kingdom of Jerusalem acquired strength and extent. The Muselmans of Syria trembled, and concealed their hatred of the invaders. The Fatimites, however, continually menaced the infant state. Baldwin marched his army into Egypt. But the hand of nature arrested him in the career of his fortune. The intellectual firmness of the dying man was greater than that of his friends. He endeavoured to moderate their lamentations, by recalling to their minds the perils of war and famine which they had surmounted. The place of an individual such as himself could be readily supplied, and it was their duty to think only of preserving the Holy Land. One desire which dwelt upon his mind was that they would not let his body lie in Egypt, where it would become a subject of ridicule for the Muselmans. weeping friends replied, that in the heat of the season they could scarcely touch, much less carry a corpse so great a distance; but the dying man gave them specific instructions for embalming his body, which would enable them with ease to remove it to Jerusalem. Then, recommending Baldwin du Bourg for his successor, he expired. All the soldiers mourned his death: but after the first violence of grief, the Franks assumed their ordinary appearance, lest the fatal circumstance should become known to and inspire the enemy with confidence. The army immediately left Egypt, and quickly reached the vicinity of Jerusalem. The time was the week before Easter: Baldwin du Bourg and his Edessenes were just arriving to celebrate the feast: they joined the melancholy train, and the body of the late king was taken to the sepulchre of Godfrey. The sudden loss overwhelmed the Latins with grief, and even the Saracens in Jerusalem sympathized with the common feeling. As a general in the army of the first Crusaders, and as the conqueror of Edessa, Baldwin was selfish, treacherous, and ambitious. But when he attained

* Archb. of Tyre, 776, 780. Albert, 301. 307. Fulcher, 402, 406. As for that religious scruple which Godfrey made to wear a crown of gold where Christ wore one of thorns, Baldwin easily dispensed therewith. And surely in these things the mind is all; a crown might be refused with pride, and worn with humility." the height of power, he displayed comFuller, Hist. of the Holy War, book ii. ch. 7.

* Albert, 307-8

manding virtues what he planned with ability, he generally executed with prudence; and as in the early period of his reign the number of the Christian residents in Palestine was small, and the Turks pressed him on every side, great honour must be given to a man who supported and enlarged a state which was placed on such weak foundations."

On the very day of Baldwin's funeral, the prelates and barons met in council for the choice of a successor. The prince had died without children.† The lovers of hereditary succession urged the claims of Eustace, brother of the deceased king; but that prince was in Europe, and the necessities of the country required a monarch without delay. Joscelyn de Courtenay, whose history occupies a large space in the annals of Edessa, urged the claims of Baldwin du Bourg, on the grounds of his valour and wisdom, and also his consanguinity to the late sovereigns. His opinion was espoused by the patriarch; no contradiction was offered by the other barons or prelates; Baldwin du Bourg was anointed king of Jerusalem, and repaid the services of Courtenay, by re

Fulcher, 423, 430. Gesta, 609, 614. Albert, 358, 377. Archb. of Tyre, 808, 816. It

is difficult to conceive why Tasso censures Bald
win, and praises Bohemond. Their cases were
the same.
Both deserted the Crusades from sel-
fish motives, and, for aught appears to the con-
trary, both were wise princes over Edessa and
Antioch,

Ma vede in Baldovin cupido ingegno
Ch' all' umane grandezze intento aspira:

*

E fondar Boemondo al novo regno
Sun d'Antiochia alti principi mira;
E leggi imporre, ed introdur costume,
Ed arti, e culto di verace nume.

Gerusalemme Liber., c. i. 9. Whether Baldwin had one, two, or three wives, is disputed. Fulcher, 426. Guibert, 558. Albert, 373. Malmsbury, 468. But as it is certain that he left no children, and as the conduct of his wives had no effect on politics, their history is not important to us.

Some of the lords of Palestine sent an offer of the crown to Eustace. He left France, but refused to continue his route, when he heard, in Italy, that the people had chosen Baldwin du Bourg. The brother of Godfrey generously and piously exclaimed--" God forbid that I should ever excite trouble in a country, where Jesus Christ offered up his life, in order to reconcile guilty man to heaven." L'Art de vérifier les Dates, vol. ii. p. 763.

signing to him the whole of the Edessene principality.*

Baldwin du Bourg reigned from the year 1118 to the year 1131. His portrait as a monarch may be comprised in the assertion that he imitated the piety of Godfrey, and the military conduct of Baldwin I. He pursued with constancy the politics of his predecessors, and largely added to the kingdom of Jerusalem.†

The fourth Latin king was Fulk, count of Anjou. He was one of those numerous cavaliers whom restlessness as well as religion drove from Europe into Asia. In the year 1120 he travelled to the Holy Land with a hundred men at arms. He was then in the meridian of life :§ and though his residence in the Holy Land was short, yet he left a strong impression on the court. of his virtues and accomplishments. The king of Jerusalem had no son, and he wished to ally one of his daughters to a noble French family: he fixed his eyes on Fulk; the offer was a splendid temptation, and nine years posterior to his first expedition, the gallant warrior landed in Palestine as the acknowledged heir to the throne. Not long afterwards, the king was taken ill, and finding his death approaching, he threw aside the royal robes, quitted his palace, and repaired to the * Albert, 379. Gesta, 614. Archb. of Tyre, 817.

† Ascalon was not taken till the reign of Almeric I. The conquest of that important city was the last and greatest accession of power to the kingdom of Jerusalem.

The earls of Anjou had often made journeys to Palestine. One of them many years before the first crusade went to Jerusalem, and compelling two servants by an oath to do whatever he commanded, he was publicly dragged by them, in the sight of the Turks, to the holy sepulchre. The servants scourged his naked back, while the old sinner cried aloud. "Lord receive thy wretched Fulk, thy perfidious, thy runagate; regard my repentant soul, O Lord!" Malmsbury, p. 307.

The archbishop of Tyre is certainly wrong in making Fulk's age sixty when he married Melesinda. He was not even thirty-eight: he was born in 1092. See l'Art de vérifier les Dates, article Comtes d'Anjou.

Baldwin was married to Morfia, daughter of an Armenian lord.. She bore him four daughters: Melesinda; Alice, who married Bohemond, the second prince of Antioch; Hodierna, who became the wife of Raymond, count of Tripoli; and Joie, who died an abbess.

« AnteriorContinuar »