Shakespeare's Tragic Skepticism

Capa
Yale University Press, 01/10/2008 - 304 páginas
Readers of Shakespeare’s greatest tragedies have long noted the absence of readily explainable motivations for some of Shakespeare’s greatest characters: why does Hamlet delay his revenge for so long? Why does King Lear choose to renounce his power? Why is Othello so vulnerable to Iago’s malice? But while many critics have chosen to overlook these omissions or explain them away, Millicent Bell demonstrates that they are essential elements of Shakespeare’s philosophy of doubt. Examining the major tragedies, Millicent Bell reveals the persistent strain of philosophical skepticism. Like his contemporary, Montaigne, Shakespeare repeatedly calls attention to the essential unknowability of our world.

In a period of social, political, and religious upheaval, uncertainty hovered over matters great and small—the succession of the crown, the death of loved ones from plague, the failure of a harvest. Tumultuous social conditions raised ultimate questions for Shakespeare, Bell argues, and ultimately provoked in him a skepticism which casts shadows of existential doubt over his greatest masterpieces.

No interior do livro

Opinião das pessoas - Escrever uma crítica

Shakespeare's tragic skepticism

Procura do Utilizador  - Not Available - Book Verdict

Although chiefly a specialist in American literature who has authored books on J.P. Marquand and Henry James and has edited the Library of America edition of Nathaniel Hawthorne's novels, Bell ... Ler crítica na íntegra

Páginas seleccionadas

Índice

Preface
Hamlet Othello King Lear and Macbeth
1 Hamlet Revenge
2 Othellos Jealousy
3 Unaccommodated Lear
4 Macbeths Deeds
The Roman Frame
Selected Bibliography
Direitos de autor

Outras edições - Ver tudo

Palavras e frases frequentes

Acerca do autor (2008)

Millicent Bell is professor emerita of English literature at Boston University. Her previous books include Marquand: An American Life and Meaning in Henry James.

Informação bibliográfica