Corul. Comparisons, then, must farther take place between the objects of the same sense; and, as the sight is the most lively and distract of all the senses, and the ideas it communicates make the deepest impression on the mind, the most beautiful and striking comparisons are deduced from the objects of this sense. Example and Analysis to Art. 218.) (See the Illus. 4. But though the far greater part of comparisons result from the resemblance of the qualities of sensible objects alone, yet they are sometimes instituted between the qualities of sensible and intellectual objects. Exumple. Thus, Shakspeare compares adversity to a toad, and slander to the bite of a crocodile. Scholium. In all these cases, however, the abstract or intellectual object is personified, and the comparison is founded on the supposed resemblance which the qualities of the intellectual object bear to those of the sensible object, after the former also has become a sensible object. Illus. 5. In addition to the kinds of similes already explained, there is another that frequently occurs, in which the effects only of two objects are compared. The same analogy takes place with regard to them, which was formerly observed to appear in the resemblance of the sound of words to their sense. (Art. 225.) The objects compared are not perhaps similar in their qualities, at least the merit of the figure does not depend on this circumstance, but upon the similarity of the impressions or emotions they produce in the mind. Examples. Upon this principle, the following comparisons successfully framed. 1. "Often, like the evening sun, comes the memory of former times on my soul*." 2. The music was like the memory of joys that are past, pleasant and mournful to the soult." 3. "Sorrow, like a cloud on the sun, shades the soul of Clessamourt." 4. Pleasant are the words of the song, and lovely are the tales of other times. They are like the dew of the morning on the bill of roses, when the sun is faint on its side, and the lake is settled and blue in the valet." Analysis. There is no resemblance between the evening sun and the memory of past joys, between sorrow and a cloud, or between the words of the song and the dew of the morning; but every person must perceive, that by these objects similar impressions or emotions are excited in the mind. 274. All comparisons may be reduced to the following heads. I. Those which improve our conceptions of the objects they are brought to illustrate,-- * Ossian. + Ibid. fbid. we call explaining comparisons. II. Those which augment the pleasure of imagination by a splendid assemblage of other adjacent and agreeable objects,we call embellishing comparisons. III. And, finally, those which elevate or depress the principal object, an operation often requisite in writing, but more particularly in speaking,-we call comparisons of advantage, or of disadvantage. 275. All manner of subjects admit of explaining comparisons. Let an author be reasoning ever so strictly, or treating the most abstruse point in philosophy, he may very properly intruduce a comparison, merely with a view to make his subject better understood. Example. Of this nature is the following in Harris's Hermes, employed to explain a very abstract point, the distinction between the powers of sense and imagination in the human mind. "As wax, says he, "would not be adequate to the purpose of signature, if it had not the power to retain as well as to receive the impression, the same holds of the soul with respect to sense and imagination. Sense is its receptive power; imagination its retentive. Had it sense without imagination, it would not be as wax, but as water, where though all impressions be instantly made, yet as soon as they are made they are instantly lost." Illus. In comparison of this nature, the understanding is concerned much more than the fancy: and therefore the only rules to be observed, with respect to them, are, I. That they be clear; 11. That they be useful; III. That they tend to render our conception of the principal object more distinct; and IV. That they do not lead our view aside, and bewilder it with any false light. 276. The most vigorous imagination can scarcely be supposed to have conceived more striking comparisons, or better adapted to improve our conceptions of the principal object, than the following ones of Shakspeare. Describing the effects of concealed love, he makes this happy comparison: "She never told her love, But let concealmant, like a worm in the bud, Feed on her damask cheek. She pin'd in thought, She sat, like patience on a monument, 277. Embellishing comparisons,—those with which we are chiefly concerned at present, as figures of speech-are introduced not so much with a view to inform and instruct, as to adorn the subject of which we treat; and they are those, indeed, that most frequently occur. Illus. Resemblance is the foundation of this figure. We must not however, take resemblance, in too strict a sense, for actual similitude and likeness of appearance. Two objects may sometimes be very happily compared to one another, though they resemble each other, strictly speaking, in nothing; only, because they agree in the effects which they produce upon the mind; because they raise a train of similar, or, what may be called, concordant ideas; so that the remembrance of the one, when recalled, serves to strengthen the impression made by the other. (Illus. 5. Art. 273.) Example 1. To describe the nature of soft and melancholy music, Ossian says, "The music of Carryl was, like the memory of joys that are past, pleasant and mournful to the soul." Analysis. This is happy and delicate. Yet surely, no kind of music has any resemblance to a feeling of the mind, such as the memory of past joys. Had it been compared to the voice of the nightingale, or the murmur of the stream, as it would have heen by some ordinary poet, the likeness would have been more strict; but, by founding his simile upon the effect which Carryl's music produced, Ossian, while he conveys a very tender image, gives us, at the same time, a much stronger impression of the nature and strain of that music: "Like the memory of joys that are past, pleasant and mournful to the soul." Example 2. Homer introduces a most charming night-scene, while his main object is only to illustrate the state of the Grecian camp after a battle. "The troops, exulting, sat in order round, * Twelfth Night, Act II. Sc. 4. The conscious swains, rejoicing in the night, Eye the blue vault, and bless the useful light. So many flames before proud Ilion blaze, And lighten glimmering Xanthus with their rays! Analysis. This simile needs no comment to display its beauties. Not only is the primary object, the Grecian fires, elucidated by the splendid resemblance of the glowing stars, but the imagination is farther captivated by a delightful collection of connected objects, which together concur to form an extensive and interesting picture. Scho. Such comparisons not only supply the most striking illustrations of the objects they are brought to illuminate, but embellish also the general prospect by occasional openings into beautiful adjacent fields. They operate like episodes in a long work, which relax and regale the mind, without distracting it from its capital persuit. They produce an effect similar to what happens to the traveller, from surveying in his course unexpected and surprising scenes of nature or of art. He turns aside a moment to contemplate them, and then resumes his journey with redoubled ardour and delight. 278. The third sort of comparisons are employed to elevate or depress the principal object. Example 1. The following example must aggrandize our conceptions of the valour of Hector, howsoever great we can suppose it to have been in reality, "Girt in surrounding flames, he seems to fall Like fire from Jove, and bursts upon them all; So pale the Greeks the eyes of Hector meet, Example. 2. The following quotation will explain the manner in which comparisons operate to depress the primary object. Milton has employed a most expressive and successful figure to vilify the courage and resistance of the fallen angels: "Gabriel - as a herd Of goats, or tim'rous flock, together thronged, Example 3. Shakspeare could not have devised a more effectual method of exposing the character of a fop, than by contrasting him with his most valorous hero, Hotspur. The passage supplies a pertinent illustration of the nature of contrasts, and of their powers to diminish or depress. Hotspur thus addresses the king about the prisoners whom he had taken, and whom he had been accused of refusing to surrender. My Liege, I did deny no prisoners; And 'twixt his finger and his thumb he held He gave his nose. And still he smil'd and talk'd; He call'd them untaught slaves, unmannerly, With many holiday and lady terms He question'd me. Among the rest demanded Out of my grief and my impatience, Ile should, or he should not; for it made me mad, Of guns, and drums, and wounds. And telling me, the sovereigu'st thing on earth That this villainous salt-petre hould be digg'd He would himself have been a soldier." Obs. Having explained the nature of comparisons, and illustrated the purposes which they are calculated to serve, to guard the student against errors, we shall enumerate the capital mistakes committed in the use of these figures; and then conclude the chapter by some remarks on the propriety of the occasions in which they may be introduced. 279. Comparison should not be instituted between objects, the resemblance of which is either obscure, faint, or remote. Example. The following simile was intended by Milton to illus |