Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub

Enterpise Ins. Co., Black v... .......223 Hord, Pros. Atty, ex rel., &c., v. Etchison Ditching Ass'n v. Jarrell.131 Elliott et al...

....220 Evansville, City of, Walker V.......393 Iunter, Adm'r, The Bellefontaine

R. W. Co. V........

....335 F Hunter, Smith V............

.106 Ilyatt v. Hyatt........

..309 Falley et al. Draper v............ ..465 Hyatt, McCormick v...

546 Farneman, Treas., Priest v...........397 Hydraulic Woollen Mills Co., The Ferguson v. Stafford et al............ 162 City of Columbus v .........

.........433 Feriter v. The State............... 283 First Nat'l Bank, &c., v. The Indi

I anapolis Piano Manf'g Co.........302 Flannagar, Ramsey V............ 305

Indianapolis, City of, v. Patterson et Foltz v. The State......

215
al...........

..........157 Frieze, The Town of Martinsville v.507

Indianapolis Piano Manuf'g Co. v. Frink v. Bellis et al..........

135
First Nat'l Bank........

..302 G

J Gaff et al. v. Theis.......

.307 Gandolpho v. The State..... 439 Jamison, Ross V.......

....122 Garnier v. Gebhard et al.............225 Jaqua v. Montgomery Ghon, The Jeff. Mad. & Ind'polis Jarrell, The Etchison Ditch'g Co. v.131 R. R. Co. 5......

.123 Jeff. Mad. & Ind'polis R. R. Co. v. Gibson, Kingan et al. V......... 53 Ghon.....

..123 Gillig, The Town of Martinsville v.510 Jenkins, Pattison et al. V........... 87 Gilmore, Barnett v........ .199 Johns v. Sewell.......

1 Goings v. White..... ........ 125 Johnson, Dunn et al. v ......... 54 Green, Scott et al. v ..... ...192 Johnson's Admr's v. Hedrick et al.129

Johnson et al. v. Cookerly...........151 H

Jordan Ditching & Draining Ass'n v. Wagoner....

50 Hamilton, The State, ex rel. Bill

..502

K
Hammond, The Toledo, &c., R. W.
Co. V.....

..379

Keicher v. The Killbuck Turnpike Hanselman, Kissinger V.............. 80

Co.......... Harbeck, Waddle, V....................231 Kent et al., Musselman V............. 452

.........333 Harding, Mousler et ux. V............176 Killbuck Turnpike Co., Keicher v..333 Hardwick, Adm'r, v. The Danville,

Kimball, Bingham v...

18+ &c., Gr. Road Co. et al............321

Kingan et al. v. Gibson...... 53 Hardy v. Donellan........ ........501

Kirk, Baker, Gov. V......... ....517 Harrison, &c., Turnpike Co. et al.

Kirkpatrick v. Snyder et al.........169 v. Roberts..

.246

Kissinger v. Hanselman........ 80 Haun v. The Mulberry, &c., Gr.

Kistner v. Sindlinger...................114 Road Co..........

...103 Haynes, White v...

Knowles, Dryden v....................148 .......540

Kruger, Smith v ................
Heagy et al, v. Cheesman, Adm’r.. 96
Hedrick et al., Johnson's Adm’rs v.129
Heeg et al. v. Weigand et al........ 289

L
IIenning, The State v..

...189 IIereth et al. v. Love...... .516 Lafayette, City of, Romig v......... 30 Hereth et al. v. Meyer ...... .511 Lamb, Treas. v. Rawles, Ex'r ......336 Iereth et al, v. Smith..... .514 Laporte, City of, et al. Nelson v... 258 Herod, Day T.........

.197 Law et al. v. Manville, Treas.......111 Hison et al. v. Cuppy

.210 | Leobold v. The State... .........484 Hoffa v. IIofiman..

.....172 Leonard et al. v. Shirts...... ....214 Honey Creek Draining Co., Thomp Love, Hereth et al. v....... .......316

268 | Lumley, Weston V........ ...486

man, v...

......... 86

son V.....

[ocr errors]

na V.....

.143

M

R Mace et al., Ellsworth et al. v...... 73 Ragsdale, Treas., Whitney et al. v.107 Mandlove v. Pavy..................

Ramsey v. Flannagan.............

.305 .505

Rapp, Schneider v....... ......... 270 Manville, Treas., Law et al. v......111 Manville, Treas. Strader et al. v...111 Rawles, Ex’r, Lamb, Treas., v......386

Reed, The Bellefontaine R.W. Co.v.476 Martinsville, Town of, v. Frieze....507 Martinsville, Town of, v. Gillig....510 Reeves et al., Plough v...............181

Reed, Biddle v..

..529 Mayer v. The State....

203 McAllister, Watts V....................264

Reitz v. The State, ex. rel. Holden.187 McCormick v. Hyatt.....

Roberts, The Harrison, &c., Turn

....546 McEwen et al. v. The Jeff., Mad.,

pike Co. et al. v....... ..........246 Robinson v. Jamison....

.122 & Ind'polis R. R. Co.......... ...368

Robinson v. Murphy.... ...... ..482 McGowen et al., Sullivan v.........139

Rogers v. The State.....

..543 McKinley, The Terre Haute & Indianapolis R. R. Co. v...........274 Romig v. The City of Lafayette... 30

Rose v. The State.......

.167 Meyer, Hereth et al. v.. ...511

.120 Miller's. The Toledo, &c., R. W.C0.535 Ross et al. v. Crews et al............

Rupp v. Stith...........

.244 Monroe, Treas., v. Strader et al......111 Monrovia, &c., Gr. Road Co. et al.

S
Swindler et al. v................... 160
Montgomery, Jaqua v...
30 Schneider v. Rapp.......

..270 Morea, Cook v. ...... ..497 Scott et al. v. Green....

..192 Morgan et al. v. Woods.... 23 Sewell, Johns V......

1 Mousler et ux. v. Harding............176 Seyberger v. The Calumet DrainMulberry, &c., Gr. Road Co., Han- ing Co...........

.......330 „,103 Shannon v. Baker, Gov......... .390 Murphy, Robinson v...

482 Shaw v. Spencer et al........ Musselman v. Kent et al..... ........452 Shirts, Leonard et al. v ...............214 Musselman v. The State..............267 Sindlinger, Kistner v..... ..........114 Myrick v. The Board of Comm. Slaughter, The Brooklyn Gr. Road Montgomery Co......... .383

Co. v...

.185 Smith, Hereth et al. v .............. .514 N

Smith v. Hunter....
Smith v. Kruger..

80 Nash, Aud., v. The State, ex rel. Smith v, The State...

.159 Black et al.........

78 Snyder et al., Kirkpatrick v..... Nave v. Wilson, Adm'r.. .294 Solomon, The State V..........

...450 Nelson v. The City of Laporte et al.258 Spencer et al., Shaw v...............143 New Haven, &c., Turnpike Co. et Stafford et al., Ferguson V........... 162 al. v. Bird.....

.325 State, ex rel. Barnes, Achcy v...... 82

State, ex rel. Billman, v. Ilamilton.502
State, ex rel. Black et al., Nash,
Aud., V......

78 Page v. Thompson...

137 State, ex rel. Dennison, Bagot et Palmer, Bowser ct al. v...... ..124

al. V......

..262 Parker et al, 'The State, ex rel. State, ex rel. Farnham, v. Willis Middle Tp. V..... .285 et al.......

..118 Patterson et al., The City of Indi- State, ex rel. Holden, Reitz v.......

...187 anapolis V........

..157 State, ex rel. Lawrence, v. White Pattison v. Culton et al...... .......240 et al........

.......293 Pattison et al. v. Jenkins......... 87 State, ex rel. Lingenfelter v. The Pavy, Mandlove V....

505 Danville, &c., Gr. Road Co......133 Plough v. Reeves et al.......... 181 State, ex rel. Middle Tp. v. Parker Plough v. Williams et al....... 182 et al.....

...285 Poole, Wilson V.....

443 State, ex rel. Milhorn, Stone V......538 Porter v. Dearinger.... ....................155 State, Clackner V.........

.412 Pottmeyer, The State v ...............

...402 State, Clem V............... .418 Priest 5. Farneman, Treas...........397 | State v. Clottu......

..403

.... 106

.160

............

P

State, Crawford v........

.304 | Town of Martinsville v. Frieze.....507 State, Crocket v........

416 Town of Martinsville v. Gillig ......510 State, Eitel V..............

.201 Turner et al. v. The Thorntown, State, Feriter V.............

283 &c., Gr. Road Co. et al.............317 State, Foltz V............. .......215 Turnpaugh et ux., Yount V.......... 46 State, Gandolpho V........ ..439 State v. Henning......

...189

V State, Leobold v .........

484 State, Mayer v...

203 Vierling, Blair et al. v................269 State, Musselman v. .267 Vierling, The State V..........

99 State v. Pottmeyer.. .402 Vierling v. The State....

..218 State, Rogers V..........

.543 State, Rose V............

W

.167 State, Smith V........

159
Waddle v. Harbeck...

..231 State v. Solomon....

...450

Waggoner, Adams V............ .531 State v. Vierling..

99

Waggoner et ux., Crane V.......... 83 State, Vierling V.........

.218

Wagoner, The Jordan Ditching, State, Watts V......

.237
&c., Ass'n v.......

..... 50 State, Weis V.........

204
Walker v.

The City of Evansville.393 State, Wiles V.........

206

Wamsley, Day V.................. .145 Stith, Rupp v..........

.244

Watts v. McAllister.......... 264 Stone v. The State, ex rel. Milhorn.538

Watts v. The State.....................237 Storey et al., City of Columbus et

Weigand et al., Heeg et al. ........289 al. V..

..195
Weis v. The State................

.204 Strader et al. v. Manville, Treas...111

Weston v. Lumley

486 Strader et al., Monroe, Treas. V.....11)

White, Goings V.................... ..125 Stroud et al. v. Whitman, Recei

White v. Haynes....... ver, &C.........

..........540 71

White et al., The State, ex rel. Sullivan v. McGowen et al..........139

Lawrence, V......... ........ 298 Swindler et al. v. The Monrovia, &c., Gr. Road Co. et al...........160 Whitman, Receiver

, &c., Briggs V... 72 Whitman, Receiver, &c., Boland v. 64

Whitman, Receiver, &c., Stroud et T

al. V...... Terre Haute & Ind'polis R. R. Co.

Whitney et al. v. Ragsdale, Treas.107
Wiles v. The State.....

206 v. McKinley..........

.....274 Theis, Gaff et al. V....................307 Willis et al., The State, ex rel.

Williams et al., Plough v............182 Thompson v. Eagleton................300

Farnham, V........ Thompson, Page v....

.....137

Wilson, Adm'r, Nave V............... 294 Thompson v. The Honcy Creek

Wilson v. Poole.......

....443 Draining Co......... .268

...127 Thorntown, &c., Gr. Road Co. et al.,

Wire, Ellis V.................

Wolcott, Case V...........
Turner et al. v...

...317
Woods, Morgan et al. v....

23 Toledo, Wabash, &c., R. W. Co. v. Hammond...

379 Toledo, Wabash, &c., R. W. Co., Miller y......

....535/ Yount s. Turnpaugh et ux........... 46

..............118

TABLE OF THE CASES CITED

IN THIS VOLUME.

A

| Bunnel v. Witherow, 29 Ind. 123..547 Abdil v. Abdil, 26 Ind. 287....114, 161

Butler v. Skomp, 3 Blackf. 392.....198 Albaugh v. James, 29 Ind. 398.....180

Butterfield v. Forrester, 11 East. Alexander v. Frary, 9 Ind. 481.....314 Butterfield v. The Western R. R.

60........

356 Allen v. Williams, 12 Pick. 297...378 Ammerman v. Crosby, 26 Ind. 451.303

Co., 10 Allen, 532...........363, 367 Anderson v. The State, 28 Ind. 22

421, 425 Armstrong v. Cook, 30 Ind. 22.....291 Arnold v. Sturges, 5 Blackf. 256...489 Campbell v. Quinlin, 3 Scam. 228..199

Carnie v. Murphy, 28 Ind. 88.......179 B

Carpenter v. Snelling, 97 Mass. 452.106

Chicago and Alton R. R. Co. v. Baker v. Wheeler, 8 Wend. 505....129 Gretzner, 46 Ill. 74...............360 Bales v. Scott, 26 Ind. 202...........301 Chicago & Mississippi R. R. Co. v. Bank of Rochester v. Jones, 4 N. Patchin, 16 Ill. 198...............362 Y. 497.........

..........378 City of New Albany v. Cook, 29 Barker v. Havens, 17 Johns, 234..375 Ind., 220........

32 Barnes v. Modisett, 3 Blackf. 253..198 City of Portland v. Stock, 2 OreBarnes v. The State, 28 Ind. 82..... 238

gon, 69..........

.........474 Barnum v.Vandusen, 16 Conn. 200.500 Clark v. Baird, 9 N. Y. 183..........165 Bates v. The State, 31 Ind. 72......403 Clark v. Bond, 29 Ind. 555...427, 429 Baxter v. The Troy, &c., R. R. Co. Clem v. The State, 33 Ind. 418.....202 41 N. Y, 502........

.363 Cliff v. The Midland R. W. Co., L. Beisiegel v. The N. Y. Cent. R. R. R. 5 Q. B. 258....

...364 Co., 40 N. Y. 9............. ....362 Cochnower v. Cochnower, 27 Ind. Bell v. Hansley, 3 Jones N. C. 131.534 253....

114 Bennett v. Welch, 15 Ind. 332......313 Colden v. Eldred, 15 Johns. 220...498 Betts v. Lee, 5 Johns. 348............129 Collins v. Boston & Maine R. R. Blewett v. Tregonning, 3 A. & E. Co., 10 Cush. 506..................382 554........

406 Collins-v. Nave, 9 Ind. 209...........456 Board of Comm. Miami Co. v. Collins v. The Union Transporta

Bearss, 25 Ind. 110................399 tion Co., 10 Watts, 384............374 Board of Supervisors v. Davenport, Colt v. Eves, 12 Conn. 243...........199 40 Ill. 197.....

.111 Combs v. The State, 26 Ind. 98.202,421 Boulter and Clark, Buller's N. P. Commonwealth v. Ingraham, 7 16

..533 Gray, 46...................414, 428 Bowen v. Mulford, 5 Halst. 230..... 28 Commonwealth v. Knox, 6 Mass. Brace v. Yale, 10 Allen, 441........404

76.......

..417 Bradley v. The Bank, 20 Ind. 528.445 Cone v. Baldwin, 12 Pick. 545......513 Brady v. Ball, 14 Ind. 317..........498 Conner v. Conner, 29 Ind. 48..312; 315 Brown v. Bowen, 30 N. Y. 519.....405 Cooper v. Williams, 4 Ohio, 253...405 Brown v. Modisett, 3 Blackf. 381...198 Copp v. Sawyer, 6 N. H. 386........ 44 Brown v. Mooers, 6 Gray, 451......428 Corneille v. The State, 16 Ind. 232.169 Brown v. Sax, 8 Cow. 95............129 Costigan v. The Mohawk, &c., R. Brumfield v. Palmer, 7 Blackf. 227. 4 R. Co. 2 Denio, 609...... Buckingham v. Smith, 10 Ohio, 288.405 Cox v. O'Riley, 4 Ind. 368...........531

............ 63

[ocr errors]

Coxe v. Harden, 4 East, 211.........242

G Crane v. Buchanan, 29 Ind. 570...180 Crane v. Waggoner, 27 Ind. 52..... 84 Gaines v. Walker, 16 Ind. 36L..... 456 Crisman v. Masters 23 Ind. 319.....498 Galena, &c., R. Ř. Co. v. Dill, 23 Cummings v. Barrett, 10 Cush. 186.408 Ill. 264......

..............362 Cummings v. Butler, 3 Blackf. 190.491 Galena, &c., R. R. Co. v. Loomis, Cunningham v. Dorsey, 6 Cal. 19... 62 13 Ill. 548...

..362 Cuppy v. Hixon, 29 Ind. 522........21.3 Galloway v. The State, 29 Ind. 442.188

Garrison v. Clark, 11 Ind. 369......516 D

Gatling v. Newell, 9 Ind. 572.......155 Daniel v. Mitchell, i Story, 172....153 Gentile v. The State, 29 Ind. 409...422 Dascomb v. The Buffalo, &c., R. R.

Glascock v. Lyons, 20 Ind. 1........391 Co., 27 Barb. 221..

........359, 367

Goddard v. Lyman, 14 Pick. 268...512 Day v. Herod, 33 Ind. 197..........201 Goodman v. Pocock, 15 Q. B. 576.. 21 Dean v. Phillips, 17 Ind. 406........501 Gould v. Boston Duck Co., 13 Dequindre v.Williams, 31 Ind. 444.222 Gray, 442.......

..405 Dickey v. Tennison, 27 Mo. 373.... 81 Governor v. Nelson, 6 Ind. 496.....528 Dole v. Erskine, 35 N. H. 503..533, 531 Great Northern R. W. Co. v. ShepDormer v. The State, 2 Ind. 308...304

herd, 9 Eng. L. & E. 477.........382 Downing v. Marshall, 37 N. Y. 380.401 Gregory v. Perdue, 29 Ind. 66...... 94 Dows v. Greene, 32 Barb. 490......242 Greencastle, &c., Turnpike Co. v. Doyle v. Kiser, 6 Ind. 242............382 The State, ex rel. Malot, 28 Ind. Draper v. Falley, 33 Ind. 465........509

382.....

........142, 469 Drapert v. The State, 14 Ind. 123..100 Greening v. Wilkinson, 1 C. & P. Duck v. Abbott, 24 Ind. 349.........138

625.....

......129 Dufour v. Dufour, 28 Ind. 421......130 Greyes Case, Owen, 20...............403

Grignon's Lessee v. Astor, 2 How. 319....

.495 Earl v. Dresser, 30 Ind. 11...........301

Gwinn v. Hubbard, 3 Blackf. 14..,504 Edgerton v. Huff, 26 Ind. 35........408 Eitel v. The State, 33 Ind. 201.... 204,

205, 207 Hadjo v. Gooden, 13 Ala, 718.......428 Elder v. Smith, 16 Ind. 466.........516 Hamilton v. McPherson, 28 N. Y. 72. 63 Elliott v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 10 Hanford v. Obrecht, 49 Ill. 146.....106 Cush. 191.....

....404 Ilanna v. Commissioners, &c., 29 Ellsworth v. Pomeroy, 26 Ind. 158. 76 Ind. 170........ Emans v. Turnbull, 2 Johns. 313...406 IIarper v. Miller, 27 Ind. 277........457 Ernst v. Hudson River R. R. Co., 39 Harper v. Pound, 10 Ind. 32........530 N. Y. 61......

..360 Harrison v. Warren, 1 Blackf. 385.401 Evans v. Merriweather, 3 Scam. Hasselback v. Sinton, 17 Ind. 545.488 492......

.....405 Havens v. The Eric R. W. Co., 41 Evansville, &c., R. R. Co. v. Fitz- N. Y. 296........

.........362 patrick, 10 Ind. 120...............165 Heaton v. Angier, 7 N. II. 397......175 Ewart v. Kerr, 2 McMullan, 141...127 Ileavilon v. Ileavilon, 29 Ind. 509.138 Ex parte Watkins, 3 Pet. 193.......495 Henry v. Hamilton, 7 Blackf. 506..496

Henry v. Ritenour, 31 Ind. 136.....156 F

Herf. v. Shulze, 10 Ohio, 263........ 29 Fahnestock v. The State, 23 Ind.

Hill v. Buckminster, 5 Pick. 391... 44 231..

Holland v. Fuller, 13 Ind. 195......117

426 Feaster v. Woodfill, 23 Ind. 493....238 Hollingsworth v. Barbour, 4 Pet.

466..

28 Fisher v. Bridges, 4 Blackf. 518....533 Hopkins v. Lee, 6 Wheat. 109...... 23 Fisher v. Ewing, 30 Ind. 130........303 Howell v. Wilson, 2 Blackf. 418... 44 Fisher v. Johnson, 5 Ind. 492..... Flagg v. The Inhabitants of Mill

I bury, 4 Cush. 243..................418 Flournoy v. The City of Jefferson- Illinois Cen. R. R. Co. v. Phelps, ville, 17 Ind. 169........ ......234 29 Ill. 447......

.....362 Fox v. Harding, 7 Cush. 516 ......... 62 Indiana & Ill. R. R. Co. v. WilFrank v. Peters, 9 Ind. 343..........117 liams, 22 Ind. 198...............94, 436

[ocr errors]

.......161

.....

4

« AnteriorContinuar »