In Defense of the Bush DoctrineUniversity Press of Kentucky, 11/05/2007 - 264 páginas The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, shattered the prevalent optimism in the United States that had blossomed during the tranquil and prosperous 1990s, when democracy seemed triumphant and catastrophic wars were a relic of the past. President George W. Bush responded with a bold and controversial grand strategy for waging a preemptive Global War on Terror, which has ignited passionate debate about the purposes of American power and the nation's proper role in the world. In Defense of the Bush Doctrine offers a vigorous argument for the principles of moral democratic realism that inspired the Bush administration's policy of regime change in Iraq. The Bush Doctrine rests on two main pillars—the inadequacy of deterrence and containment strategies when dealing with terrorists and rogue regimes, and the culture of tyranny in the Middle East, which spawns aggressive secular and religious despotisms. Two key premises shape Kaufman's case for the Bush Doctrine's conformity with moral democratic realism. The first is the fundamental purpose of American foreign policy since its inception: to ensure the integrity and vitality of a free society "founded upon the dignity and worth of the individual." The second premise is that the cardinal virtue of prudence (the right reason about things to be done) must be the standard for determining the best practicable American grand strategy. In Defense of the Bush Doctrine provides a broader historical context for the post–September 11 American foreign policy that will transform world politics well into the future. Kaufman connects the Bush Doctrine and current issues in American foreign policy, such as how the U.S. should deal with China, to the deeper tradition of American diplomacy. Drawing from positive lessons as well as cautionary tales from the past, Kaufman concludes that moral democratic realism offers the most compelling framework for American grand strategy, as it expands the democratic zone of peace and minimizes the number and gravity of threats the United States faces in the modern world. |
No interior do livro
Resultados 1-5 de 29
... fighting Germany because under its present government, a government of ruthless and despotic militarism, Germany has become the arch foe of international right and of ordered freedom throughout the world.”24 Though his countrymen ...
... fighting Hitler and tojo,” because he does not believe the united States was threatened by Japan's bid for empire in ... fight the united States when nazi Germany had the enormous resources of eurasia at its disposal, and when the united ...
... fight one another. So they oppose any american foreign policy that identifies regime type as the root cause of aggression or that places great emphasis on the need to defend and expand stable, liberal democracy. This includes franklin ...
... fight one another: more important was the existence of a common friend. The presence of u.S. forces enabled Germany to keep forces at a lower level than its strategic position would have warranted: without them, Germany would have ...
... fight one another and make better allies than other types of regimes. They were right.26 The truman administration and its most far-sighted successors prudently recognized what still eludes neorealists and most classical realists: our ...
Índice
1 | |
5 | |
23 | |
51 | |
4 The Perils of Liberal Multilateralism | 63 |
5 Moral Democratic Realism | 87 |
6 Moral Democratic Realism and the Endgame of the Cold War | 101 |
7 The Bush Doctrine and Iraq | 125 |
Beyond the War on Terror | 143 |
Epilogue | 153 |
Appendix | 157 |
Notes | 185 |
Bibliography | 217 |
Index | 241 |