In Defense of the Bush DoctrineUniversity Press of Kentucky, 11/05/2007 - 264 páginas The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, shattered the prevalent optimism in the United States that had blossomed during the tranquil and prosperous 1990s, when democracy seemed triumphant and catastrophic wars were a relic of the past. President George W. Bush responded with a bold and controversial grand strategy for waging a preemptive Global War on Terror, which has ignited passionate debate about the purposes of American power and the nation's proper role in the world. In Defense of the Bush Doctrine offers a vigorous argument for the principles of moral democratic realism that inspired the Bush administration's policy of regime change in Iraq. The Bush Doctrine rests on two main pillars—the inadequacy of deterrence and containment strategies when dealing with terrorists and rogue regimes, and the culture of tyranny in the Middle East, which spawns aggressive secular and religious despotisms. Two key premises shape Kaufman's case for the Bush Doctrine's conformity with moral democratic realism. The first is the fundamental purpose of American foreign policy since its inception: to ensure the integrity and vitality of a free society "founded upon the dignity and worth of the individual." The second premise is that the cardinal virtue of prudence (the right reason about things to be done) must be the standard for determining the best practicable American grand strategy. In Defense of the Bush Doctrine provides a broader historical context for the post–September 11 American foreign policy that will transform world politics well into the future. Kaufman connects the Bush Doctrine and current issues in American foreign policy, such as how the U.S. should deal with China, to the deeper tradition of American diplomacy. Drawing from positive lessons as well as cautionary tales from the past, Kaufman concludes that moral democratic realism offers the most compelling framework for American grand strategy, as it expands the democratic zone of peace and minimizes the number and gravity of threats the United States faces in the modern world. |
No interior do livro
Resultados 1-5 de 35
... greater danger than Stalin. Limited collaboration with the Soviet union was, therefore, prudent under the terrible circumstances to avert the greater moral and geopolitical evil of a total nazi victory. fDR's sound instincts as a ...
... greater scientific precision by giving primacy to what they call the structure of the international system. This structure ultimately defines how states behave, including the united States. By international system neorealists mean the ...
... greater vigilance and dedication to the spread of democracy could have averted. In an excellent critique of neorealist opposition to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Georgetown university political scientist Robert Lieber notes the “mixed ...
... greater scale.19 Indeed, the dominant theme of The Gathering Storm, the first volume of Churchill's magisterial history of the Second World War, starkly contradicts neorealism's counsel that democracies assess threats without regard to ...
... greater evil of a total nazi victory. The mistake lay in fDR's thinking that the united States could or should perpetuate that arrangement. Prudence justifies choosing the lesser moral and geopolitical evil to prevent the greater one ...
Índice
1 | |
5 | |
23 | |
51 | |
4 The Perils of Liberal Multilateralism | 63 |
5 Moral Democratic Realism | 87 |
6 Moral Democratic Realism and the Endgame of the Cold War | 101 |
7 The Bush Doctrine and Iraq | 125 |
Beyond the War on Terror | 143 |
Epilogue | 153 |
Appendix | 157 |
Notes | 185 |
Bibliography | 217 |
Index | 241 |