Alaskan Oil Deliverability: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Power of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, Ninety-fifth Congress, First Session ... August 10, 1977U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978 - 322 páginas |
Outras edições - Ver tudo
Palavras e frases frequentes
abandonment additional Administration agencies air pollution air quality Air Resources Board Alaskan crude Alaskan oil alternative AOPC application approved authority BARRETT Basin BATINOVICH berths Chairman Clean Air Act Coast Guard Company CONGRESS THE LIBRARY construction cost COSTLE crude oil decision delivery DINGELL discuss El Paso Elk Hills emissions environmental impact estimates facilities Federal Energy Administration Federal permits filed GARIBALDI going Gulf Coast hydrocarbon issue Kitimat KITZMILLER legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRES LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Long Beach MB/D Midwest million barrels mmcf/d natural gas North Slope crude Northern Tier Pipeline O'LEARY oil pipeline Paso Paso's percent pipeline capacity pipeline system Port Hueneme Port of Long problem proposed question QUINN refineries refiners regulations Robinson route ships shortfall Sohio project sources standards statement subcommittee surplus tank farm tanker tanker operations terminal tion tradeoff transportation Valdez vessels VLCEK West Coast
Passagens conhecidas
Página 104 - Congress may touch a field in which the federal interest is so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on the same subject.
Página 105 - SEC. 510. Except as expressly provided in this Act, nothing in this Act shall (1) preclude or deny the right of any State or political subdivision thereof or interstate agency...
Página 103 - Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 US 218, 230, 67 S.Ct. 1146, 1152,91 L.Ed. 1447: "Congress legislated here in a field which the States have traditionally occupied. ... So we start with the assumption that the historic police powers of the States were not to be superseded by the Federal Act unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.
Página 104 - where compliance with both federal and state regulations is a physical impossibility..., " Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul, 373 US 132, 142-143 (1963), or where the state " law stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress.
Página 93 - ... the prevention and control of air pollution at its source is the primary responsibility of States and local governments; and (4) that Federal financial assistance and leadership is essential for the development of cooperative Federal, State, regional, and local programs to prevent and control air pollution.
Página 104 - Congressional enactments that do not exclude all state legislation in the same field nevertheless override state laws with which they conflict. US Const, Art. VI. The criterion for determining whether state and federal laws are so inconsistent that the state law must give way is firmly established in our decisions. Our task is "to determine whether, under the circumstances of this particular case, [the state's] law stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and...
Página 112 - ... incidental, it will be upheld unless the burden imposed on such commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits. If a legitimate local purpose is found, then the question becomes one of degree. And the extent of the burden that will be tolerated will of course depend on the nature of the local interest involved, and on whether it could be promoted as well with a lesser impact on interstate activities.
Página 111 - US 218, 230 (1947)), and conflict pre-emption, where "compliance with both federal and state regulations is a physical impossibility," Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul, 373 US 132, 142-143 (1963), or where state law "stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress.
Página 108 - In order to prevent damage to, or the destruction or loss of any vessel, bridge, or other structure on or in the navigable waters of the United States, or any land structure or shore area immediately adjacent to those waters; and to protect the navigable waters and the resources therein from environmental harm resulting from vessel or structure damage, destruction, or loss...
Página 12 - The People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Circle Pines, Minnesota, City of Coastal Farms, Inc.