...113; Davies Warehouse Co. v. Bowles, 321 US 144, 148-149. So we start with the assumption that the historic police powers of the States were not to be...unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress. Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 272 US 605, 611 ; Allen-Bradley Local v. Wisconsin...

...113 ; Davies Warehouse Co. v. Bowles, 321 US 144, 148-149. So we start with the assumption that the historic police powers of the States were not to be...unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress." In Reid v. Colorado (187 US 137), the Supreme Court of the United States said (page 148)...

...Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator, which requires that "the historic police powers of the States . . . not ... be superseded by the Federal Act unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress." 20 Measured by that test, the Georgia law here cannot be invalidated. commerce, he said:...

...in a field which the States have traditionally occupied.... So we Etart with the assumption that the historic police " ''powers of the States were not...unless that was the clear and .manifest purpose of Congress. Burb.inl; v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc. , 411 US 624, 633 (1973). —Only when there are...

...In a field which the States have traditionally occupied.... So we start with the assumption that the historic police ~ 'powers of the States were not to...superseded by the Federal Act unless that was the clear and •nanifcst purpose of Congress. Burbnnk v. Lockheed Air Terminal, Inc. . 411 US 624, 633 (1973). -Only...

...a field which the States have traditionally occupied. ... So we start with the assumption that the historic police powers of the States were not to be...unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress. . . . Such a purpose may be evidenced In several ways. [1] The scheme of federal regulation...

...state laws on the subject. The Supreme Court has stated that "we start with the assumption that the historic police powers of the States were not to be...unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress." Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 US 218, 230 (1947) : Jones v. Rath Packing Co., 430...

...legislation has, by implication, foreclosed remedial local enactments 'we start with the assumption that the historic police powers of the States were not to be...unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress' (citation omitted]. This assumption derives from our basic constitutional division of legislative...

...legislation has, by implication, foreclosed remedial local enactments 'we start with the assumption that the historic police powers of the States were not to be...unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress1 [citation omitted]. This assumption derives from our basic constitutional division of legislative...

..."(w]e start with the assunption that the historic polios powers of the States were not to be sjperseded by the Federal Act unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress." Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 US 218, 230, 67 S.Ct. 1146, 1152, 91 L.Ed. 1447 (1947)....