« AnteriorContinuar »
The apostles belief in their Lord's" resurrection, and in
the subsequent manifestations of his divine power, was not imputable to enthusiasm. **
IF during the life time of their Lord the apostles received fuch evidence of his. divine authority as no enthusiasm could supply, fuch evidence as approves itself to our reason, and abundantly accounts for their ready obedience to their Master's call, and their adherence to his person, even unto death, much more did they receive clear and undeniable proofs of his resurrection from the dead... 1.....; ....!;!; ;. ir pei li,.;.. Gert
If indeed we contemplate their situation and cons duct at this important crisis, it will appear, that enthusiasm mnst have been wholly excluded from their minds. Suppose for a moment, that by some unaccountable means, they had been worked up into an enthusiastic belief of miracles they had never seen, and of divine perfections, which existed only in their fond imaginations, how utterly impossible that such a delusion should have survived their crucified Lord. They had, as they'confess, followed him as a tem
1 Matt. xvi. 21. to the end. Mark ix. 33---37. Matt. XX. to xxviii. compare Mark X. 35--45. Luke xxiv. 31.
poral Messiah, who would prové by miracles his claim to the throne of David, who would be received by the assembled thousands of Israel, rescue them from the Roman yoke, and subjugate to their power the remotest nations of the earth. But the event exhibited the total reverse of this ; their. Mafter seized, bound, accused, declaring “ his kingdom was not of this world," and submitting, without reply or resistance, to insult and outrage ; they faw him perfecuted by the priests and rulers ; they heard the populace clamour for his condemnation, 'till the Roman governor pronounced his ignominious doom ; and they beheld him expire on the cross, dying the death of the accursed, and lodged in the depths of the grave. Every fond hope seemed to be thus for éver blasted, every ambitious thought was crushed, every prejudice of their religion, their education, outraged.
Alas! what delusion could have withstood fuch'a Thock as this? what credulity could have longer blinded? what enthufiafm could have longer pofseffed them? how difappointed, how dejected, how alarm
Even after his resurrection, they resumed for some time the same ideas of his kingdom, as appears from their question to him, Acts i. 6. “ Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the “ kingdom to Ifrael ?” So ill prepared were they for the fpiritual and enlarged scheme of the gospel, till enlightened and directed by the miraculous effufion of the holy Spirit.
ed, ed, must the coolest and the steadiest minds have been at such a scene ? and much more enflamed enthusiasts, with whom the bitterness of disappointment is ever proportioned to the extravagance of expectation, how unwilling must they be to resume a hope, which had thus deplorably deceived them? how flow to re-imbark in a cause, thus plainly desperate ? Such must have been the necessary tenor of their minds". And exactly conformable to this is the artless description which the evangelists record, of the feelings and conduct of their brethren. When the two disciples relate the crucifixion of their Lord, how full of perplexity and despondence is their narrative ". “ But we, said they, trusted that it had been he which “ should have redeemed Israel-When assembled together, it was with the doors Shut for fear of the Jews.”
But this state of doubt and dismay was foon changed to triumphant faith, and these very men became witnesses of the resurrection of their crucified Lord.
By what means was this wondrous change atchieved ? here it is the question principally rests. · Was their faith in this great article the impulse of enthu
· m Vid. this point very well illustrated by Dr. Archibald Campbell, in his discourse, to prove the apostles were not enthusiasts, from p. 47 to 70. - Luke xxiv, 21. . • John xx. 19.
fasm, or founded on the certainty of truth? Let us attend to the progrefs of this change.
Was it enthusiasm which moved them to reject the evidence of those women, who had seen a vision of angels, who said he was alive , and who afterwards spoke to him in perfono? Two of the apostles discovered, that the body was missing, but as yet they “ knew not the scripture, that he must rise from the “ dead;" they retired wondering, not believing".
· Could enthusiasm have deceived them into a belief, that a dead body no longer occupied the sepulchre in which they had seen it lodged, and which they deliberately and minutely examined ? how utterly impossible S! “ He appeared to two separately, but neither believed they them.” Was this extreme slowness of faith a mark of enthusiasm ? the very reverse ; it proves, that their minds were utterly void of every hope which might delude, and on their guard against every artifice that might deceive them.
But was it enthusiasm, to admit the evidence of their senses, when they repeatedly saw, and felt, and
P Luke xxiv. 1-11. ? Mark xvi. 11. John xx. 1--19. Luke xxiv. 12. Mark xvi. 12. :
s Paley's Evidences, p. 485, Dublin edition.-" The pre“ sence and the absence of the dead body, are alike inconsistent “ with the hypothesis of enthusiasm ; for if present, it must “ have cured their enthusiasm at once ; if absent, fraud, not “ enthusiasm, mult have carried it away." D 2
spoke to their Lord restored to life, when he we eat " and drank before them," when he invited them “ behold my hands and my feet that it is I myself ; “ handle me and fee, for å fpirit hath not Aesh and “ bones, as ye see me have"-when he called unto Thomas, who declared, except “ I shall "see in his " hands, the print of the nails, and thrust my hand " into his fide, I will not believe.” When even this proof was granted him, and extorted from the obstinacy of his scepticism, the exclamation of “ my “ Lord, and my God!” When he performed miraracles in their presence when “ for forty days toge“ ther he frequently conversed with them, expound
ing the things which belong to the kingdom of God ;" and finally, in the fight of all his apostles, afcended into "heaven, there to remain at the right hand of the Majesty on' high.
Was it enthusiasm to admit such evidence as this, which nothing but blindness or frenzy could reject ? -yet the proofs they received did not ceafe here ; forty days after they received the Spirit of God, descending with sensible signs, and resting upon them.-" They were all with one accord in one “ place, and suddenly there came a found, as of a “.rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house 6 where they were fitting, and there appeared to “ them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it fat “ upon each of them, and they were all filled with
+ Luke xxiv. 36–43. " John XX. 24, 25.) * Luke xxiv. 51. Acts i. 6.
Acts i. 3.