1780. which he called “ Senilia ;' in which he shews so little learning or taste in Ærat. 71. writing, as to make Carteret a dactyl.-In matters of genealogy it is necessary

to give the bare names as they are ; but in poetry, and in prose of any elegance in the writing, they require to have inflection given to them.--His book of the Dialects is a sad heap of confusion; the only way to write on them is to tabulate them with Notes, added at the bottom of the page, and references.”

“ It may be questioned, whether there is not some mistake as to the methods of employing the poor, seemingly on a supposition that there is a certain portion of work left undone for want of persons to do it; but if that is otherwise, and all the materials we have are actually worked up, or all the manufactures we can use or dispose of are already executed, then what is given to the poor, who are to be set at work, must be taken from some who now have it, as time must be taken for learning, according to Sir William Petty's observation ; a certain part of those very materials that, as it is, are properly worked

up, must be spoiled by the unskilfulness of novices. We may apply to well-meaning, but misjudging persons in particular of this nature, what Giannone said to a monk, who wanted what he called to convert him : 'Tu ses santo ma Tu non ses Filosofo.'- It is an unhappy circumstance that one might give away five hundred pounds in a year to those that importune in the streets, and not do any good.”

“ There is nothing more likely to betray a man into absurdity than condescension ; when he seems to suppose his understanding too powerful for his company."

“ Having asked Mr. Langton if his father and mother had fate for their pictures, which he thought it right for each generation of a family to do, and being told they had opposed it, he said, “Sir, among the infractuosities of the human mind, I know not if it may not be one, that there is a superftitious reluctance to fit for a picture.”

“ John Gilbert Cooper related, that soon after the publication of his Dictionary, Garrick being asked by Johnson what people faid of it, tollen him, that among other animadversions, it was objected that he cited authorities which were beneath the dignity of such a work, and mentioned Richardson. * Nay, (said Johnson) I have done worse than that: I have cited thee, David.”

Talking of expence, he observed, with what munificence a great merchant will spend his money, both from his having it at command, and from his enlarged views by calculation of a good effect upon the whole. “Whereas

(faid

a

(faid he) you will hardly ever find a country gentleman who is not a good 1780. deal disconcerted at an unexpected occasion for his being obliged to lay out Arat. 77: ten pounds.”

“ When in good humour he would talk of his own writings with a wonderful frankness and candour, and would even criticise them with the closest feverity. One day, having read over one of his Ramblers, Mr. Langton asked him, how he liked that paper; he shook his head, and answered, 'too wordy.' And at another time, when one was reading his tragedy of • Irene,' to a company at a house in the country, he left the room ; and somebody having asked him the reason of this, he replied, “Sir, I thought it had been better.”

Talking of a point of delicate fcrupulosity of moral conduct, he said to Mr. Langton, . Men of harder minds than ours will do many things from which you and I would shrink ; yet, Sir, they will, perhaps, do more good in life than we. But let us try to help one another.

If there be a wrong twist, it may be set right. It is not probable that two people can be ,

wrong the same way."

“ Of the Preface to Capel's Shakspeare, he said, “If the man would have come to me, I would have endeavoured to 'endow his purposes with words ;' for, as it is, he doth gabble monstrously.”

" He related, that he had once in a dream a contest of wit with some other person, and that he was very much mortified by imagining that his opponent had the better of him. “Now (said he) one may mark here the effect of sleep in weakening the power of reflection ; for had not my judgement failed me, I should have seen, that the wit of this supposed antagonist, by whose superiority I felt myself depressed, was as much furnished by me, as that which I thought I had been uttering in my own character.”

“ One evening in company, an ingenious and learned gentleman read a letter of compliment to him from one of the Professors of a foreign University. Johnson, in an irritable fit, thinking there was too much oftentation, said, " I never receive any of these tributes of applause from abroad. One instance I recollect of a foreign publication, in which mention is made of l’illustre Lockman."

“ Of Sir Joshua Reynolds he said, “Sir, I know no man who has passed through life with more observation than Reynolds.”

“ He repeated to Mr. Langton, with great energy, in the Greek, our Saviour's gracious expression concerning the forgiveness of Mary Magdalen,

U 1 2

• Η πιεις

1780.

Ætat. 71.

"H 71515 08 OECWXE DE TOPEVOU #15 epnump. Thy faith hath saved thee; go in peace' He said, the manner of this disinission is exceedingly affecting.”

“ He thus defined the difference between physical and moral truth; Physical truth, is, when you tell a thing as it actually is. Moral truth, is, when you tell a thing sincerely and precisely as it appears to you. I say such

I a one walked across the street; if he really did so I told a physical truth.. If I thought so, though I should have been mistaken, I told a moral truth.”.

“ Huggins, the translator of Ariosto, and Mr. Thomas Warton, in the early part of his literary life, had a dispute concerning that poet; of whom Mr. Warton, in his · Observations on Spencer's Fairy Queen,' gave some account, which Huggins attempted to answer with violence, and said, “I will: militate no longer against his nescience.” Huggins was master of the subject, , but wanted expression. Mr. Warton's knowledge of it was then imperfect;. but his manner lively and elegant. Johnson said, 'It appears to me, that : Huggins has ball without powder, and Warton powder without ball.”

Talking of the Farce of High Life below Stairs,' he faid, "Here is a Farce, which is really very diverting when you see it acted; and yet one: may read it, and not know that one has been reading any thing at all.”.

“ He used at one time to go occasionally to the green-room of Drury-lane Theatre, where he was much regarded by the players, and was very easy and facetious with them. He had a very high opinion of Mrs. Clive's comick powers, and conversed more with her than with any of them. He said;

Clive, Sir, is a good thing to fit by, she always understands what you say.' And she said of him, ' I love to sit by Dr. Johnson, he always entertains me.' One night, when“ The Recruiting Officer was acted, he said to Mr. Holland, who had been expressing an apprehension that Dr. Johnson would disdain. the works of Farquhar ; ' No, Sir, I think Farquhar a man whose writings. have considerable merit."

“ His friend Garrick was so busy in conducting the drama, that they could not have so-much intercourse as Mr. Garrick used to profess an anxious with that there should be. There might indeed be something in the contemptuous severity as to the merit: of acting, which his . old preceptor nourished in himself, that would mortify Garrick after the great applause which he received from the audience. For though Johnson said of him, "Sir, a man who has a nation to admire him every night, may well be expected to be somewhat elated ;' yet he would treat theatrical matters with a

a

fudicrous night. He mentioned one evening, I met David coming off 1780. the stage, drest in a woman's riding-hood, when he acted in The Wonder ; Ætat. 77. I. came full upon him, and I believe he was not pleased.”

« Once he asked Tom Davies, whom he saw drest in a fine fuit of clothes, c. And what art thou to-night?' Tom answered, “The Thane of Ross ;' (which it will be recollected is a very inconsiderable character). O brave !'

" fáid Johnson.”

« Of Mr. Longley, at Rochester, a gentleman of very considerable learning; whom Dr. Johnson met there, he said, "My heart warms towards him. I was surprized to find in him such a nice acquaintance with the metre in the learned languages; though I was somewhat mortified that I had it not fo much to myself, as I should have thought.”

“ Talking of the minuteness with which people will record the sayings of eminent persons, a story was told, that when Pope was on a visit to Spence at Oxford, as they looked from the window they saw a Gentleman Commoner, who was just come in from riding, amusing himself with whipping at a post. Pope took occasion to say, “That young gentleman seems to have little to do.! Mr. Beauclerk observed, ' Then, to be fure, Spence turned round and wrote that down ;' and went on to say to Dr. Johnson, ‘Pope, Sir, would have said the same of you, if he had seen you distilling. Johnson. "Sir,

if Pope had told me of my distilling, I would have told him of his 'grotto.”

“ He would allow no settled indulgence of idleness upon principle, and always repelled every attempt to urge excuses for it. A friend one day suggested, that it was not wholesome to study foon after dinner. Johnson. "Ah, Sir, don't give way to such a fancy. At one time of my life I had taken it into my head that it was not wholesome to study between breakfast and dinner.”

« Mr. Beauclerk one day repeated to Dr. Johnson, Pope's lines, .

a

. Let modest Foster, if he will; excel
". Ten metropolitans in preaching well :'

Then asked the Doctor, 'Why did Pope say this?". JOHNSON. 'Sir, he hoped it would vex somebody.”

“ Dr. Goldsmith, upon occasion of Mrs. Lennox's bringing out a play, said to Dr. Johnson at the Club, that a person had advised him to go and hiss it, because he had attacked Shakspeare in her book called · Shakspeare

Illustrated.'.

1780.

Ætat. 71.

Illustrated.' JOHNSON. “And did not you tell him that he was a rascal ?" GOLDSMITH. No, Sir, I did not. Perhaps he might not mean what he said.' JOHNson. “Nay, Sir, if he lied it is a different thing. Colman Nily faid, (but it is believed Dr. Johnson did not hear him,) · Then the proper expression should have been, —Sir, if you don't lie, you're a rascal.”

“ His affection for Topham Beauclerk was so great, that when Beauclerk was labouring under that severe illness which at last occasioned his death, Johnson faid, (with a voice faultering with emotion,) “Sir, I would walk to the extent of the diameter of the earth to save Beauclerk."

« One night at the Club he produced a translation of an Epitaph which Lord Elibank had written in English, for his Lady, and requested of Johnson to turn into Latin for him. Having read Domina de North et Gray, he said to Dyer, “You see, Sir, what barbarisms we are compelled to make use of, when modern titles are to be specifically mentioned in Latin infcriptions.' When he had read it once aloud, and there had been a general approbation expresied by the company, he addressed himself to Mr. Dyer in particular, and said, “Sir, I beg to have your judgement, for I know your nicety.' Dyer then very properly desired to read it over again ; which, having done, he pointed out an incongruity in one of the sentences. Johnson immediately assented to the observation, and said, “Sir, this is owing to an alteration of a part of the sentence, from the form in which I had first written it; and I believe, Sir, you may have remarked, that it is a very frequent cause of errour in composition, when one has made a partial change, without a due regard to the general structure of the sentence.”

“ Johnson was well acquainted with Mr. Doslie, authour of a treatise on Agriculture ; and said of him, “Sir, of the objects which the Society of Arts have chiefly in view, the chymical effects of bodies operating upon other bodies, he knows more than almost any man.' Johnson, in order to give Mr. Dossie his vote to be a member of this Society, paid up an arrear which had run on for two years. On this occasion he mentioned a circumstance, as characteristick of the Scotch. * One of that nation, (said he,) who had been a candidate, against whom I had voted, came up to me with a civil falutation. Now, Sir, this is their

way. An Englishman would have stomached it, and been sulky, and never have taken further notice of you: but a Scotchman, Sir, though you vote nineteen times against him, will accost you with equal complaisance after each time, and the twentieth time, Sir, he will get your vote.”

“ Talking

a