1783. Ætat. 74. “ It is a very good custom to keep a journal for a man's own use; he may write upon a card a day all that is necesary to be written, after he has had experience of life. At first there is a great deal to be written, because there is a great deal of novelty. But when once a man has settled his opinions, there is feldom much to be set down." “ There is nothing wonderful in the journal which we see Swift kept in London, for it contains Night topicks, and it might soon be written." I praised the accuracy of an account book of a private person whom I mentioned. Johnson. “ Keeping accounts, Sir, is of no use when a man is spending his own money, and has nobody to whom he is to account. You won't eat less beef to-day, because you have written down what it cost yesterday.” I mentioned a lady who thought as he did, so that her husband could not get her to keep an account of the expence of the family, as the thought it enough that she never exceeded the fum allowed her. Johnson. “ Sir, it is fit she should keep an account, because her husband wishes it; but I do not see its use.” I maintained that keeping an account has this advantage, that it fatisfies a man that his money has not been lost or stolen, which he might sometimes be apt to imagine, were there no written state of his expence; and besides, a calculation of economy fo as not to exceed one's income, cannot be made without a view of the different articles in figures, that one may fee how to retrench in some particulars lefs necessary than others. This he did not attempt to answer. Talking of an acquaintance of ours, whose narratives, which abounded in curious and interesting topicks, were unhappily found to be very fabulous; I mentioned Lord Mansfield's having said to me, “ Suppose we believe one half of what he tells.” Johnson. “ Aye; but we don't know which half to believe. By his lying we lose not only our reverence for him, but all comfort in his conversation.” Boswell. « May we not take it as amusing fiction?" Johnson. “ Sir, the misfortune is, that you will infensibly believe as much of it as you incline.” It is remarkable, that notwithstanding their congeniality in politicks, he never was acquainted with a late eminent noble judge, whom I have heard speak of him as a writer, with great respect. Johnson, I know not upon what degree of investigation, entertained no exalted opinion of his Lordship’s intellectual character. Talking of him to me one day, he said, “ It is wonderful, Sir, with how little real superiority of mind men can make an eminent figure in publick life.” He expressed himself to the same purpose concerning another law Lord, who, it seems, once took a fancy to associate with the wits of а of London ; but with so little success, that Foote said, “What can he mean 1783. After repeating to him some of his pointed lively sayings, I said, “ It is When I recalled his having said as we failed upon Lochlomond, “ That if * Nec fufferre queat majoris pondera gemmæ.” On Thursday, April 10, I introduced to him, at his house in Bolt-court, • Knowing as well as I do, what precision and elegance of oratory his Lordship can display, After 1783. Ætar. 74. After some compliments on both sides, the tour which Johnson and I had « Boswell. “ This has been a very factious reign, owing to the too great Johnson . We have had an unsuc- On Saturday, April 12, I visited him, in company with Mr. Windham, of Norfolk, whom, though a Whig, he highly valued. One of the best things he ever said was to this gentleman; who, before he set out for Ireland as Secretary to Lord Northington, when Lord Lieutenant, expressed to the Sage some modest and virtuous doubts, whether he could bring himself to practise those arts which it is fuppofed a person in that situation has occasion to employ. “ Don't be afraid, Sir, (said Johnson, with a pleasant smile,) you will soon make a very pretty rascal.” to do. 1783. Ætat. 74. He talked to-day a good deal of the wonderful extent and variety of London, and observed, that men of curious enquiry might see in it such modes of life as very few could even imagine. He in particular recommended to us to explore Wapping, which we resolved to do, and certainly shall. Mr. Lowe the painter, who was with him, was very much distressed that a large picture which he had painted was refused to be received into the exhibition of the Royal Academy. Mrs. Thrale knew Johnson's character so superficially, as to represent him as unwilling to do small acts of benevolence; and mentions, in particular, that he would hardly take the trouble to write a letter in favour of his friends. The truth, however, is, that he was remarkable, in an extraordinary degree, for what she denies to him ; and, above all, for this very sort of kindness, writing letters for those to whom his solicitations might be of service. He now gave Mr. Lowe the following, of which I was diligent enough, with his permission, to take copies at the next coffeehouse, while Mr. Windham was so good as to stay by me. To Sir JOSHUA RERNOLD S. « SIR, a “ MR. Lowe considers himself as cut off from all credit and all hope, by the rejection of his picture from the Exhibition. Upon this work he has exhausted all his powers, and suspended all his expectations : and certainly, to be refused an opportunity of taking the opinion of the publick, is in itself a very great hardship. It is to be condemned without a trial. “ If you could procure the revocation of this incapacitating edict, you would deliver an unhappy man from great affiction. The Council has sometimes reversed its own determination; and I hope, that by your interposition this luckless picture may be got admitted. I am, &c. I “ April 12, 1783. SAM. JOHNson." To Mr. BARRY, « SIR, “ Mr. Lowe's exclusion from the Exhibition gives him more trouble than you and the other gentlemen of the Council could imagine or intend. He considers disgrace and ruin as the inevitable consequence of your determination. “ He says, that some pictures have been received after rejection; and if there be any such precedent, I earnestly intreat that you will use your interest L 11 2 in 1783. in his favour. Of his work, I can say nothing: I pretend not to judge of Ætat. 74. painting ; and this picture I never saw: but I conceive it extremely hard to Mut out any man from the possibility of success; and therefore I repeat my request that you will propose the re-consideration of Mr. Lowe's case; and if there be any among the Council with whom my name can have any weight, be pleased to communicate to them the desire of, Sir, « Your most humble servant, April 12, 1783 SAM. Johnson." Such intercession was too powerful to be resisted, and Mr. Lowe's performance was admitted at Somerset-house. The subject, as I recollect, was the Deluge, at that point of time when the water was verging to the top of the last uncovered mountain. Near to the spot was seen the last of the antediluvian race, exclusive of those who were saved in the ark of Noah. This was one of those giants, then the inhabitants of the earth, who had still strength to swim, and with one of his hands held aloft his infant child. Upon the small remaining dry spot appeared a familhed lion, ready to spring at the child and devour it. Mr. Lowe told me that Johnson said to him, “Sir, yonr picture is noble and probable.”—“A compliment, indeed, (faid Mr. Lowe,) from a man who cannot lie, and cannot be mistaken.” About this time he wrote to Mrs. Lucy Porter, mentioning his bad health, and that he intended a visit to Lichfield. “ It is (says he) with no great expectation of amendment that I make every year a journey into the country; but it is pleasant to visit those whose kindness has been often experienced.” On April 18, (being Good-Friday,) I found him at breakfast, in his usual manner upon that day, drinking tea without milk, and eating a cross-bun to prevent faintness; we went to St. Clement's church, as formerly. When we came home from church he placed himself on one of the stone feats at his garden-door, and I took the other, and thus in the open air and in a placid frame, he talked away very easily. Johnson. “ Were I a country gentleman, I should not be very hospitable, I should not have crowds in my house." Boswell. “ Sir Alexander Dick tells me, that he remembers having a thousand people in a year to dine at his house; that is reckoning each person one each time that he dined there.” JOHNSON. “ That, Sir, is about three a day.” Boswell.“ How your statement lessens the idea.” Johnson. “ That, Sir, is the good of counting. It brings every thing to a certainty which before floated in the mind indefinitely.” Boswell. " But Omne ignotum |