Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub

V

son, perseveres to the end? How came it to pass that God, not as a mere prediction of what the self-determining power would do, but as a promise of what he himself would accomplish in reward of Christ, pledged himself to him that they all should remain steadfast? This doctrine of perseverance can consist with nothing but God's absolute dominion over the mind, either by efficiency or by motives. If this doctrine is true the rest of Dr Fitch's theory falls.

Now then for the proof of these assertions. Dr Fitch says, "We earnestly object to that Antinomian scheme which makes grace terminate solely on dispensing with free agency; by an act of mere omnipotence creating a new heart, and thus leaving none of the elements which constitute the moral certainty of a conversion in the agent himself."* "If Dr Fisk wishes to show that God does not create the volitions of moral agents, he has our hearty consent."+ "Dr Fisk maintains, and, we think, truly, that any act of the creature brought into existence by the mere efficiency of God, cannot be an accountable act." In that passage, "No man can come to me except the Father-draw him," for draw he reads induce; confining the whole operation to the mere influence of motives. He says approvingly, Dr Fisk "maintains that God is not the sole agent in the universe; that there is an entire and complete cause of moral action lying out of him, în the existence of a free agent. Such an agent then, on Dr Fisk's principles, has power to sin notwithstanding any amount of influence which his Maker can bring upon him § 637.

* 633.

† 599.

600.

short of destroying his freedom.

Does Dr Fisk know,

can he prove, that of beings who have thus the power to sin, any moral system could have been formed in which some of these beings would not use that power? Can he prove that the alternative presented to God in creation was not this; no moral system, or a system in which some of his subjects would abuse the high prerogative of freedom and rebel?" This is enough to show his opinion respecting the power of God to control by motives in regeneration. For if by motives God could infallibly bring back the depraved Peter and all other selected sinners, by motives he could in all cases have prevented the fall of spotless spirits.

[ocr errors]

God's "purpose," continues Dr Fitch, was to confer on the beings composing his moral kingdom, the power of volition and choice, and to use the best influence God could use on the whole to secure the holiness and prevent the sin of such beings, who themselves, and not he, were to have immediate power over their volitions.—And it is still true that he desires their obedience,-and, without hindering the return of any, uses all the influence he can without sacrificing a greater good, to induce them to return."+ Now if there is any frankness in these expressions, their meaning must be, that God does as much by his Spirit for one as another; for if he does the best he can for all, he can do no more for a part. If there is any reservation made by such expressions as "on the whole," and "without sacrificing a greater good," nothing at all is said. If Dr Fitch means only that God does the best he can for each

[blocks in formation]

consistently with the highest good of the universe, he says no more than the strongest advocate for efficiency would allow. And such a limitation of a universal proposition, designed to assert God's utmost efforts to recover independent beings, would not be fair. But he goes on. "Whatever degree or kind of influence is used with them, to favour their return to him, at any given time,—is as strongly favourable to their conversion as it can be made amid the obstacles which a world of guilty and rebellious moral agents oppose to God's works of grace." In a note he says, "We do not mean that these influences do not become more powerful at future times, [as knowledge increases, I suppose ;] but at each moment God is able to say, What more could have been done to my vineyard that I have not done!"* Then surely he does as much by his Spirit for one as another according to the knowledge they possess: at all events he cannot absolutely control the mind by motives. The writer proceeds. "Human rebellion and wickedness oppose obstacles to a work of grace in our world, and hindrances to salvation, which the God of grace cannot wholly overcome; and—the measures of grace now pursued-overcome those obstacles to a further extent than any other system of measures would do."+ He does "every thing to encourage and persuade them to return,— which he can do amid the obstacles opposed by their sins." "He could not effect more as a whole, to recover those who had destroyed themselves."§. God "desires from the heart that all men-comply;-brings all those kinds and all that degree of influence-upon each individual, which § 621.

* 632. + 633.

± 634.

a system of measures best arranged for the success of grace in a world of rebellion allows."* "The purpose of election" brings God into measures "to gain whom in the `

And yet, (with what asks, “Why do given

methods of his wisdom he can." consistency let others judge,) he sinners repent?-Does God use no influence and means to induce sinners?-Are these influences and means brought to bear alike on all nations and on all individuals?" If not, with what propriety could it be so often said, he does the best he can for all consistently with the general interest of holiness in our world? ›

According to Dr Fitch, God foresaw, not what he would do, either by efficiency or the absolute control of motives, but what the self-determining power would do if he created such beings and placed them under such a system of government and grace; and that, antecedent, in the order of nature, to any design on his part even to create ; for this foresight of what the self-determining power would do if created, was the very motive which induced him to create and to bring forward such a system of government and grace; and this decision to create and to enter on such measures when he foresaw the result, was itself the decree of election,-was itself the predestination of all things, not excepting sin itself. Hear Dr Fitch. "God's foreknowledge of what would be the results of his present works of grace, [results proceeding neither from efficiency nor the absolute control of motives,] preceded, in the order of nature, the purpose to pursue those works and presented the grounds of that purpose. [The grounds therefore of

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

creation; for the whole creation was comprehended in the plan of redemption. "All things were created by him, (Christ,) and FOR him."] Thus Peter, when writing to the brethren,-states-that through the calls of the Gospel-the Holy Spirit induced them to obey ;-and in this very way, according to the foreknowledge of God, were they chosen to this happy state.—Thus too Paul-refers to the fact that such persons are the called according to his purpose; and adds, as we should paraphrase the passage, For whom he did foreknow,' as the people who would be gained to his holy kingdom by his present works of grace, (in which result lay the whole objective motive for undertaking these works,)' he did also,' by resolving on those works, 'predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son;' and by performing those works he calls, justifies, and glorifies. Foresight then of the good results in sinners redeemed, which the present measures of grace if pursued would secure, is asserted to precede the prospective election of them in the eternal purpose of God, and the accomplished election of them through the influence of the Spirit. The passages therefore, while they fully maintain a personal election made by God, contradict alone that idea of it which considers the selection of particular individuals as the first thing in the order of nature, and not as the foreseen result of God's using with a world of sinners the best means, (including the influence of the Spirit,) for their recovery. Thus their prospective election was only a determination to bring forward such a system of grace and persuasion, when it was foreseen who would be persuaded; * 622, 3.

« AnteriorContinuar »