31. GARDINER, W. H. The psychology of the affections in Plato and Aristotle. I. Plato. Phil. Rev., 1918, 27, 469-488.

32. GARDINER, W. H. The psychology of the affections in Plato and Aristotle. II. Aristotle. Phil. Rev., 1919, 28, 1-26.

33. GILDERMEISTER, M. Julius Richard Ewald. Zsch. f. Sinnesphysiol., 1921, 53, 123-128.

34. GOLDMAN, H. The applied psychology of Hugo Münsterberg. J. of Appl. Psychol., 1918, 2, 116–129.

35. GRADENIGO, G. Est-ce vraiment à Helmholtz qu'on doit attribuer la théorie sur l'audition qui porte son nom? Les précuseurs: Duverney (1683), Valsalva (1704). Le Créateur: Cotugno (1761). Arch. ital. de biol., 1919, 69, 33-47.

;

36. GRADENIGO, -; GEMELLI, -; ROMAGNA-MANOIA, -; SAFFIOTTI, -; AND AGGarrotti, -. Ricerche fisiopsicologiche can

GALEOTTI,
didati all' aviazione militare. Giorn. med. mil., 1919, 1-240.

37. GRIFFITH, C. R. Some neglected aspects of a history of psychology. Psychol. Monog., 1921, 30 (No. 136), 17–29.

38. GUICCIARDI, G. Augusto Tamburini. Riv. sper. di fren., 1920, 44, i-xix. 39. HALL, G. S. Morale in war and after. PSYCHOL. BULL., 1918, 15, 361426.

40. HALL, G. S. Practical relations between psychology and the war. J. of Appl. Psychol., 1917, 1, 9–16.

41. HALL, G. S. Some relations between the war and psychology. Amer. J. of Psychol., 1919, 30, 211-223.

42. HENNING, H. Der Geruch. Zsch. f. Psychol., 1915, 73, 161-257; 1916, 74, 305-443; 76, 1-127.

43. HENNING, H. Die Qualitätenreihe des Geschmacks. Zsch. f. Psychol., 1916, 74, 203-219.

44. HENNING, H. Ernst Mach, als Philosoph, Physiker und Psycholog. Eine Monographie. Leipzig: Barth, 1915. Pp. xviii+185.

45. HERING, H. E. Fünf Reden von Ewald Hering. Leipzig: Engelmann, 1921. Pp. 140.

46. HESS, C. Ein Nachruff auf Ewald Hering. Arch. f. Augenhk., 1917, 83, 89-97.

47. HICKS, G. D. Obituary, Professor G. T. Ladd. Nature, 1921, 108, 23-24. 48. HowISON, G. N. Josiah Royce: the significance of his work in philosophy. Phil. Rev., 1916, 25, 231-245.

49. JASTROW, J. Charles S. Pierce as a teacher. J. of Phil., Psychol., etc., 1916, 13, 723-725.

50. KARPINSKI, L. C. Hermann von Helmholtz. Scient. Mo., 1921, 13, 24-32.

51. KRAEPELIN, E. Wilhelm Wundt. Zsch. f. d. ges. Neur. u. Psychiat., 1920, 61, 351-362.

52. KRAUS, O. Franz Brentano. Münschen: Beck, 1919. Pp. xii+171. 53. LADD-FRANKLIN, C. Charles S. Pierce at the Johns Hopkins. J. of Phil,, Psychol., etc., 1916, 13, 715-722.

54. LENOIR, R. La psychologie de Ribot et la pensée contemporaine. Rev. de métaphys. et de morale, 1919, 26, 739–763. Monist, 1920, 30, 365–394.

55. LIEB, J. W. Leonardo da Vinci: natural philosopher and engineer. J. of Franklin Inst., 1921, 191, 767-806; 192, 47–68.

56. LLOYD, A. H. Psychophysical parallelism: a psychological episode in history. J. of Phil., Psychol., etc., 1917, 14, 561-570.

57. LODGE, O. In memory of Lord Raleigh, O.M., F.R.S. Proc. Soc. Psych. Res., 1920, 31, I-II.

58. LOEWENBERG, J. S. The James-Lange theory in Lessing. Amer. J. of Psychol., 1917, 28, 301.

59. LOMBROSO, G. Come mio padre venne all'antropologia criminale. Arch. di antrop. crim., 1921, 41, 419-437.

60. LUBARSCH, O. Rudolph Virchow und sein Werk. Berl. klin. Woch., 1921, 58, 1345-1349.

61. MCCLURE, M. T. Francis Bacon and the modern spirit. J. of Phil.,

Psychol., etc., 1917, 14, 520–527.

62. McGEOCH, J. A. The present status of Psychology. Colorado Coll. Publ., Gen. Series, No. 103, 1919.

63. Manual of Medical Research Laboratory. Washington: War Dept., Govt. Print. Office, 1918. Pp. 255.

64. MENDENHALL, T. C. von Helmholtz. Amer. J. of Physiol. Opt., 1921,

2, 115-120.

65. MOORE, C. B. Association.

66. MURSELL, J. L.

Notes on the presidents of the American Psychological
Amer. J. of Psychol., 1918, 29, 347-349.

The function of intuition in Descartes' philosophy of science. Phil. Rev., 1919, 28, 370-409.

67. OLGIATI, F. Un pensatore Americano: Josiah Royce. Milano: Via Mazzini, 1917. Pp. 114.

68. PILLSBURY, W. B. The new development in psychology in the past quarter century. Phil. Rev., 1917, 26, 56–69.

69. Proceedings of the Annual Meetings of the Amer. Psychol. Assn. PSYCHOL. BULL., 1917, 14, 33-80; 1918, 15, 25-56; 1919, 16, 33-61; 1920, 17, 33-82; 1921, 18, 57-108; 1922, 19, 65–115.

70. RICH, J. G. A preliminary study of tonal volume. J. of Exper. Psychol., 1916, 1, 13-22.

71. RICH, J. G. A study of tonal attributes. Amer. J. of Psychol., 1919, 30, 121-164.

72. RILEY, W.

Historical contributions. PSYCHOL. BULL., 1916, 13, 1-4;

1917, 14, 1-3; 1918, 15, 1-4; 1919, 16, 1–3.

73. ROBACK, A. A. 1917, 3, 596-597.

Jewish pillars of psychology. Amer. Jewish Chron.,

74. ROBACK, A. A. The Jewish founders of collective psychology. Amer. Jewish Chron., 1917, 3, 671-673.

75. ROYCE, J., and KERNAN, F. Charles Saunders Pierce. J. of Phil., Psychol., etc., 1916, 13, 701–708.

76. RUCKMICK, C. A. The last decade of psychology in review. PSYCHOL. BULL., 1916, 13, 109-120.

77, SAFFIOTTI, F. U. La evoluzione della psicologia sperimentale in Italia. Riv. di psicol., 1920, 16, 129-153.

78. SCOTT, W. D. Changes in some of our conceptions and practices of personnel. Psychol. Rev., 1920, 27, 81-94.

79. SEASHORE, C. E. George Trumbull Ladd. Science, 1921, 54, 242. 80. SHEARD, C. Thomas Young: the father of physiological optics Amer. J. of Physiol. Opt., 1920, 1, 9-14.

81. STERN, W. Hugo Münsterberg: in memoriam. J. of Appl. Psychol., 1917, 1, 186-188.

82. STRATTON, G. M. Theophrastus and the Greek physiological psychology before Aristotle. New York: Macmillan, 1917. Pp. 227.

83. STRONG, E. K. Work of the committee on classification of personnel in the army. J. of Appl. Psychol., 1918, 2, 130–139.

84. STUDENTS, HIS AMERICAN. In memory of Wilhelm Wundt. Psychol. Rev., 1921, 28, 153–188.

85. STUMPF, H. Gedächtnisrede auf Benno Erdmann. Setzber. der preuss. Akad. d. Wiss., 1921, 497–508.

86. TAYLOR, H. O. The medieval mind. A history of the development of thought and emotion in the middle ages. (2 vols., 3rd Amer. ed.) London: Macmillan, 1920. Pp. 600+630.

87. TERMAN, L. M. The use of intelligence tests in the army. PSYCHOL. BULL., 1918, 15, 177-187.

88. THORNDIKE, E. L. Scientific personnel work in the army. Science, 1919, 49, 53-61.

89. TITCHENER, E. B. Brentano and Wundt: Empirical and Experimental Psychology. Amer. J. of Psychol., 1921, 32, 108–120.

90. TITCHENER, E. B.

108-120.

Wilhelm Wundt. Amer. J. of Psychol., 1921, 32,

91. TITCHENER, E. B. Wilhelm Wundt, 1832-1920. Science, 1920, 52, 500

502.

92. VAN BIÉMA, E. Comment Malebranche conçoit la psychologie. Rev. de métaphys. et de morale, 1916, 23, 127–146.

93. VERWORN, M. Ewald Hering. Zsch. f. allg. Physiol., 1919, 18, 97-104. 94. VILLA, E. Armando Theodulo Ribot. Riv. d. fil., 1917, 9, 101-109. 95. WADDINGTON, M. M. The development of British thought. Toronto: Dent & Sons, 1919. Pp. 194.

96. WARREN, H. C. Mental Association from Plata to Hume. Psychol. Rev., 1916, 23, 203-231.

97. WARREN, H. C. A history of the association psychology. New York: Scribner, 1921. Pp. ix+328.

99. Washburn, M. F. The last quarter century in psychology. Phil. Rev., 1917, 26, 46–55.

98. WASHBURN, M. F. Introspection as an objective method. Psychol. Rev., 1922, 29, 89-112.

100. WATT, H. J. The psychology of sound. Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1917.

Pp. viii+241.

101. WATSON, J. B. The place of the conditioned reflex in psychology. Psychol. Rev., 1916, 23, 89–116.

102. WELLER, C. V.

33-39. 103. WHEELER, W. M.

Rudolph Virchow-Pathologist. Scient. Mo., 1921, 13,

Jean-Henri Fabre. J. of Animal Behav., 1916, 6,

74-80.

104. WHIPPLE, G. M. The obtaining of information: Psychology of Observation and report. PSYCHOL.. BULL., 1918, 15, 217-248.

105. WILDE, N. Rousseau's doctrine of the right to believe. Mind, 1917, 26, 12-28.

106. WIRTH, W. Unserem grossen Lehrer Wilhelm Wundt in unanslöschlicher Dankbarkeit zum gedächtnis! Arch. f. d. ges. Psychol., 1920, 40, i-xvi.

107. WRIGHT, J. The blood and soul in ancient belief. N. Y. Med. J., 1918, 108, 93-98; 225-227; 271-277.

108. WRIGHTSON, T. An Inquiry into the Analytical Mechanism of the Internal Ear. London: Macmillan, 1918. Pp. xi+254.

109. YERKES, R. M. 1917, 14, 259–263.

Psychology and the national service. PSYCHOL. BULL.,

110. YERKES, R. M. Psychology and the national service. J. of Appl. Psychol., 1917, 1, 301-304.

III. YERKES, R. M.

25, 85-115.

Psychology in relation to the war. Psychol. Rev., 1918,

112. YERKES, R. M. Report of the Psychology Committee of the National Research Council. Psychol. Rev., 1919, 26, 83-149.

113. YERKES, R. M. (ED.). Memoirs of the Nat. Acad. Sci., 1921, 15, 1-890. 114. YERKES, R. M., and OTHERS. National Research Council. The national intelligence tests. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1920. Pp. 32.

115. YOAKUM, C. S., and YERKES, R. M. Army mental tests. New York: Holt, 1920. Pp. 303.

116. ANON. Auguste Tamburini. In Memoriam. Roma: Unione Editrice, 1920. Pp. 278.

117. ANON.

679-681.

Elmer Ernest Southard. Obituary. Ment. Hygiene, 1920, 4,

118. ANON. How the army uses individual differences in experience. PSYCHOL. BULL., 1918, 15, 187-206.

119. ANON. Medical studies in aviation (IV. Psychologic observations and methods). J. of Amer. Med. Ass., 1918, 71, 1382–1400.

120. ANON. Wilhelm Wundt. Münch. med. Woch., 1921, 521–525.

THE EVOLUTION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TEXTBOOKS

SINCE 1912

By J. ROBERT KANTOR
University of Indiana

A study of the psychological textbooks published during the last ten years reveals changes innumerable, reflecting modifications in the conceptions of the subject-matter and the principles of psychology. Such changes are mirrored in the general organization of material as well as in the specific contents of the texts. Especially noteworthy is the emphasis on the genetic development of simpler adaptations into more and more complex ones, and further the inclusion of chapters on behavior, on language, learning, intelligence and other topics which found little or no place in psychology books of the previous decade. Much of this is, of course, to be expected because of the inevitable addition to knowledge which the earnest search by students must bring forth. But on the other hand, the question forces itself upon the reviewer of psychological textbooks whether the observed changes and additions merely represent such normal accretions. Or do they also symptomatize developmental trends in a particular direction? Is there not, such a surveyor must ask himself, some apparent goal toward which the science of psychology is tending?

Evidence convinces us that there is present today a characteristic inclination of our recent textbooks; that is, they represent a new manner of looking upon the facts of psychology. So much we might says with confidence, even if we cannot discern striking complete advances in viewpoint and method. Coincident with the fact that the books of the present decade show no diminution in their stress of biological factors is another fact, namely, that more and more are psychologists stressing biological factors in organic rather than in structural or physiological terms. That is to say, psychologists are attempting to express facts more and more in terms of the complete organism rather than in specific parts (brain, etc.) or isolated functions (neural). The emphasis of the organic, however, does not exhaust the changes we find in the psychological domain.