Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub

Mr. Adams for it. He had done it all to conciliate these last; but they had made him play their game for their own purposes not for his; they were not gained, and his own friends were alienated. The election followed before a new man could be agreed on, on the part of the federalists; Mr. Adams, again inevitable, was this time beaten, and Mr. Jefferson and his friends came in; and if Mr. Gibbs is to be relied on, Satan came also among them.

"There was established a new order of things, when the unrestrained and ungoverned passions of the mass, breaking through self-imposed restrictions, should make, interpret, and execute the law; when the executive, as leader of the people, should disregard the voice of their representatives, and render nugatory the acts of the tribunals of justice; when party should supersede the idea of country."

It is a little remarkable, that under this new order of things, Wolcott, the amiable and truly honorable man, whose papers have furnished the ground-work of these volumes, passed over to the democratic ranks, and was elected governor of Connecticut by democratic votes, about the time of the last war with England. His example, one would think, would admonish his grandson that party invective, in such general terms as these we have quoted, could not possibly be just; and we counsel Mr. Gibbs, when he resumes his able pen, to acknowledge the faults, and admit the merits, of both parties, as we are ourselves reciprocally willing and desirous to do. We see the faults of Mr. Jefferson's character as plainly as we see those of John Adams; but we are not disposed to turn him over to reprobation in such unmeasured language as has been habitually poured out upon him by the federal press. Let it never be forgotten that he held a high place among the earliest supporters of resistance and revolution; that he took that place when it was a

doubtful and most dangerous position, and when timid, interested and unprincipled men did naturally, and must almust necessarily all turn the other way. He took that place then, actuated by principles and impulses which must have been sincere; and as to his political faith, there is no act of his life that can be quoted against either its sincerity or its consistency. He was, from first to last, a radical democrat and leveller, thoroughgoing, unflinching-and, it must also be admitted, was unscrupulous. He sympathized warmly and deeply with the French revolutionists; and having this sympathy, he never lost sight of it through the worst of their excesses and outrages. He thought, no doubt, and history will sustain the opinion, that the Reign of Terror was better than the Reign of the Bourbons and the old noblesse: the one a fearful but transient fever-the other a chronic, corrupting and consuming cancer. In this sympathy, and in his revolutionary hatred to England, may be found the sufficient motives for Mr. Jefferson's general political course; while by that course itself must be explained the intense aversion he excited in men full of prejudices and passions, equally strong and diametrically opposite. And then he was ambitious, and artificial, and insincere; he managed men by flattery and hollow professions for his own ends, of which John Adams was a conspicuous example. He could countenance and subsidize such base tools as Callender and Paine.In short, the head and front of his offending was a practical adherence to the maxim that all is fair in politics*-a most pernicious maxim certainly; but we cannot agree with Mr. Gibbs that Mr. Jefferson acted on it with ulterior designs to overthrow our liberties or dissolve our social system. He was, no doubt, a heretic in his religion; and for this only, without a single other vice, he might have met in New-England at that time all the condemnation his

[* The tone which the accomplished writer of this paper has adopted in discussing the character of Jefferson has both surprised and pained us. We have too high a respect both for our correspondent's ethical and political standards of judgment to exercise towards these passages the extreme editorial prerogative; though his view of Jefferson's morale is so contrary to that which democrats are accustomed to entertain, that in the absence of any accompanying proof or illustration of its correctness, we should feel perfectly justified in refusing to give it circulation as we do to give it our confidence. We make bold to say that it is worth no one's while to publish the writer's opinion of Jefferson's consciousness without sustaining himself at every step by the inflexible logic of facts.]-EDITOR.

worst acts, or any man's worst acts could possibly incur.

Mr. Jefferson was the impersonation and centre of the anti-federal partysuch was their earliest appellation; the party opposed to that Federal Constitution under which, with slight modifications, we have lived happy from those days to these. Opposition to its federal or centralizing principles continued, however, to be the chief rallying ground of that party, down to the eventual dying out of the old party distinctions and names-before the recasting into whigs and democrats in these latter days. On this main ground of difference, experience showed the anti-federalists that their fears were so much exaggerated, that when they obtained power they refrained from changing the Constitution they had denounced thus succeeding in some sort to the opinions as well as the offices of the expelled federalists. With regard to the navy, also, a similar conversion followed; and eventually Gen. Jackson gave sufficient proof that we had abandoned our undue predilection for France. Indeed, for many years, while the names of federalist and anti-federalist continued to be used, the struggle had really become a personal one;-it was an effort to put down certain men and their friends and promote certain others, rather than a contest between the upholders of opposite political creeds. The single question, whether we should or should not make war on England, formed the principal exception to this remark: there was a remnant here of the original grounds of contention between the two parties; but in all else they had become in a great measure alike in all but names.

The democratic party is essentially progressive. It can cast off its errors, and in its nature must do so; it can take up the more correct views of those adversaries that chance to have such, and can act on those views better than those adversaries did, and can thus occupy their places and wield the very weapons of their faith. By a progress of this kind the anti-federalists of '89 are become the democracy of '46; they are not the same in party doctrine, as we have seen, but they are the same in feeling, with doctrines enlightened by experience. By a transmigration equally natural, but not similar, the body of whiggery has entertained the soul of

federalism-not its high soul, but its narrow one, for it had two. There were men in the federal ranks who wished for aristocratic or even arbitrary government here; John Adams repeatedly betrayed such opinions or wishes, in unequivocal language; and others can still be named who shared them. Governeur Morris speaks them out plainly in his correspondence; and even Hamilton is well-known to have desired an Executive and Senate for life, or good behavior, which last qualification is usually practically null.Hamilton, had he lived, would have been capable of modifying his opinions by the lights of future experience; but nothing of this sort would have been expected from the other two we have named. And herein lies now the inherent difference between democrat and whig. Hamilton was for permanent rulers; for a government bank, and a protective tariff-three principles which comport together well, but which, if he had lived till now, we believe he would have abandoned, one and all. Not so the whigs; the reign of Mr. Biddle has made no more impression on their creed than did the Reign of Terror on Mr. Jefferson's. It was Bank once and Bank always; Tariff once and Tariff forever; and, with less boldless in avowing the truth than Adams and Morris exhibited, they cherish under a thin disguise the same old heresy still, that rulers are not appointed to perform duties, but to exercise powers. These three dead weights are tied to their heels-nay, grown to them and become inseparable; and to float these, it is not to be wondered at that they grasp at every cork and straw that the political whirlpool throws up.

It is remarkable that Hamilton places his argument in favor of a protective tariff on grounds entirely different from those occupied by the whigs at present, and on grounds, indeed, they cannot take in this age. He adopted the protection principle in all its length and breadth; he maintained that the General Government had the power to prohibit importations directly, or to prevent them by prohibitory duties; though he did not think such extreme measures necessary.

He admitted that protection would interfere with the natural employments of capital, and drive it from certain employments to certain others, and this, also, he thought gov

ernment had a right to do. He admitted that protection would raise prices; but he contended that the public would be speedily compensated by a consequent fall, and thus put the whole matter in the light of a temporary inconvenience and sacrifice for the attainment of an END. We were then a weak nation, liable to have the seas closed upon us; therefore, he argued, we ought to provide for that contingency by forcing a growth of home manufactures. The protective doctrine was then dominant abroad, and rigidly enforced against us; therefore, he contended, we ought to adopt it against others; and he admitted fully, that free trade, if reciprocal, would be best for all parties. His two principal arguments, thus-of weakness in us and liability to forced insulation, and of illiberal systems elsewhere, fall to the ground of themselves at present; and the other, of temporary expediency, is confuted by forty years' experiment which leaves the END as far out of sight as ever.

In addition to all the errors which the whigs have fairly inherited from federalism, they are perfectly willing, also, to adopt all ours when they can find any tempting opportunity. They are apt, indeed, to copy and caricature our vices and mistakes, and seem to have an idea, which, with their views of the popular intellect, is natural perhaps, that it is to these we owe our success and domination. Mr. Gibbs relates, that when Mr. Jefferson was made Vice-President, there was a cry raised by his adherents of British influence against his opponents. Doubtless it was a poor partisan trick, and worthy of the contempt with which he relates it. But what our dregs did then, whig dregs do now; the cry of a British tariff is not yet silent, and Mr. Gibbs knows who raised it. Again, we find (vol. i. p. 123,) that the French party were strongly supported, especially in Virginia, by the debtors to Great Britain, who desired to prevent any settlement of our difficulties with that power, to postpone or avoid altogether the payment of their debts. To such unworthy allies, no doubt, the party owed some votes; but we believe they never were called out and marshalled to the polls as anti-creditors. They were a disorganizing faction, but they were not called in with banners flying, and set up on that interest for office.

The whig embrace of the anti-renters has bettered the instruction; it is a piece of political scoundrelism which baffles all our previously conceived ideas as to what men will and will not do. Success with such allies will draw severe trials after it; and we wait with curious eyes to see what promises the anti-renters will produce and prove, and what fulfilment and satisfaction the whigs can give them.

Oliver Wolcott, whose modest biography mingles in the mass of these volumes in small proportion, is, nevertheless, exhibited here as he was :-as a man of first rate abilities and high and sterling virtues. He retired from the Treasury in 1799, and never again appeared in the arena of general politics, but became, afterwards, Governor of Connecticut, and died in that office (we believe,) about 1812. Of such a man as he was, the most violent political polemic must confess that the party with which he sided could not be entirely and profligately wrong; and it is well for humanity that such men do occasionally give irrefragable testimony of this sort in favor of both parties in our country. Wolcott did so by passing from federalism to democracy; Patrick Henry in his last days made a partial or entire change in the opposite direction. The truth is, the points on which the masses among us are not agreed, are as nothing, compared with the immense amount of ascertained political truth concerning which there is no longer any dispute. This is a great cause of the happiness and prosperity of our existing commonwealth; and one of the greatest drawbacks from this happiness is found in the violence of office-seekers and self-appointed partyleaders, who seize for their own ends on whatever points of difference may yet be discovered, exaggerate their practical importance immeasurably, and excite us through vain fears to party bitterness and dissention. Writers who ought to be independent-who should seek to give a tone rather than take one ready-made, do often fall into this error, and give strong aid to this mischief.We beseech Mr. Gibbs to believe and remember this, that when he writes again he may address a more general public, and not, as now, in some degree,

"narrow his mind, And to party give up what was meant for mankind."

THE NATURAL HISTORY OF NEW-YORK.*

THE reports of the several individuals who were entrusted with the scientific survey of New-York having at length been completed, we proceed, in accordance with a promise made to the

readers of this Review some months ago, to offer a few considerations relating to the less abstruse and technical, or more popular topics connected with it. We shall, however, confine our remarks to those portions of it connected with the geology and mineralogy of the state.

But we have, first, somewhat to say of the report as a whole. It consists of 13 large quarto volumes, of from 500 to 1000 pages each, and a map of the state, of suitable dimensions, upon which are delineated the areas embraced by its different rocks. And to such good hands, we are happy to say it, was the conduct of these volumes entrusted, from the manuscript to their present form, that no one will be likely to look upon them either as unworthy of their subject matter, or as very particularly misrepresenting the state of the art typographical in America in 1842.

Prefatory to the whole is a historical notice of New-York, by Gov. Seward, from which the following history of the survey is extracted:

"In 1835 the Assembly of this state, upon motion of Charles P. Clinch of NewYork city, passed a resolution directing the Secretary of State to report to the Legis lature, at its next session, the most expedient method for obtaining a complete geological survey of the state, which should furnish a perfect and scientific account of rocks and soils and their localities, and a list of all its mineralogical, botanical and zoological productions, and for procuring and preserving specimens of the same, with an estimate of the expense of the undertaking. John A. Dix, Secretary of State, in January, 1836, submitted a report in pursuance of this resolution. That luminous and satisfactory document led to the passage of the act of the 15th April,

1836, in the execution of which, and the act of May 8th, 1840, and of April 9th, 1842, the survey has been made. William L. Marcy, Governor, arranged the plan of the survey in the summer of 1836, and assigned its departments as follows:

"The zoological department to James E. Dekay; the botanical to John Torrey; the mineralogical and chemical to Lewis C. Beck; the geological to William M. Mather, Timothy A. Conrad, Lardner Vanuxem and Ebenezer Emmons. Afterwards Mr. James Hall was appointed to the department occupied by Mr. Conrad, and Mr. Conrad to a new departmentthe paleontological, the department of fossils."

The geologists divided the state into four districts, each one assuming a single district. The whole survey was finished in 1842, when the final reports were published. By the mineralogical and geological surveyors eight separate suites of specimens were collected, one or two of which were deposited in Albany, and one in each of the colleges of the state. So, also, the botanical and mineralogical surveyors collected and deposited at the cabinet in Albany, as far as possible, complete suites of specimens of their respective departments.

Each of these gentlemen, except Mr. Conrad, has made a report of his investigations. Mr. Dekay's consists of five volumes, the first containing descriptions of 45 genera and 79 species of mammals; the second of 124 genera and 314 species of birds; the third of reptiles, 17 genera and 33 species, and of amphibials, 9 genera and 30 species; the fourth, 57 genera and 299 species of fishes; and the fifth of 134 genera and 706 species of malluscan, and 80 genera and 139 species of crustacean animals found within the limits of the state. Mr. Torrey has published one volume containing the plants of NewYork. Dr. L. C. Beck one volume, with descriptions, including chemical

Natural History of New-York. By Authority. New-York: D. Appleton & Co., and Wiley & Putnam. Boston: Gould, Kendall & Lincoln, Albany: Thurlow Weed, Printer to the State. 1842. 12 vols., quarto; with a Map.

[blocks in formation]

analyses, localities, and economical uses of over 150 genera of minerals found in the state. Mr. Mather reports upon the geology of the first geological district, comprising Long Island and the river counties; Dr. Emmons of the second, consisting of the seven northernmost counties; Mr. Vanuxem of the fourteen central counties; and Mr. Hall of the fourth district, embracing all west of Cayuga lake.

Mr. Conrad's report upon the palæontology of New-York will, we have been informed, be ready for distribution in January next, when the work will be finally completed.

Its cost, including the survey, printing, binding, engraving and coloring plates, when finished, has been estimated by a committee of the Senate at $365,590 64; an amount, we are told, far beyond its value. We cannot, of course, say how highly this amount of money is esteemed by those who thus estimate the value of the whole survey. We cannot tell exactly how many mills upon a thousand dollars of the taxable property of New-York this sum would be. But we do say, that the value of such a work as this is not to be lightly rated. It is not altogether to be estimated in dollars and cents. Can it be possible, that some thousands of volumes filled with a minute and particular description of the natural scenery, rocks, minerals, flora, and fauna of a great state like New-York, can be scattered among its cities and villages and hamlets without an influence upon its inhabitants? And what must this influence be? belittleing in its character? Teaching its growing sons to think less of an ancestry, and less of institutions to which such a work is due ? An uneducated and an unenlightened people could never have undertaken it.

Nor can its immediate effect upon the character of the next generation be unhappy. Salem witches have, it is true, disappeared; but if the public did but know it, divining-rods and fortune-tellers' stones and glasses, and "moon in the sign of the heart," and agricultural labor put off for the proper change of the moon, and almanac Fridays, are not yet entirely done away, even within those enlightened portions of the world -New-York and New-England.

If fifty thousand highly-finished and complete treatises upon natural sci

ence can be scattered over the state, without fetching out of an else-veiled obscurity some if not Davy, or Cuvier, or Linnæus-at least here and there a worthy disciple to the shrine where they worshipped, then do we greatly overestimate the native worth of this particular portion of Anglo-Saxondom.

Mascula

Proles, Sabellis docta ligonibus
Versare glebas.

Copies of the report of this survey have been presented to every public library of note in Europe. We are happy in the belief, that there it can reflect no discredit on the young and distant republic that created it.

For the Empire State not to have undertaken such a work at all, in which she was but an imitator, would have been, not only parsimonious, but of that order of parsimony known as "penny-wise and pound-foolish ;” not to have done it well would have been niggardly. For, even in a pecuniary point of view, the value of the geological and mineralogical portions of the survey is of the highest importance to the people of New-York.

We do not know, nor can we estimate from any data in our possession, the amount of money expended within the last hundred years, by our citizens in valueless mining operations. But we do know something of that rage, with which otherwise sensible men squander money in such speculations. One of the least wonderful incidentsthough often quoted as the reverse-of the early settlement of the United States, was the loading and transmission to England of a ship-load of shining sand-(sulphuret of iron)-in the hope that it was gold. We know two wells sunk, one more than a hundred, and the other about three times as many feet, through the Trenton and Black River limestones, in a worse than hopeless search for brine. The geologists mention repeated instances of a like character. We have known men subject themselves to considerable expense in attempting to extract silver from a dark-colored heavy stone, composed in a great part of carburet of iron. We have seen so common and unpeculiar a mineral as sahlite, taken, at some cost and trouble, to a distant

« AnteriorContinuar »