Leonardo; that is to say, incapable in their way, of any improvement conceivable by human mind.

Also, it is only by comparison with such that we are authorized to affirm definite faults in any of his others, for we should have been bound to speak, at least for the present, with the same modesty respecting even his worst pictures of this class, had not his more noble efforts given us canons of criticism.

But, as was beforehand to be expected from the difficulties he grappled with, Turner is exceedingly unequal; he appears always as a champion in the thick of fight, sometimes with his foot on his enemies' necks, sometimes staggered or struck to his once or twice altogether down. He has failed most frequently, as before noticed, in elaborate compositions, from redundant quantity; sometimes, like most other men, from overcare, as very signally in a large and most labored drawing of Bamborough; sometimes, unaccountably, his eye for color seeming to fail him for a time, as in a large painting of Rome from the Forum, and in the Cicero's Villa, Building of Carthage, and the picture of this year in the British Institution; and sometimes I am sorry to say, criminally, from taking licenses which he must know to be illegitimate, or indulging in conventionalities which he does not require.

On such instances I shall not insist, for the finding fault with Turner is not, I think, either decorous in myself or like to be beneficial to the reader. The greater number of failures took

* One point, however, it is incumbent upon me to notice, being no question of art but of material. The reader will have observed that I strictly limited the perfection of Turner's works to the time of their first appearing on the walls of the Royal Academy. It bitterly grieves me to have to do this, but the fact is indeed so. No picture of Turner's is seen in perfection a month after it is painted. The Walhalla cracked before it had been eight days in the Academy rooms; the vermilions frequently lose lustre long before the exhibition is over; and when all the colors begin to get hard a year or two after the picture is painted, a painful deadness and opacity comes over them, the whites especially becoming lifeless, and many of the warmer passages settling into a hard valueless brown, even if the paint remains perfectly firm, which is far from being always the case. I believe that in some measure these results are unavoidable, the colors being so peculiarly blended and mingled in Turner's present manner as almost to necessitate their irregular drying; but that they are not necessary to the extent in

eflection of

place in the transition period, when the artist was ry recent feeling for the new qualities, and endeavoring to reconcile them with more careful elaboration of than was properly consistent with them. Gradually his became more free, his perception and grasp of the new s more certain, and his choice of subject more adapted to xhibition of them. But his powers did not attain their est results till towards the year 1840, about which period did so suddenly, and with a vigor and concentration which red his pictures at that time almost incomparable with which had preceded them. The drawings of Nemi, and wesel, in the possession of B. G. Windus, Esq., were among rst evidences of this sudden advance; only the foliage in of these is inferior; and it is remarkable that in this phase s art, Turner has drawn little foliage, and that little badly

they sometimes take place, is proved by the comparative safety of even of the more brilliant works. Thus the Old Temeraire is nearly à color, and quite firm; while the Juliet and her Nurse is now the of what it was; the Slaver shows no cracks, though it is chilled in of the darker passages, while the Walhalla and several of the recent es cracked in the Royal Academy. It is true that the damage makes ther progress after the first year or two, and that even in its altered he picture is always valuable and records its intention; but it is bito be regretted that so great a painter should not leave a single work ich in succeeding ages he might be estimated. The fact of his using so imperfect, together with that of his utter neglect of the pictures in n gallery, are a phenomenon in human mind which appears to me y inexplicable; and both are without excuse. If the effects he desires t be to their full extent produced except by these treacherous means, cture only should be painted each year as an exhibition of immediate , and the rest should be carried out, whatever the expense of labor me in safe materials, even at the risk of some deterioration of immeeffect. That which is greatest in him is entirely independent of ; much of what he now accomplishes illegitimately might without be attained in securer modes-what cannot should without hesitation ndoned. Fortunately the drawings appear subject to no such deteri1. Many of them are now almost destroyed, but this has been I always through ill treatment, or has been the case only with very works. I have myself known no instance of a drawing properly proand not rashly exposed to light suffering the slightest change. The oes of Turner, as of all other great colorists especially, are the picture r and the mounter.

-the great characteristic of it being its power, beauty, and majesty of color, and its abandonment of all littleness and division of thought to a single impression. In the year 1842, he made some drawings from recent sketches in Switzerland; these, with some produced in the following years, all of Swiss subject, I consider to be, on the whole, the most characteristic and perfect works he has ever produced. The Academy pictures were far inferior to them; but among these examples of the same power were not wanting, more especially in the smaller pictures of Venice. The Sun of Venice, going to sea; the San Benedetto, looking towards Fusina; and a view of Murano, with the Cemetery, were all faultless: another of Venice, seen from near Fusina, with sunlight and moonlight mixed (1844) was, I think, when I first saw it, (and it still remains little injured,) the most perfectly beautiful piece of color of all that I have seen produced by human hands, by any means, or at any period. Of the exhibition of 1845, I have only seen a small Venice, (still I believe in the artist's possession,) and the two whaling subjects. The Venice is a second-rate work, and the two others altogether unworthy of him.

In conclusion of our present sketch of the course of landscape art, it may be generally stated that Turner is the only painter, so far as I know, who has ever drawn the sky, (not the clear sky, which we before saw belonged exclusively to the religious schools, but the various forms and phenomena of the cloudy heavens,) all previous artists having only represented it typically or partially; but he absolutely and universally he is the only painter who has ever drawn a mountain, or a stone; no other man ever having learned their organization, or possessed himself of their spirit, except in part and obscurely, (the one or two stones noted of Tintoret's, (Vol. II., Part III. Ch. 3,) are perhaps hardly enough on which to found an exception in his favor.) He is the only painter who ever drew the stem of a tree, Titian having come the nearest before him, and excelling him in the muscular development of the larger trunks, (though sometimes losing the woody strength in a serpent-like flaccidity,) but missing the grace and character of the ramifications. He is the only painter who has ever represented the surface of calm, or the force of agitated water; who has represented the effects of space on dis

t objects, or who has rendered the abstract beauty of natural or. These assertions I make deliberately, after careful weighand consideration, in no spirit of dispute, or momentary I; but from strong and convinced feeling, and with the con-usness of being able to prove them.

Difficulty of

This proof is only partially and incidentally attempted in the sent portion of this work, which was originally written, as re explained, for a temporary purpose, and which, therefore, ould have gladly cancelled, but that, relating as it does only imple matters of fact and not to those of feeling, it may - perhaps, be of service to some readers who would be uning to enter into the more speculative fields with which the succeeding sections are concerned. I leave, therestration in fore, nearly as it was originally written, the followsubjects. ing examination of the relative truthfulness of elder of recent art; always requesting the reader to remember, as excuse for the inadequate execution, even of what I have attempted, how difficult it is to express or explain, by uage only, those delicate qualities of the object of sense, on seizing of which all refined truth of representation depends. for instance, to explain in language the exact qualities of ines on which depend the whole truth and beauty of expresabout the half-opened lips of Raffaelle's St. Catherine. e is, indeed, nothing in landscape so ineffable as this; but e is no part nor portion of God's works in which the delicacy eciable by a cultivated eye, and necessary to be rendered in is not beyond all expression and explanation; I cannot tell u, if you do not see it. And thus I have been entirely le, in the following pages, to demonstrate clearly anything ally deep and perfect truth; nothing but what is coarse and nonplace, in matters to be judged of by the senses, is within reach of argument. How much or how little I have done be judged of by the reader : how much it is impossible to have more fully shown in the concluding section. shall first take into consideration those general truths, comto all the objects of nature, which are productive of what ally called "effect," that is to say, truths of tone, general space, and light. I shall then investigate the truths of fic form and color, in the four great component parts of scape-sky, earth, water, and vegetation.

SECTION II.

OF GENERAL TRUTHS.

CHAPTER I.

OF TRUTH OF TONE.

As I have already allowed, that in effects of tone, the old masters have never yet been equalled; and as this is the first, and nearly the last, concession I shall have to make to them, I $1. Meaning of wish it at once to be thoroughly understood how the word "tone:" far it extends.

First, the right

in shadow to the

principal light.

relation of objects I understand two things by the word "tone :" -first, the exact relief and relation of objects against and to each other in substance and darkness, as they are nearer or more distant, and the perfect relation of the shades of all of them to the chief light of the picture, whether that be sky, water, or anything else. Secondly, the exact § 2. Secondly, the quality of color relation of the colors of the shadows to the colors by which it is

upon it.

felt to owe part of the lights, so that they may be at once felt to of its brightness to the hue of light be merely different degrees of the same light; and the accurate relation among the illuminated parts themselves, with respect to the degree in which they are influenced by the color of the light itself, whether warm or cold; so that the whole of the picture (or, where several tones are united, those parts of it which are under each,) may be felt to be in one climate, under one kind of light, and in one kind of atmosphere; this being chiefly dependent on that peculiar and inexplicable quality of each color laid on, which makes the eye feel both what is the actual color of the object represented, and that it is raised to its apparent pitch by illumination. A very bright brown, for instance, out of sunshine, may be precisely of the same shade of color as a very dead or cold brown in sun