find in the

§ 4. And partial absence in the Dutch.

Even

pose, reading it by the ordinary daylight of your room,) out of the sun; and this weak and secondary shadow is all that we ever Italian masters, as indicative of sunshine. Cuyp and Berghem, though they know thoroughly well what they are about in their foregrounds, forget the principle in their distances; and though in Claude's seaports, where he has plain architecture to deal with, he gives us something like real shadows along the stones, the moment we come to ground and foliage with lateral light, away go the shadows and the sun together. In the Marriage of Isaac and Rebecca, in our own gallery, the trunks of the trees between the water-wheel and the white figure in the middle distance, are dark and visible; but their shadows are scarcely discernible on the ground, and are quite vague and lost in the building. In nature, every bit of the shadow would have been darker than the darkest part of the trunks, and both on the ground and building would have been defined and conspicuous; while the trunks themselves would have been faint, confused, and indistinguishable, in their illumined parts, from the grass or distance. So in Poussin's Phocion, the shadow of the stick on the stone in the right-hand corner, is shaded off and lost, while you see the stick plain all the way. In nature's sunlight it would have been the direct reverse-you would have seen the shadow black and sharp all the way down, but you would have had to look for the stick, which in all probability would in several places have been confused with the stone behind it.

And so throughout the works of Claude, Poussin, and Salvator, we shall find, especially in their conventional foliage, and unarticulated barbarisms of rock, that their whole sum and substance of chiaroscuro is merely the gradation and variation which nature gives in the body of her shadows, and that all which they do to express sunshine, she does to vary shade. They take only one step, while she always takes two; marking, in the first place, with violent decision, the great transition from sun to shade, and then varying the shade itself with a thousand gentle gradations and double shadows, in themselves equivalent, and more than equivalent, to all that the old masters did for their entire chiaroscuro.

Now if there be one principle, or secret more than another, on which Turner depends for attaining brilliancy of light, it is

his respect.

s clear and exquisite drawing of the shadows. Whatever is obscure, misty, or undefined in his objects or his The perfection Turner's works atmosphere, he takes care that the shadows be sharp and clear-and then he knows that the light Il take care of itself, and he makes them clear, not by black-ss, but by excessive evenness, unity, and sharpness of edge. e will keep them clear and distinct, and make them felt as adows, though they are so faint, that, but for their decisive rms, we should not have observed them for darkness at all. e will throw them one after another like transparent veils, ong the earth and upon the air, till the whole picture palpites with them, and yet the darkest of them will be a faint ay, imbued and penetrated with light. The pavement on the ft of the Hero and Leander, is about the most thorough piece of is kind of sorcery that I remember in art; but of the general inciple, not one of his works is without constant evidence. ake the vignette of the garden opposite the title-page of Rogs's Poems, and note the drawing of the nearest balustrade on e right. The balusters themselves are faint and misty, and e light through them feeble; but the shadows of them are arp and dark, and the intervening light as intense as it can - left. And see how much more distinct the shadow of the nning figure is on the pavement, than the checkers of the vement itself. Observe the shadows on the trunk of the tree page 91, how they conquer all the details of the trunk itself, nd become darker and more conspicuous than any part of the oughs or limbs, and so in the vignette to Campbell's Beechee's Petition. Take the beautiful concentration of all that is ost characteristic of Italy as she is, at page 168 of Rogers's aly, where we have the long shadows of the trunks made by r the most conspicuous thing in the whole foreground, and ear how Wordsworth, the keenest-eyed of all modern poets for hat is deep and essential in nature, illustrates Turner here, as e shall find him doing in all other points.

Le

66 At the root

Of that tall pine, the shadow of whose bare
And slender stem, while here I sit at eve,

Oft stretches tow'rds me, like a long straight path,
Traced faintly in the greensward.”

EXCURSION, Book VI.

$6. The effect of

the light.

So again in the Rhymer's Glen, (Illustrations to Scott,) note the intertwining of the shadows across the path, and the checkering of the trunks by them; and again on the bridge in the Armstrong's Tower; and yet more in the long avenue of Brienne, where we have a length of two or three miles expressed by the playing shadows alone, and the whole picture filled with sunshine by the long lines of darkness cast by the figures on the snow. The Hampton Court in the England series, is another very striking instance. In fact, the general system of execution observable in all Turner's drawings, is to work his grounds richly and fully, sometimes stippling, and giving infinity of delicate, mysterious, and ceaseless detail; and on the ground so prepared to cast his shadows with one dash of the brush, leaving an excessively sharp edge of watery color. Such at least is commonly the case in such coarse and broad instances as those I have above given. Words are not accurate enough, his shadows upon nor delicate enough to express or trace the constant, all-pervading influence of the finer and vaguer shadows throughout his works, that thrilling influence which gives to the light they leave, its passion and its power. There is not a stone, not a leaf, not a cloud, over which light is not felt to be actually passing and palpitating before our eyes. There is the motion, the actual wave and radiation of the darted beam-not the dull universal daylight, which falls on the landscape without life, or direction, or speculation, equal on all things and dead on all things; but the breathing, animated, exulting light, which feels, and receives, and rejoices, and acts -which chooses one thing and rejects another-which seeks, and finds, and loses again-leaping from rock to rock, from leaf to leaf, from wave to wave,-glowing, or flashing, or scintillating, according to what it strikes, or in its holier moods, absorbing and enfolding all things in the deep fulness of its repose, and then again losing itself in bewilderment, and doubt, and dimness; or perishing and passing away, entangled in drifting mist, or melted into melancholy air, but still,-kindling, or declining, sparkling or still, it is the living light, which breathes in its deepest, most entranced rest, which sleeps, but never dies.

I need scarcely insist farther on the marked distinction between the works of the old masters and those of the great

ween almost all

ient and mod

odern landscape-painters in this respect. It is one which the The distinc- reader can perfectly well work out for himself, by holds good the slightest systematic attention,-one which he works of the will find existing, not merely between this work schools. and that, but throughout the whole body of their oductions, and down to every leaf and line. And a little reful watching of nature, especially in her foliage and foreounds, and comparison of her with Claude, Gaspar Poussin, d Salvator, will soon show him that those artists worked tirely on conventional principles, not representing what they w, but what they thought would make a handsome picture; d even when they went to nature, which I believe to have en a very much rarer practice with them than their biograers would have us suppose, they copied her like children, drawg what they knew to be there, but not what they saw there.* believe you may search the foregrounds of Claude, from one d of Europe to another, and you will not find the shadow of e leaf cast upon another. You will find leaf after leaf painted ore or less boldly or brightly out of the black ground, and you ll find dark leaves defined in perfect form upon the light; but u will not find the form of a single leaf disguised or interpted by the shadow of another. And Poussin and Salvator e still farther from anything like genuine truth. There is thing in their pictures which might not be manufactured in eir painting-room, with a branch or two of brambles and a nch or two of weeds before them, to give them the form of e leaves. And it is refreshing to turn from their ignorant d impotent repetitions of childish conception, to the clear, ose, genuine studies of modern artists; for it is not Turner ly, (though here, as in all other points, the first,) who is rearkable for fine and expressive decision of chiaroscuro. Some ssages by J. D. Harding are thoroughly admirable in this spect, though this master is getting a little too much into a bit of general keen execution, which prevents the parts which ght to be especially decisive from being felt as such, and hich makes his pictures, especially the large ones, look a little in. But some of his later passages of rock foreground have,

* Compare Sect. II. Chap. II. § 6.

taken in the abstract, been beyond all praise, owing to the exquisite forms and firm expressiveness of their shadows. And the chiaroscuro of Stanfield is equally deserving of the most attentive study.

The second point to which I wish at present to direct attention has reference to the arrangement of light and shade. It is the constant habit of nature to use both her highest lights and deepest shadows in exceedingly small quantity; principle of chior- always in points, never in masses. She will give

§ 8. Second great

oscuro. Both high light and deep shadow are used

a large mass of tender light in sky or water, im. in equal quantity pressive by its quantity, and a large mass of tender and only in points. shadow relieved against it, in foliage, or hill, or building; but the light is always subdued if it be extensive-the shadow always feeble if it be broad. She will then fill up all the rest of her picture with middle tints and pale grays of some sort or another, and on this quiet and harmonious whole, she will touch her high lights in spots-the foam of an isolated wave -the sail of a solitary vessel-the flash of the sun from a wet roof-the gleam of a single whitewashed cottage-or some such sources of local brilliancy, she will use so vividly and delicately as to throw everything else into definite shade by comparison. And then taking up the gloom, she will use the black hollows of some overhanging bank, or the black dress of some shaded figure, or the depth of some sunless chink of wall or window, so sharply as to throw everything else into definite light by comparison; thus reducing the whole mass of her picture to a delicate middle tint, approaching, of course, here to light, and there to gloom; but yet sharply separated from the utmost degrees either of the one or the other.

§ 9. Neglect or

this principle by

Now it is a curious thing that none of our writers on art seem to have noticed the great principle of nature in this respect. They all talk of deep shadow as a thing that may be given in quantity,-one fourth of the picture, or, in certain contradiction of effects, much more. Barry, for instance, says that writers on art. the practice of the great painters, who "best understood the effects of chiaroscuro," was, for the most part, to make the mass of middle tint larger than the light, and the mass of dark larger than the masses of light and middle tint together, i.e., occupying more than one-half of the picture.