agreed to pay a premium of 200/. J. was in partnership with T., and the bankrupt owed them a joint debt exceeding the amount of the apprentice fee due from J. to the bankrupt. J. cannot set off the apprentice fee against the joint debt due from the bankrupt to J. and T.—Exp. Soames, 320. SUPERSEDEAS. On a petition by a creditor to supersede on the ground of concert, the Lord Chancellor had directed an issue, which was found in favour of the commission. The assignees and the creditor then presented a petition, the former for their costs, and the latter for a new trial. The Court of Review, being satisfied of the act of concert, superseded the commission at once.— Exp. Harwood, 252". TAXATION. An order was refused to tax a messenger's bill, which had been paid five years ago, where there was no recent discovery of any fraudulent charge contained in it.—Exp. Willment, 364. USURY. 1. A. employs B. as a calico printer, and before the accounts for printing become due, from time to time advances him various sums of money, charging him besides interest 11. 10s. per cent, as a trade premium, which it was customary for persons in the same trade to take under the like circumstances. A. was also in the habit of paying debts owing by B. to other persons before they became due, when A. deducted the usual discount, but charged B. with the full amount of the debt, besides interest and the trade premium above mentioned. Semble, that both those modes of dealing were usurious; they were, at least, of so suspicious a nature that the Court declined to make an order for the sale of property under a mortgage deed, but directed an action of ejectment to be brought by A. against the assignees.—Exp. Millington, 298. 2. Where sums of money advanced, and to be advanced, are secured by deed, and any of the dealings then contemplated are tainted with usury, the deed is wholly void as a security, although the legal debt is not impeached.—S. C. WAIVER. A formal objection to a notice of motion is waived by the party appearing and requesting further time to oppose it.—Exp. Morland, 248. LIST OF CASES. Common Law. Alchin v. Hopkins, 1 Bing. N. C. 99 .. . , .. .. Benefice Allen v. Wood, 1 Bing. N. C. 8 Husband and Wife, 4 Arden v. Mornington, 4 Tyr. 56 .. .. .. .. .. Venue, 1 Armstrong T. Lewis, 4 Moo. & Sc. 1; 2 C. & M. 274 .. Bill of Exceptions; Partnership, 1 Attorney-General v. Duramie, 2 C. & M. 393 .. .. Practice, 11 Aylwin v. Todd, 1 Bing. N. C. 170 Amendment, 2 Baker v. Gostling, 1 Bing. N. C. 19 .. .. Landlord and Tenant, 4 Barham v. Lee, 4 Moo. & S. 327 .. .. .. .. Practice, 7 Best v. Argles, 2 C. & M. 394 • • Insolvent Acts, 3 Bishop v. Hatch, and Chuter v. Hatch, 1 Ad. & E. 171 .. Insolvent Acts, 1 Booth v. Jacobs, 3 N. & M. 351. Bill of Exchange Botcheiley v. Lancaster, I Ad. & E. 77; 3 N. & M. 383 .. Bankruptcy, 1 Bourne v. Walker, 2 C. & M. 338; 4 Tyr. 121 Bail, 2 Biaithwaite v. Lord Montford, 2 C. & M. 408 .. Limitations, Statute of, 4 Britten v. Britten, 4 Tyr. 473 Lease, 2 Brown v. Lord Granville, 4 Moo. & S. 333 Writ of Error Burn v. Morris, 4 Tyr. 485 Trover, 2 Bush v. Parker, 1 Bing. N. C. 72 Trespass, 1 Bushby v. Fisher, 3 N. & M, 381 Landlord and Tenant, 2 Bushell v. Beavan, 1 Bing, N. C. 103 .. .. Frauds, Statute of, 1 Byne v. Currey, 4 Tyr. 478 .. .. .. .. .. Legacy Campbell v. Fleming, 1 Ad. & E. 40 .. .. .. Contract of Sale Canstable v. Andrew, 2 C. & M. 298 .. .. Debtor and Creditor, 2 Chambers v. Bernasconi, 4 Tyr. 531 .. .. .. .. Ejectment, 5 Clarance v. Marshall, 4 Tyr. 147 .. .. Money had and received, 3 Clark v. Marner, 3 Moo. & S. 171 Writ of Trial Act, 1 Clark v. Pedley, 4 Moo. & S. 321 .. .. .. .. Poor Rate, 4 Cockman v. Hellyer, 1 Bing. N. C. 1 .. .. Warrant of Attorney Cocks v. Nash, 4 Moo. & S. 162 .. .. Debtor and Creditor, 1 Cooper v. Blandy, 1 Bing, N. C. 45 .. .. Landlord and Tenant, 5 Crook v. Jadis, 3 N. & M. 257 Bill of Exchange, 5 Curtis v. Gieated, 1 Ad. & E. 167 Evidence, 4 y. Spitty, 1 Bing. N. C. 15 Pleading, 3 Dibbin v. Wilson, 3 N. & M. 260 Pleading, 2 Doe d. Draper v. Lawley, 3 N. & M. 331 • • .. .. Ejectment, 2 d. Harries v. Morse, 2 C. & M. 247 .. '.. .. Lease, 1 d,. Hornby v. Glenn, 1 Ad. & E. 49. .. Executor and Administrator, 2 Doe d. Lawford v. Roe, 1 Bing. N. C. 161 Ejectment, 4 d. Shaw v. Steward, 3 N. & M. 372 .. .. Husband and Wife, 3 d. Smith v. Webber, 1 Ad. & E. 119 .. Ejectment, 1; Evidence, 2 d. Tucker v. Roe, 4 Moo. & S. 165 Ejectment, 3 Ducket v. Williams, 2 C. & M. 348 Insurance, 2 Eicke v. Nokes, 1 Bing. N. C. 69 Bankruptcy, 5 Elston v. Braddick, 2 C. & M. 435; 4 Tyr. 123 .. .. Bankruptcy, 4 Foster v. Taylor, 3 N. & M. 244 Illegal Contract Fraser v. Swansea Canal Navigation Company, 3 N. Sc M. 391 Bankruptcy, 3; Canal Act; Limitation of Action; Trover, 1 Freeman v. Paganini, 4 Moo. & S. 165 .. ..' ..' .. Bail, 1 Furnival v. Stringer, 1 Bing. N. C. 68 Venue, 2 Gale v. Capern, 1 Ad. & E. 103 Limitations, Statute of, 1 Gilbert v. Downs, 1 Biag. N. C. 173 Tithes Gill, Exparte, 1 Bing. N. C. 168 Husband and Wife, 6 Governors of the Poor of Bristol v. Wait, 3 N. & M. 359 .. Poor Rate, 3 Hall v. Booth, 3 N. & M. 316 .. Arrest, 3 Hammond v. Hooley, 1 Bing. N. C. 31 .. .. .. Post-horse Duties Hanbury v. Ella, 1 Ad. & E. 61; 3 N. & M. 438 .. .. Amendment, 1 Hatsall v. Griffith, 4 Tyr. 487 .. .. .. Money had and received, 4 Haworth v. Hardcastle, 1 Bing. N. C. 182 Partnership, 5 Hayslep v. Gymer, 1 Ad. & E. 162 Evidence, 3 Heydon v. Thompson, 1 Ad. & E. 210; 3 N. & M. 319 .. .. Pleading, 1 Home v. Took, 4 Moo. & S. 183 Practice, 5 Howell v. Bulteel, 2 C. & M. 339 Practice, 10 Huber v. Steiner, 4 Moo. & S. 328 Practice, 8 Humphreys v. Harvey, 1 Bing. N. C. 61 . Attorney, 4 Ireland v. Johnson, 1 Bing. N. C. 162 .. Distress Irving v. Clegg, 1 Bing. N: C. 53 Charter-party, 2 In the matter of the London and Westminster Bank, 1 Bing. N. C. 197 . Practice, 3 Jackson v. Stopherd, 2 C. & M. 361 Partnership, 2 Jacobs v. Humphery, 2 C. & M. 413 .. '.. .. .. .. Sheriff James v. Dods, 2 C. & M. 266; 4 Tyr. 101 Way, 1 Jesse v. Roy, 4 Tyr. 626 .. .. • • Shipping Kensit v. Bulteel, 4 Tyr. 59 .. .. Practice, 10 King, Exp., 3 N. & M. 437 , ..' .. Attorney, 2 Kirwan v. Kirwan, 4 Tyr. 491 .. .. Partnership, 4 Knight v. Gibbs, 1 Ad. & E. 43 .. .. Slander, 1 Knowles v. Lynch, 4 Tyr. 477 Inferior Court M'Andiew T. Adams, 1 Bing. N. C. 29 .. .. .. Charter-party, 1 Marsh v. Keating, (in the House of Lords,) 1 Bing. N. C. 198 .. Money had and received, 2 Marston v. Downes, I Ad. &c E. 31.. Attorney, 1; Executor and Administrator, 1 Mayor of Lyme Regis v. Henley, 1 Bing. N. C. 222 .. .. Corporation Meekin v. Whalley, 1 Bing. N. C. 59 "Attorney, 3 Megginson v. Harper, 2 C. & M. 322; 4 Tyr. 94 .. Limitations, Stat, of, 3 Moore v. Taylor, 1 Ad. & E. 25; 3 N. & M. 406 .. .. Insurance, 1 Neville v. Cooper, 2 C. & M. 329 Trespass, 2 Noy v. Reynolds, 1 Ad. & E. 159 .. .. Money had and received, I Niblett v. Pottow, 1 Bing. N. C. 81 Turnpike Acts, 1 Northwaite v. Bennett, 2 C. & M. 316 Churchwarden, 1 Owen v. Burnett, 2 C. & M. 353; 4 Tyr. 133 Carriers' Act Pepper v. Whalley, 1 Bing. N. C. 71 .. .. .. .. Process, 2 Pickford v. Davis, 1 Bing. N. C. 141 Turnpike Acts, 2 Pitt v. Coombs, 3 N. & M. 212 Arrest, 2 Plimmer v. Sells, 3 N. & M. 422 Husband and Wife, 2 Rees v. Morgan, 3 N. & M. 205 .. .. Uniformity of Process Act Reid v. Lord Tenterden, 4 Tyr. Ill .. Executor and Administrator, 4 Rew v. Pettet, 1 Ad. & E. 196 .. .. .. Limitations, Statute of, 2 Rex v. Bloxam, 3 N. & M. 385 Sessions v. Archdeacon of Chester, 3 N. & M. 413 .. .. Churchwarden, 2 v. Trustees of Cheadle Savings Bank, 3 N. & M. 418.. Savings Bank Act, 2 v. of the Witham Savings Bank, 3 N, & M, 416 .. Savings Bank Act, 1 Richardson v. Gifford, 1 Ad. & E. 52; 3 N. & M. 325..Landlord and Tenant, 1 Ricketts v. "Lewis, 1 Ring. N. C. 196 .. Practice, 2 Roberts v. Wedderburne, 1 Bing. N. C. 4 .... .. .. Process, 1 Saffery v. Elgood, 1 Ad. & E. 191; 3 N. & M. 346 .. .. Rent Charge Sanderson v. Bell, 2 C. & M. 303, 304 .. .. Lien; Master and Servant Shinfield v. Laxton, 4 Moo. & S. 187 Practice, 6 Shortrede v. Cheek, 1 Ad. & E. 57 .. Guarantee Sibley v. Tomlins, 4 Tyr. 90 .. .. .. Slander, 2 Simons v. Farreu, 1 Bing. N. C. 126 .. •• •• •• •• Covenant Simpson v. Pt-nton, 2 C. & M. 430 Frauds, Statute of, 2 Skipper v. Lane, 4 Moo. & S. 283 .. .. .. Interpleader Act Solarte v. Palmer, (in the House of Lords,) 1 Bing. N. C. 194 ,. Bill of Exchange, 3 Sowerby v. Butcher, 2 C. & M. 368 Bill of Exchange, 4 Stephens v. Pejl, 4 Tyr. 6 .... .. Bankruptcy, 3 Strelton v. Busnaqh, 1 Bipg. N. C. 139 Husband and Wife, 5 Summers v. Moseley, 4 Tyr. 158 .. .. .. .. .. Arrest, 1 Summers v. Moseley, 4 Tyr. 158; and see Perry v. Gibson, 1 Ad. & Ed, 48, Subpoena Thorpe v. Eyre, 3 N. & M. 214 .... Insolvent Acts, 2; Landlord and Tenant, 3 Tremeere v. Morison, 1 Bing. N. C. 89 .. Executor and Administrator, 3 Trimbey v. Vignier, 1 Bing. N.C. 151 Bill of Exchange, 2 Turner v. Pye, 1 Ad. & E. 34; 3 N. & M. 354 Practice, 12 Wardroper v. Richardson, 1 Ad. & E. 75 .. .. Writ of Trial Act, 8 Whitbourne v. Pettifer, 4 Moo. & S. 182 Practice, 4 Wilkinson v. Byers, 1 Ad.& E. 106 Assumpsit Wills v. Nurse, 1 Ad. & E. 65 .. .. .. .. Husband and Wife, 1 Williams v. Harris, 1 Bing. N. C. 13 Practice, 1 dem., Harris, ten., 4 Moo. & S. 358 .. .. .. Practice, 9 Winter v. Elliott, 1 Ad. & E. 24; 3 N. & M. 315 Prisoner Woodin v. Burford, 2 C. & M. 391 .. .. Warranty Woolway v. Rowe, 1 Ad. & E. 114 .. .. .. .. Evidence, 1 Wright v. Doe d. Tatham, (in the Exchequer Chamber,) 1 Ad. & E. 1. 3 N. & M. 268 ... , .. Will Wright v. Walker, 4 Tyr. 502 .. ".. Way, 2 |