Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub

agreed to pay a premium of 200/. J. was in partnership with T., and the bankrupt owed them a joint debt exceeding the amount of the apprentice fee due from J. to the bankrupt. J. cannot set off the apprentice fee against the joint debt due from the bankrupt to J. and T.—Exp. Soames, 320.

SUPERSEDEAS.

On a petition by a creditor to supersede on the ground of concert, the Lord Chancellor had directed an issue, which was found in favour of the commission. The assignees and the creditor then presented a petition, the former for their costs, and the latter for a new trial. The Court of Review, being satisfied of the act of concert, superseded the commission at once.— Exp. Harwood, 252".

TAXATION.

An order was refused to tax a messenger's bill, which had been paid five years ago, where there was no recent discovery of any fraudulent charge contained in it.—Exp. Willment, 364.

USURY.

1. A. employs B. as a calico printer, and before the accounts for printing become due, from time to time advances him various sums of money, charging him besides interest 11. 10s. per cent, as a trade premium, which it was customary for persons in the same trade to take under the like circumstances. A. was also in the habit of paying debts owing by B. to other persons before they became due, when A. deducted the usual discount, but charged B. with the full amount of the debt, besides interest and the trade premium above mentioned. Semble, that both those modes of dealing were usurious; they were, at least, of so suspicious a nature that the Court declined to make an order for the sale of property under a mortgage deed, but directed an action of ejectment to be brought by A. against the assignees.—Exp. Millington, 298.

2. Where sums of money advanced, and to be advanced, are secured by deed, and any of the dealings then contemplated are tainted with usury, the deed is wholly void as a security, although the legal debt is not impeached.—S. C.

WAIVER.

A formal objection to a notice of motion is waived by the party appearing and requesting further time to oppose it.—Exp. Morland, 248.

LIST OF CASES.

Common Law.

Alchin v. Hopkins, 1 Bing. N. C. 99 .. . , .. .. Benefice

Allen v. Wood, 1 Bing. N. C. 8 Husband and Wife, 4

Arden v. Mornington, 4 Tyr. 56 .. .. .. .. .. Venue, 1

Armstrong T. Lewis, 4 Moo. & Sc. 1; 2 C. & M. 274 .. Bill of Exceptions;

Partnership, 1

Attorney-General v. Duramie, 2 C. & M. 393 .. .. Practice, 11 Aylwin v. Todd, 1 Bing. N. C. 170 Amendment, 2

Baker v. Gostling, 1 Bing. N. C. 19 .. .. Landlord and Tenant, 4

Barham v. Lee, 4 Moo. & S. 327 .. .. .. .. Practice, 7

Best v. Argles, 2 C. & M. 394 • • Insolvent Acts, 3

Bishop v. Hatch, and Chuter v. Hatch, 1 Ad. & E. 171 .. Insolvent Acts, 1

Booth v. Jacobs, 3 N. & M. 351. Bill of Exchange

Botcheiley v. Lancaster, I Ad. & E. 77; 3 N. & M. 383 .. Bankruptcy, 1

Bourne v. Walker, 2 C. & M. 338; 4 Tyr. 121 Bail, 2

Biaithwaite v. Lord Montford, 2 C. & M. 408 .. Limitations, Statute of, 4

Britten v. Britten, 4 Tyr. 473 Lease, 2

Brown v. Lord Granville, 4 Moo. & S. 333 Writ of Error

Burn v. Morris, 4 Tyr. 485 Trover, 2

Bush v. Parker, 1 Bing. N. C. 72 Trespass, 1

Bushby v. Fisher, 3 N. & M, 381 Landlord and Tenant, 2

Bushell v. Beavan, 1 Bing, N. C. 103 .. .. Frauds, Statute of, 1 Byne v. Currey, 4 Tyr. 478 .. .. .. .. .. Legacy

Campbell v. Fleming, 1 Ad. & E. 40 .. .. .. Contract of Sale

Canstable v. Andrew, 2 C. & M. 298 .. .. Debtor and Creditor, 2

Chambers v. Bernasconi, 4 Tyr. 531 .. .. .. .. Ejectment, 5

Clarance v. Marshall, 4 Tyr. 147 .. .. Money had and received, 3

Clark v. Marner, 3 Moo. & S. 171 Writ of Trial Act, 1

Clark v. Pedley, 4 Moo. & S. 321 .. .. .. .. Poor Rate, 4

Cockman v. Hellyer, 1 Bing. N. C. 1 .. .. Warrant of Attorney

Cocks v. Nash, 4 Moo. & S. 162 .. .. Debtor and Creditor, 1

Cooper v. Blandy, 1 Bing, N. C. 45 .. .. Landlord and Tenant, 5

Crook v. Jadis, 3 N. & M. 257 Bill of Exchange, 5

Curtis v. Gieated, 1 Ad. & E. 167 Evidence, 4

y. Spitty, 1 Bing. N. C. 15 Pleading, 3

Dibbin v. Wilson, 3 N. & M. 260 Pleading, 2

Doe d. Draper v. Lawley, 3 N. & M. 331 • • .. .. Ejectment, 2

d. Harries v. Morse, 2 C. & M. 247 .. '.. .. Lease, 1

d,. Hornby v. Glenn, 1 Ad. & E. 49. .. Executor and Administrator, 2 Doe d. Lawford v. Roe, 1 Bing. N. C. 161 Ejectment, 4

d. Shaw v. Steward, 3 N. & M. 372 .. .. Husband and Wife, 3

d. Smith v. Webber, 1 Ad. & E. 119 .. Ejectment, 1; Evidence, 2

d. Tucker v. Roe, 4 Moo. & S. 165 Ejectment, 3

Ducket v. Williams, 2 C. & M. 348 Insurance, 2

Eicke v. Nokes, 1 Bing. N. C. 69 Bankruptcy, 5

Elston v. Braddick, 2 C. & M. 435; 4 Tyr. 123 .. .. Bankruptcy, 4

Foster v. Taylor, 3 N. & M. 244 Illegal Contract

Fraser v. Swansea Canal Navigation Company, 3 N. Sc M. 391 Bankruptcy, 3;

Canal Act; Limitation of Action; Trover, 1 Freeman v. Paganini, 4 Moo. & S. 165 .. ..' ..' .. Bail, 1 Furnival v. Stringer, 1 Bing. N. C. 68 Venue, 2

Gale v. Capern, 1 Ad. & E. 103 Limitations, Statute of, 1

Gilbert v. Downs, 1 Biag. N. C. 173 Tithes

Gill, Exparte, 1 Bing. N. C. 168 Husband and Wife, 6

Governors of the Poor of Bristol v. Wait, 3 N. & M. 359 .. Poor Rate, 3

Hall v. Booth, 3 N. & M. 316 .. Arrest, 3

Hammond v. Hooley, 1 Bing. N. C. 31 .. .. .. Post-horse Duties

Hanbury v. Ella, 1 Ad. & E. 61; 3 N. & M. 438 .. .. Amendment, 1

Hatsall v. Griffith, 4 Tyr. 487 .. .. .. Money had and received, 4

Haworth v. Hardcastle, 1 Bing. N. C. 182 Partnership, 5

Hayslep v. Gymer, 1 Ad. & E. 162 Evidence, 3

Heydon v. Thompson, 1 Ad. & E. 210; 3 N. & M. 319 .. .. Pleading, 1

Home v. Took, 4 Moo. & S. 183 Practice, 5

Howell v. Bulteel, 2 C. & M. 339 Practice, 10

Huber v. Steiner, 4 Moo. & S. 328 Practice, 8

Humphreys v. Harvey, 1 Bing. N. C. 61 . Attorney, 4

Ireland v. Johnson, 1 Bing. N. C. 162 .. Distress

Irving v. Clegg, 1 Bing. N: C. 53 Charter-party, 2

In the matter of the London and Westminster Bank, 1 Bing. N. C. 197 . Practice, 3

Jackson v. Stopherd, 2 C. & M. 361 Partnership, 2

Jacobs v. Humphery, 2 C. & M. 413 .. '.. .. .. .. Sheriff

James v. Dods, 2 C. & M. 266; 4 Tyr. 101 Way, 1

Jesse v. Roy, 4 Tyr. 626 .. .. • • Shipping

Kensit v. Bulteel, 4 Tyr. 59 .. .. Practice, 10

King, Exp., 3 N. & M. 437 , ..' .. Attorney, 2

Kirwan v. Kirwan, 4 Tyr. 491 .. .. Partnership, 4

Knight v. Gibbs, 1 Ad. & E. 43 .. .. Slander, 1

Knowles v. Lynch, 4 Tyr. 477 Inferior Court

[ocr errors][merged small]

M'Andiew T. Adams, 1 Bing. N. C. 29 .. .. .. Charter-party, 1

Marsh v. Keating, (in the House of Lords,) 1 Bing. N. C. 198 .. Money had

and received, 2

Marston v. Downes, I Ad. &c E. 31.. Attorney, 1; Executor and Administrator, 1 Mayor of Lyme Regis v. Henley, 1 Bing. N. C. 222 .. .. Corporation

Meekin v. Whalley, 1 Bing. N. C. 59 "Attorney, 3

Megginson v. Harper, 2 C. & M. 322; 4 Tyr. 94 .. Limitations, Stat, of, 3 Moore v. Taylor, 1 Ad. & E. 25; 3 N. & M. 406 .. .. Insurance, 1

Neville v. Cooper, 2 C. & M. 329 Trespass, 2

Noy v. Reynolds, 1 Ad. & E. 159 .. .. Money had and received, I

Niblett v. Pottow, 1 Bing. N. C. 81 Turnpike Acts, 1

Northwaite v. Bennett, 2 C. & M. 316 Churchwarden, 1

Owen v. Burnett, 2 C. & M. 353; 4 Tyr. 133 Carriers' Act

Pepper v. Whalley, 1 Bing. N. C. 71 .. .. .. .. Process, 2

Pickford v. Davis, 1 Bing. N. C. 141 Turnpike Acts, 2

Pitt v. Coombs, 3 N. & M. 212 Arrest, 2

Plimmer v. Sells, 3 N. & M. 422 Husband and Wife, 2

Rees v. Morgan, 3 N. & M. 205 .. .. Uniformity of Process Act

Reid v. Lord Tenterden, 4 Tyr. Ill .. Executor and Administrator, 4

Rew v. Pettet, 1 Ad. & E. 196 .. .. .. Limitations, Statute of, 2

Rex v. Bloxam, 3 N. & M. 385 Sessions

v. Archdeacon of Chester, 3 N. & M. 413 .. .. Churchwarden, 2

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

v. Trustees of Cheadle Savings Bank, 3 N. & M. 418.. Savings Bank Act, 2

v. of the Witham Savings Bank, 3 N, & M, 416 .. Savings Bank

Act, 1

Richardson v. Gifford, 1 Ad. & E. 52; 3 N. & M. 325..Landlord and Tenant, 1

Ricketts v. "Lewis, 1 Ring. N. C. 196 .. Practice, 2

Roberts v. Wedderburne, 1 Bing. N. C. 4 .... .. .. Process, 1

[ocr errors][merged small]

Saffery v. Elgood, 1 Ad. & E. 191; 3 N. & M. 346 .. .. Rent Charge Sanderson v. Bell, 2 C. & M. 303, 304 .. .. Lien; Master and Servant

Shinfield v. Laxton, 4 Moo. & S. 187 Practice, 6

Shortrede v. Cheek, 1 Ad. & E. 57 .. Guarantee

Sibley v. Tomlins, 4 Tyr. 90 .. .. .. Slander, 2

Simons v. Farreu, 1 Bing. N. C. 126 .. •• •• •• •• Covenant

Simpson v. Pt-nton, 2 C. & M. 430 Frauds, Statute of, 2

Skipper v. Lane, 4 Moo. & S. 283 .. .. .. Interpleader Act

Solarte v. Palmer, (in the House of Lords,) 1 Bing. N. C. 194 ,. Bill of Exchange, 3

Sowerby v. Butcher, 2 C. & M. 368 Bill of Exchange, 4

Stephens v. Pejl, 4 Tyr. 6 .... .. Bankruptcy, 3

Strelton v. Busnaqh, 1 Bipg. N. C. 139 Husband and Wife, 5

Summers v. Moseley, 4 Tyr. 158 .. .. .. .. .. Arrest, 1

Summers v. Moseley, 4 Tyr. 158; and see Perry v. Gibson, 1 Ad. & Ed, 48,

Subpoena

Thorpe v. Eyre, 3 N. & M. 214 .... Insolvent Acts, 2; Landlord and Tenant, 3 Tremeere v. Morison, 1 Bing. N. C. 89 .. Executor and Administrator, 3

Trimbey v. Vignier, 1 Bing. N.C. 151 Bill of Exchange, 2

Turner v. Pye, 1 Ad. & E. 34; 3 N. & M. 354 Practice, 12

Wardroper v. Richardson, 1 Ad. & E. 75 .. .. Writ of Trial Act, 8

Whitbourne v. Pettifer, 4 Moo. & S. 182 Practice, 4

Wilkinson v. Byers, 1 Ad.& E. 106 Assumpsit

Wills v. Nurse, 1 Ad. & E. 65 .. .. .. .. Husband and Wife, 1

Williams v. Harris, 1 Bing. N. C. 13 Practice, 1

dem., Harris, ten., 4 Moo. & S. 358 .. .. .. Practice, 9

Winter v. Elliott, 1 Ad. & E. 24; 3 N. & M. 315 Prisoner

Woodin v. Burford, 2 C. & M. 391 .. .. Warranty

Woolway v. Rowe, 1 Ad. & E. 114 .. .. .. .. Evidence, 1

Wright v. Doe d. Tatham, (in the Exchequer Chamber,) 1 Ad. & E. 1. 3 N. & M.

268 ... , .. Will

Wright v. Walker, 4 Tyr. 502 .. ".. Way, 2

[ocr errors][merged small]
« AnteriorContinuar »