I will not here discuss the positive; That side is rather for myself and her Whom I watch daily, in whose face as yet I see no trace of turning back again From what, with her own will, she ventured on. The negative is rather what to you Will be most interesting, as indeed Your doubts all turn upon it. Firstly, then, (I cannot put the sermon from my pen ; It must have written sermons at some time ;) I grant the truth of Goëthe's axiom By taking Art to signify the path To God's infinity, and Science that To God's minuteness, which in very truth Is also infinite; I grant it true In this respect, as linked with principles, And not, as some would have it, linked with facts,— A daub on canvas, or a pin-spiked fly; In this respect, as linked with principles, 'Tis true indeed, and so magnificent As to deserve the name of revelation. Now let me trace my second parallel ; 'He who has love and honour wanteth not 'A form of marriage; he who lacketh them 'Let him have form,'-to bind him, who would else But treat his wife as if she were a whore, His children as the great unfathered throng Who crowd our workhouses and lawless streets. Let me be plain; there is not any man Who has not love and honour in some sort ; Though oft 'tis difficult to see wherein That love is raised above a brute's desire, But let us journey upward in the scale; Is not the daub on canvas, not the fact Which oft results, though not invariably, From their desire to draw more near to God, Through nearness to each other ;-nearness which Is very love, the entrance whereunto Is nakedness-is free acknowledgment Of all high thoughts, of all corrupting stains Beholds, and ofttimes uses as a thorn To prick the spirit from its sluggishness. And this is what we strive for, this is what We two have found and fain would show the world,― The union of two spirits, which includes Material union, and alone has power To lift the latter from that foul abyss Of animal passions which whole hosts of men Think, vainly, they escape from, when they turn To settle down, as well they call the state Which is to them the exhausted settling down Of sand but lately drifted in the whirl Of fierce cross-currents. Thus we would define Our love, and honour rises in the scale With love's ascension; all minutest forms Of speech, or act, or thought, are parts of that Is science; dealing rather with the fact All this is true, I hear you say; but then Exists in spite of social formalists ? What need? why, every need! Remember this, History will teach you if my words do not,— That action only is the lever which Has power to move the world; had Cæsar fallen If envy had been peevishly content To speak of daggers? Had the Tudor race Been blessed in its declining, had not he Who gave it all its greatness, first been cursed For setting up his individual will Against all custom and established law? Had Hampden been a hero, Washington, Or scores beside, if thoughts that burned in them And not burst forth into that cleansing fire Answer me this ;-in days when you were young,- Before a magistrate, for blows bestowed On guardians of the peace, or-(be advised!) Or walked on Sunday in a wide-awake Unto some fane (you best know which they are,) Its week-day sins? Your hesitation proves |