No. 16.

moustraunce, &c.-R. Thorpe. Moustretz coment W.2 A.D. 1345. est cosyn al Counte.-STON. Sil demandast par my luy il fra, mes ore nient.-R. Thorpe. Par lappropriacion est suppose qe ceo nest pas tenu du Roi, et vous dioms qe lavoweson est tenu du Roi; et desicome le Roi nestoit my appris, al temps del graunt, qe ceo fuit tenu de luy, et issint la suggestion faux, et le Roi desceu, jugement pur le Roi; et prioms 3 brief al Evesqe.-Grene. Et, desicome vostre title est qe lavoeson est amorti saunz conge du Roi, et le revers avoms moustre par record, jugement.Thorpe. Entretz le plee.-Grene nosa demurer, mes

No. 17.

A.D. 1345. abide judgment, but imparled, and then said that the advowson was held of William Philip, and not of the King; as of his Crown; ready, &c.-R. Thorpe. Held of the King; ready, &c.-Grene. Not held of the King, as of his Crown; ready, &c.-R. Thorpe. If you will confess that it is held of the King, but not as of his Crown, and will abide judgment whether the appropriation be not sufficiently good, we will answer to that, and will abide judgment without putting the facts to a jury; and if you will traverse in general terms to the effect that the advowson is not held in capite of the King, that is a different issue; and since you will do neither the one nor the other, we pray a writ to the Bishop.-STONORE to Grene. Do you imagine that by such a license from the King, in general terms, where he did not grant his own right, you will be able to debar the King from his presentation, on the ground that the advowson is not held of the King as of his Crown, but possibly by reason of some escheat? as meaning to say that he would not do so.-Grene. No, Sir, but it is sufficient for us to traverse his title as comprised in his count and his declaration. And afterwards they were at issue as to whether the advowson was held immediately of the King, or not, &c.-So note.

Ad terminum

qui præteriit.

(17.) § Entry ad terminum qui præteriit.-Sadelyng

No. 17.

enparla, et dit qe lavoeson est tenu de W. de1 P., A.D. 1345. et noun pas du Roi come de sa Coròun; prest, &c. -[R. Thorpe. Tenu du Roi; prest, &c.-Grene. Noun pas tenu du Roi come de sa Coroun; prest, &c.]2-R. Thorpe. Si vous volletz conustre qe cest tenu du Roi, mes noun pas come 3 de sa Coroun, et demurer en jugement si lappropriacion ne soit assetz bone, nous respoundroms a cella, et demuroms en jugement sanz enqueste; et si vous vollez traverser generalment qe lavoweson nest pas tenue en chief du Roi, cest autre issue; et de puis qe vous ne voilletz ne lun ne lautre nous prioms brief al Evesqe.-STON. a Grene. Quidetz vous par tiel licence du Roi general, ou il graunta pas son dreit demene, de forclore le Roi de son presentement, par tant qe ceo nest pas tenu du Roi come de sa Coroun, mes par cas par cause dasqun eschete? quasi diceret non. -Grene. Nanil, Sire, mes il nous suffit de traverser son title compris deinz son counte et sa moustrance. -Et puis ils furent a issue le quel il fuit tenu du Roi ou noun, simplement, &c.-Sic nota.

4

(17.) § Ad terminum qui præterit.-Sadl.

"nunc clamat præsentare, et quod [Fitz., prædictus Prior tenet prædictam Taile, 1.] "ecclesiam in proprios usus ut de

advocatione sua propria de præ

"dicto Willelmo Philip, consan

guineo et herede prædicti Petri, in puram et perpetuam eleemosynam, et non de domino Rege immediate, prout idem dominus "Rex in demonstratione

supponit."

6 The words -Sic nota" 66 are from H. alone. According to the record, the replication, upon which issue was joined, was “quod prædictus Prior "tenet advocationem prædictam “de domino Rege immediate, &c." A verdict was found at Nisi prius “quod ecclesia de Westbilneye est eadem ecclesia de

46

sua

Judgment was thereupon given : -" Ideo prædictus Priori eat inde "sine die, salvo jure Regis cum "alias, &c."

7 From L., H., and C.

A.D. 1345. stanes.

No. 17.

What have you to show the lease?-STONORE. Do you not say anything else?-Sadelyngstanes. Your ancestor, on whose seisin you bring the action, gave, by this deed, in frank-marriage to this same person with his daughter, and we are their issue; judgment whether you can have an action against us. And the deed, being read, was found to be in the form alleged, but to have and to hold for their lives. Seton. You see plainly that, according to the deed, in the Habendum et Tenendum clause, in which the nature of the gift is definitely declared, it is only a term for life, which term is passed according to their own confession; judgment, and we pray seisin.—Seton (continuing). When the intention of the donor is not definitely determined in the first clause, and it is definitely determined in the Habendum et Tenendum clause, you will adjudge the effect of the deed to be in accordance with the definite words, and not by the first words which are indefinite.-HILLARY. If I give to you and to your heirs by the Dedi clause, and for your life only by the Habendum et Tenendum clause, do you not have a fee simple? So also if I give to you and your wife in tail, or for term of life, to have and to hold to you alone for your life, will not the gift be such as the first clause purports ? as meaning to say that it will.-WILLOUGHBY. I saw Sir Ralph de Hengham give judgment, with regard to such deeds as have the clause of gift contrariant to the Habendum et Tenendum clause, in accordance with the purport of the first clause.-Stouford. It is all one deed and one livery; therefore the judgment must be in accordance with the whole deed.-Huse. When a gift is made conditional in the first clause without expressly determining what is the estate, and the intention of the donor is definitely declared in the subsequent Habendum et Tenendum clause, the deed will be judged in accordance with the definite determination, and not in accordance with that which is indefinite.-HILLARY. A gift in frank

avetz vous1 du lees ?-STON." Autre chose ne ditetz ? A.D. 1345. -Sadl. Vostre auncestre de qi seisine, &c., par ceo fait dona en fraunk mariage mesme celuy ove sa fille, entre quex nous sumes issue; jugement si vers nous accion poietz aver.-Et le fet lieu voleit qe le doun fuit par la manere, a aver et tener pur lour vies.-Setone. Vous veietz bien qe par le fet en la clause de habendum et tenendum, ou le doun est desclarre en certein, nest qe terme de vie, quele terme est passe de lour conissance; jugement et prioms seisine. Setone. Quant en la primere clause nest pas determine 4 la volunte le donour en certein, et en le habendum et tenendum il est determine en certeine, vous ajuggeretz le fet solone les paroles en certein, et noun pas par les primers qe sount en noun certein.-HILL. Si jeo doune a vous et a voz heirs par la clause de dedi, et par le habendum _ et tenendum forqe soulement a vostre vie, navetz fee simple? Auxint [si] jeo doune a Vous et vostre femme en taille, ou terme de vie, a aver et tener a vous soulement à vostre vie, ne serra le doun tiel com la primere clause purport? quasi diceret sic. -WILBY. Jeo vie 5 Sir Rauf de Ingham" ajuger tieles fetes qe furent contrariauntz en la clause del doun et del aver et tener solone purport de la primere clause.-Stouff. Tut est un fet et un livere; par quei il covient juger sur tut8 le fet.-Huse. Quant un doun est fait condicionel en la clause saunz expressement determiner quel estat, et en la clause subsequent de habendum et tenendum est desclarre en certein la volunte le donour, homme ajugera le fet solonc la determinacion en certein, et noun pas solone ceo qest en noun certein.-HILL.