venge,' the temporal accent can not be deprived of its supremacy, by a radical stress on the first syllable, except through an irksome effort of the organs in exploding the first, and abbreviating the last. For it is sometimes necessary to reduce the quantity of one syllable, in order that the radical stress may take the lead on another. The accent of the word 'Emanuel,' lies in the quantity of the second syllable. Scarcely any force of abruptness can transfer the accent to 'e,' whilst 'man' retains its length. When this is shortened, the first syllable 'e,' may, through a strong radical stress, be made the leading accent; but the word will scarcely be recognized in the change.

In regarding the circumstances of accent, it ought to be borne in mind that the difference in kind of the elementary sounds, may in some cases, be mistaken for a difference in force; since to many an ear, 'ee-l' and. a-le' might seem to be surpassed by 'ou-r' and 'a-we.'

It is also to be remarked, that there are different degrees of susceptibility among the elements, in receiving the accent. The tonics most easily and conspicuously take on each of its three modes. The abrupt elements assist the explosive effort of the tonics; but are utterly incapable of the loud concrete, and the temporal accent. The subtonics have little or no power, under the radical stress; but accomplish all the purposes of quantity whilst the atonics are feeble instruments of the accentual distinction, whether its aim be at time or stress.

The impressive agency of accent on the ear, is fixed by the orthoëpy of the English language, on one or two of the syllables of all words which have more than one. It is a great source of variety in speech; is the principal instrument of our versification; and when skilfully disposed, by the adjustment of a delicate ear, produces, with the assistance of quantity, the rythmus of harmonious prose.

Some grammarians and rhetoricians, with whom the intelligent Mr. Sheridan is to be ranked, have set forth a rule, that when the accent falls on a consonant, the syllable is short: and long when on a vowel. Whilst I was at school, I could not understand this great prosodial principle: now, I perceive it has no meaning. For if accent be variously produced by radical stress, the loud concrete, and by quantity, a distinction of literal place can not give the variety which the rule supposes.

:

The abrupt stress will always be made on a tonic (or vowel), notwithstanding the syllable may be opened on a preceding subtonic or abrupt element. The loud concrete must be made on all the elements of the syllable without distinction and the accentual impression by quantity must consist of the united time of tonics and subtonics, when the syllable is constructed with these different elements. But all this is only a denial of the truth of the rule, on the grounds of the phenomena of accent which have been pointed out in this section. Let us see how the principle corresponds with the fact of pronunciation. In the word 'action,' the abrupt stress is on a vowel, (tonic) and yet the syllable is short: and in the word 'revenge,' the greatest impression is from the quantity of the subtonics (consonants,) and yet the syllable is long. Language is full of like examples; and from the illustration they furnish of the nature of accent, we may learn that the time of syllables bears no certain relation to stress, nor other modes of the accentual agency. The prevalent error on this subject must be ascribed to the general cause of all errors,-The want of observation at first, and the assumption of notions to prevent observation ever after.

Mr. Walker has given a theory of accent, in which he makes it dependent on the rising and falling inflection, as indefinitely described by him. If the preceding history of intonation is true, and if it has been clearly comprehended, the reader must at once conclude that accent can have no fixed relationship to a rise of the voice or to its fall: for it may be made with every essential characteristic under either of these opposite movements; their junction into the wave; and under all the changeable phrases of melody.

Much has been said by authors on the subject of accent. But I began this analysis of the human voice, with a resolution to speak after nature; not after men.

2 L

SECTION XLV.

Of Emphasis.

THAT function which Rhetoricians call Emphasis, is defined to be a stress of voice on one or more words of a sentence, distinguishing them by intensity or peculiarity of meaning. Some writers, without seeming to care much about the point, indefinitely attribute to emphasis, a characteristic intonation: and Mr. Walker imagined he specified his idea of 'tone' throughout all its conditions, when he made an erroneous application of the upward and downward inflection.

But authority aside; let us try to do something to the purpose, by observing the thing.

It was stated that accent is the fixed but inexpressive distinction of syllables by quantity and stress: alike both in place and nature, whether the words are pronounced singly from the columns of a vocabulary, or connectedly in the series of dis

course.

Emphasis may be defined to be the-expressive but occasional distinction of a syllable, and consequently of the whole word, by one or more of the specific modes of Time, Quality, Force and Pitch.

This notable function belongs essentially to the current of discourse; but it may be employed on solitary interjections, and on single words which stand as elliptical sentences. It will appear hereafter, that emphasis is no more than a generic term, including the specification of the uses of every accident of the voice for the purpose of enforcing sentiment and thought.

The conditions of sound which constitute accent, being included among the enumerated causes of emphatic distinction, it may be inferred, that in these particulars, accent and emphasis can not differ from each other. The quantity, radical stress, and loud concrete, employed as the means of emphasis, have indeed the same elemental nature, as in accentual agency, but their purposes in the former case invest them with that expression which constitutes the characteristic of emphasis.

For a detailed account of the particular occasions of emphasis the reader is referred to libraries. They contain many rhetorical works, setting forth this part of the subject, with comprehensiveness, perspicuity and taste. It is the aim of this essay rather to point out and to measure the vocal material of emphasis.

Emphasis as was stated above, produces its effect upon the ear, by means of the quality and time of sound, the modes of stress, and the varied intervals of intonation. The particular enumeration of these means will be given under the following heads.

Of the Radical Emphasis.

WHEN an immutable syllable bears the accent of a word which is remarkable by sense, sentiment or antithesis, the audible distinction can be made only in three ways: by quality of voice; a wide change in the phrase of melody; and the abrupt enforcement of the radical stress. The two former modes of emphasis on short syllables, will be noticed in their proper places. The last is here illustrated.

And with perpetual inroads to alarm,
Though inaccessible, his fatal throne;
Which, if not victory, is yet revenge.

If the strongly contrasted feature of the word 'victory,' is not represented by guttural emphasis; or by aspiration, or some other available quality; or if it does not receive the peculiar coloring, effected by a change of radical pitch upward or downward through the skip of a third, fifth, or octave-If, I say, these are not used, the syllable' vic' must be raised into importance. by means of the sharp radical stress: at least no other can be operative whilst the syllable is limited to its natural quantity.

It is true, even an immutable time, as formerly said, may be carried rapidly through any interval of the scale; still if this rapid movement is not joined with the radical change, it does not deserve to be taken into account in this case.

Although the radical distinction is here spoken of as appli

cable to immutable syllables: it is plain from its nature, that it may be laid on those of indefinite time. But since these admit of the more agreeable modes derived from intonation, they less frequently require the strong explosion of the radical.

This emphasis is the symbol of sentiments of anger, violence, and energy of all kinds; and is the common mode of enforcement, whatever is the time of the syllable, when the spirit of discourse directs a rapid utterance.

Of the Median Emphasis.

THE prominent display of the sense of a word, by a gradual increase and subsequent diminution of voice, can be effected only on syllables of indefinite time. It gives an importance equal to that of the radical stress, but it exhibits the element of force in an aspect of greater smoothness, dignity and grace. In the following sentence, the word 'sole' contains a sentiment of warm and serious admiration, which is finely set forth by means of this emphasis.

Wonder not sov'reign Mistress, if perhaps
Thou canst, who art sole wonder!

Though the median mode of force might be executed on the simple rise and fall of intervals, when considerably protracted, yet it is most frequently made on the wave. In the present case the intonation of the word 'sole' is through the wave of the second; the swell being at the junction of its two constituents.

The reader must bear in mind, that in assigning the mode of stress to this and the preceding examples, I have been governed by the principles of speech laid down in this volume; and shall continue to apply them in illustrating all the other forms of emphasis included under this section: for if these examples be read in any of those various ways which result from spontaneous attempts in elocution, I shall in all probability be misunderstood. On this ground I would allot to the lines above quoted, that plain but deeply respectful character which belongs to the utterance of protracted quan