...contemplated by PoliticalEconomy. This view does not essentially differ from that of A. Smith ; since in this science the term wealth is limited to exchangeable...of exchange. But for this very reason it is perhaps more convenient to describe Political-Economy as the science of Exchanges, rather than as the science...

...contemplated by Political Economy. This view does not essentially differ from that of A. Smith; siuce, in this science, the term wealth is limited to exchangeable...exchange. But for this very reason, it is, perhaps, more convenient to describe Political Economy as the science of Exchanges, rather than as the science...

...contemplated by Political Economy. This view does not essentially differ from that of A. Smith; since, in this science, the term wealth is limited to exchangeable...exchange. But for this very reason, it is, perhaps, more convenient to describe Political Economy as the science of Exchanges, rather than as the science...

...contemplated by Political-Economy. This view does not essentially differ from that of A. Smith; since in this science the term Wealth is limited to exchangeable...of exchange. But for this very reason it is perhaps In what * ... sense Politi- the more convenient to describe Political-Economy cal.Economy as the science...

...contemplated by Political-Economy. This view does not essentially differ from that of A. Smith; since in this science the term Wealth is limited to exchangeable...of exchange. But for this very reason it is perhaps sense Politi- * ne more convenient to describe Pohtical-Ecocal-Economy nomy as the science of Exchanges,...

...contemplated by Political Economy. This view does not essentially differ from that of A. Smith ; since in this science the term Wealth is limited to Exchangeable...forth only as they are, or are designed to be, the subject of exchange. But for this reason it is perhaps the more convenient to describe Political Economy...

...who says, after showing that Political Economy only treats of tilings so far as regards their being subjects of exchange — " But for this very reason...perhaps the more convenient to describe Political Econonry as the science of exchanges, rather than as the science of national wealth." And he proposed...

...contemplated in Political Economy. This view does not essentially differ from that of A. Smith ; since in this science the term Wealth is limited to Exchangeable...forth only as they are, or are designed to be, the subject of exchange. But for this reason, it is perhaps the more convenient to describe Political Economy...

...of them so far forth only as they are, or are designed to be, the subject of exchange. But for this reason, it is perhaps the more convenient to describe Political Economy as the Science of Exchanges, rather than as the Science of national wealth. For the things themselves of which the science treats...

...indicated by our quotation from Mr MacLeod, ' does not essentially differ from that of Adam Smith ; since in this science the term wealth is limited to exchangeable...are or are designed to be the subjects of exchange ' (p. 6). ' This limitation of the term Wealth to things contemplated as exchangeable has been objected...