Imagens das páginas
[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

if he were a mere man, But

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

(5) That our Lord with the Holy Spirit is not excluded from the unity of the Godhead by the text, is evident to those who take notice that the Apostle hath no sooner mentioned one God the Father, but he mentions the Son as the one Lord,

in the unity of the Father and of the Spirit. (6) If you infist that this expression si, See; o N E God, which is applied to the Father, necessarily excludes the Son ; it will follow by the same unscriptural rule, that this expression st; Kveto; on E Lord, which is applied to the Son, necessarily excludes the Father, and thus to rob the SoN of his supreme Divinity, you will rob the FATHER himself of his supreme Lordships So true it is that unitarian overdoing, , always ends in undoing ; and that our Saviour spake an awful Truth, when he said, He that honoureth not

the Son, honoureth not the Fatner / (7) To be convinced that the one God, and the one Lord are not to be separated, and that while the former is viewed as . Creator, the latter is not to be looked upon as a mere creature, we have only to confider what the Apostle faith of each. He calls the Father the Being of whom are all things, and we in Him: And he assures us that the Son is the Being, by whom are all things, and we by Him. Now if all things are by the Son, he is prior to all the Creatures that have been created, may he is the Creator of them all, and therefore you endeavour to substitute an absurd tenet to the second article of the Christian faith, when you teach that he is a mere man, who had no existence till he was born of the Virgin. Thus the very Scriptures, by which you attack our Lord's Divinity, when they are candidly considered with the context, and the tenor df the Bible, strongly confirm what you rashly . . deny:

[ocr errors]
« AnteriorContinuar »