 | Seyom Brown - 2004 - 220 páginas
...superiority of the United States. Traditional concepts of deterrence will not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction...and whose most potent protection is statelessness. The overlap between states that sponsor terror and those that pursue WMD compels us to action. For... | |
 | Frank H. Columbus - 2003 - 92 páginas
...superiority of the United States. • Traditional concepts of deterrence will not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction...and whose most potent protection is statelessness. The overlap between states that sponsor terror and those that pursue WMD compels us to action. For... | |
 | Ivo H. Daalder, James M. Lindsay - 2003 - 286 páginas
...people, and the wealth of their nations." And, of course, "deterrence will not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction and the targeting of innocents." This is why America might have to act preemptively, the strategy stated. "The United States has long... | |
 | Robert Patterson - 2004 - 280 páginas
...superiority of the United States. • Traditional concepts of deterrence will not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction...and whose most potent protection is statelessness. The overlap between states that sponsor terror and those that pursue WMD compels us to action. For... | |
 | Brian Loveman - 2004 - 388 páginas
...rejected Cold War.v.vi7 Introduction era deterrence because it would "not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction...and whose most potent protection is statelessness" (2002: 15). According to the White House, "proactive counter-proliferation" and preemptive actions... | |
 | Dominic McGoldrick - 2004 - 396 páginas
...superiority of the United States. Traditional concepts of deterrence will not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction...and whose most potent protection is statelessness. The overlap between states that sponsor terror and those that pursue WMD compels us to action. For... | |
 | David Held, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi - 2004 - 312 páginas
...the lesson of September 1 1 : "Traditional concepts of deterrence will not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction...martyrdom in death and whose most potent protection is statelessness."32 Hence, the United States reserves the right to act preemptively, using the tools... | |
 | Benjamin R. Barber - 2003 - 242 páginas
...more willing to take risks . . . traditional concepts of deterrence will not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction...martyrdom in death and whose most potent protection is statelessness."4 Yet the new doctrine ends up reproducing some of containments most perilous features.... | |
 | Robert Garran - 2014 - 244 páginas
...deterrence will not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction 128 and the targeting of innocents; whose so-called soldiers...and whose most potent protection is statelessness. The overlap between states that sponsor terror and those that pursue weapons of mass destruction compels... | |
 | Moritz Bassler, Ewout van der Knaap - 2004 - 308 páginas
...bleibt aber auch das Ideal des „Traditional concepts of deterrence will not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction and the targeting of innocents; whose so-callcd soldiers scck martyrdom in death and whose most potent protection ist statelessness." NSS,... | |
| |
Traditional concepts of deterrence will not work against a terrorist enemy whose avowed tactics are wanton destruction and the targeting of innocents; whose so-called soldiers seek martyrdom in death and whose most potent protection is statelessness. 
