 | Samuel Owen - 1849 - 404 páginas
...or quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or symbol which, from the nature of the fact which it is used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ, for the same purpose. Were such an appropriation to be sanctioned by an injunction, the action... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1872 - 640 páginas
...as a trade mark, a sign or symbol, which, from the nature of the fact which it is used to represent, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ, for the same purpose. Farina v. Silvcrlock, 39 Eng. Law and Eq. 514, and Amoskeag Manufac.... | |
 | Joseph S. Bosworth, New York (State). Superior Court (New York) - 1863 - 740 páginas
...ownership of the goods, and are only meant to indicate their quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or symbol which from the nature of the fact it is meant to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for... | |
 | Charles Richards Brown - 1871 - 426 páginas
...wrongs by which the patrons are unwittingly deviated. The complainant has 110 right to appropriate a sign or symbol which from the nature of the fact it is m .ant to signify, others may emyloy with equal truth for the same purpose. 2 Sumlf. R., 599. Names... | |
 | 1871 - 874 páginas
...Daly, 7 Bosw. 222 ; Binninger v. Wattles, 28 How. Pr. 206. A party cannot appropriate as a trademark a sign or symbol, which, from the nature of the fact it is intended to represent, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1872 - 1546 páginas
...goods, but are only meant to indicate their names or quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or a symbol, which, from the nature of the fact it is used...equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose."* And it is obvious that the same reasons which forbid the exclusive appropriation... | |
 | Abraham Lansing - 1873 - 634 páginas
...name or quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or symbol from the nature of the fact which it is used to signify others may employ with equal truth, and, therefore, have an equal right to employ for the same purpose. It will be seen from the foregoing extracts that a party has the right... | |
 | Charles Sidney Whitman - 1875 - 814 páginas
...goods, but are only meant to indicate their names or quality. He has no right to appropriate a sign or a symbol, which, from the nature of the fact it is used...equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose. Vide Wolfe v. Goulard, 18 Howard's Practice Reports, 64; Fctridgev. Wells,... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (4th Circuit) - 1877 - 684 páginas
...their name or quality. No one can appropriate a sign or symbol which, from the nature of the fact which it is used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose." This case has been recognized and followed in numerous cases ever since... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1877 - 678 páginas
...deceive or mislead the public. [ JF Imbs, 194. 13. A person has no right to appropriate a sign or a symbol which, from the nature of the fact it is used to signify, others may employ with equal trnth, and, therefore, have an equal right to employ for the same purpose. [Pratt and Farmer, 244.... | |
| |
He has no right to appropriate a sign or a symbol, which, from the nature of the fact it is used to signify, others may employ with equal truth, and therefore have an equal right to employ for the same purpose... 
