« AnteriorContinuar »
CA SE S
ARGUED AND ADJUDGED
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.
FEBRUARY TERM, 1815.
BY WILLIAM CRANCH,
TITS IGNORATIO JURIS LITIGIOSA EST, QUAM SCIENTIA.
C'C DE LEGIBI'S DIAL I.
PRINTED BY DANIEL RAPINE,
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, TO WIT:
BE IT REVIEWBERED, That on the 10th day of February, in the forty-first year of the Independence of the United States of America, William Cranch, of the said "listrict, hath deposited in this office, the title of a book, the right whereof be claims as author, in the words following, to wit:
Reports of Cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States “in February term, 1815 Vol. IX. "By WILLIAM CRANCH, Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of the district of Columbia. Potius ignoratio juris litigiosa est, quan scientia
“Cic. de legibus, dial. i.”
In conformity to the act of the Congress of the United States, intituled “ An aot for the encouragement o learning, by securing the copies of maps, charts and books; to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned.”
REPRINTED IN TAIWAN
Page 35 last line, for in,' road on.
77 line 10, for 'exception,' read execution.
179, after the 'vord needle,' in the las. line, erase the period, insert a comwa, and add the following words, viz:-making allowance for variation according to practical observation. Page 205 line 6, for • Circuit,' read District.
263 16, erase' when.'
476 10, for • Morris, Nicholson & Greenleaf,' read Morris & Nicholson. Page 480 line 24, for • That,' read The.
484 5, for interest,' read interests.
12, for acknowledges,' read acknowledge.
3, for • This,' read His. The following errata, in the opinion of CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL, in the case of the Venus, in volume 8, escaped notice until it was too late te correct them in the table of errata of that volume, viz ; Page 298 line 37, for "faces,' read parts
311 20, for permanent, read prominent.
Adeline, sch. and cargo, 244 Fanny's cargo, U. S. v.
181 Arnold v. U. S. 104 Finley v Williams et al
164 Frances, The
G: Barber, U. S. v
243 Blas Moran, brig Alerta v. 359 Gettings v. Burck's administratrix, Brip Alerta v. Blas Moran, 359
372 Brig Ann, 289 Giles et al. U. S. v.
212 Brig Concord 387 Grotjus, The
368 Brig Short Staple v. U. S. 55 Guthrie et al. Simms v.
19 Brig Struggle, v. U. S.
71 Bryan & Woodcock, U. S. v. 374
H. Burch's administratrix, Gettings v. 372 Hannay, Owens v.
180 Hazard's cargo v. Campbell 205 C.
199 Clark's executors v. Van Rieinsdyk,
Law & Campbell, Pratt v. 456
Lewis's lessee v. M:Farland 151 Donaldson, Randolp!ı v.
76 Drummond's Administrators v. Ma
M. gruder's trustees,
122 Dunham and Randolph's claim, 183 Magruder's trustees, Drummond's
Mandeville v: Union Bank, 9
126 Evans r. Jordan et al.
1.99 M.Clung's lessee, Meigs et nl. v. 11