Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub

ing out the words " fourth Monday of November,” and inserting the words “fifth Monday of November," in lieu thereof.

And the question having been put on said amendment, It was decided in the affirmative.

The question then recurred on the adoption of the original amendment of the committee as amended by the house ;

And having been put,
It was decided in the affirmative.
And the ayes and noes having been called for,
Those who voted in the affirmative were,

Messrs. Babcock, Botkin, Burns, Cass, Drake, Gardner, Hanrahan, Kinney, Martin, Mooers, Newell, Patch, Reed, Stewart, Virgin, Walworth, Williston, and Walker, (Speaker, 18.

Those who voted in the negative were,

Messrs. Burt, Cothren, Featherstonbaugh, Gibson, Holliday, Jackson, Pole, and Wakeley,–8.

Mr. Stewart then moved that said bill, together with the amendments, be re-committed to a committee of the whole house ;

Which was disagreed to. And the question having been put on the adoption of the second amendment of the committee to said bill, which was as follows, to wit:

" To add to the end of the first section the words, and all legal voters resident upon Indian territory, shall, under the qualifications prescribed by this act, have the right to vote for delegates in the counties ncarest to their residence,''

It was decided in the affirmative.

The question was then put on the adoption of the third amendment of the committee to said bill, which was

" To strike out all after the word 'convention,' in the second line of the second section of said bill, and insert the words "for the county in which he resides ;"

And was decided in the affirmative.
And the ayes and noes having been called for,
Those wbo voted in the affirmative were,

Alessrs. Babcock, Botkin, Burns, Cass, Cothren, Drake, Featherstonhaugh, Gardner, Gibson, Hanrahan, Jackson, Kinney, Martin, Mooers, Newell, Patch, Pole, Reed, Stewart, Wakeley, Walworth, and Walker, (Speaker,)-22.

Those who voted in the negative were,
Messrs. Burt, Holliday, Virgin, and Williston,-1.

The question then being on the adoption of the fourth amendment to said bill, which was

"To strike out all of section three, after the words “as follows, to wit,' and insert the folJowing:

3. In the county of Brown, one delegate. 4. In the county of Calumet, one delegate. 5. In the county of Chippewa, one delegate. 6. In the county of Columbia one delegate. 7. In the county of Crawford, one delegate. 8. In the county of Dane, four delegates. 9. In the county of Dodge, four delegates. 10. In the county of Fond du Lac, three delegates. 11. In the county of Grant, six delegates. 12. In the county of Green, two delegates. 13. In the county of Iowa, three delegates. 14. In the county of Jefferson, four delegates. 15. In the county of La Fayette, three delegates. 16. In the county of La Pointe, one delegate. 17. In the county of Manitouwoc, one delegate. 18. In the county of Marquette, one delegate. 19. In the county of Milwaukee, eight delegates. 20. In the county of Portage, one delegate. 21. In the county of Racine, nine delegates. 22. In the county of Richland, one delegate. 23. In the county of Rock, seven delegates. 24. In the county of Sauk, one delegate. 25. In the county of Sheboygan, one delegate. 26. In the county of St. Croix,, one delegate. 27. In the county of Walworth, seven delegates. 28. In the county of Washington, four delegates. 29. In the county of Waukesha, seven delegates. 30. In the county of Winnebago, one delegate,

Mr. Gibson moved to amend said amendment by striking out the word “one,” in the 3d line of section 3, and inserie ing in lieu thereof the word

"two Which was disagreed to. Mr. Martin moved to amend the amendment of the committee io said bill, as follows:

“Strike out all after the word be,' in the 2d line of section 3, and insert in lieu thereof the words, apportioned in the following manner, to wit: One delegate for each member of the house of representatives, and two for each member of the council, to be apportioned in the same way as members of our present legislature.'"

And the question having been put on the amendment,
It was decided in the negative.
And the ayes and noes having been called for;
Those who voted in the affirmative

Were,
Messrs. Burt, Cass, and Martin,-3.
Those who voted in the negative were,

Messrs. Babcock, Botkin, Burns, Cothren, Drake, Featherstonhaugh, Gardner, Gibson, Hanrahan, Holliday, Jackson, Kinney, Mooers, Newell, Patch, Pole, Reed, Stewart, Virgin, Wakeley, Walworth, Williston, and Walker, (Speaker,)-23.

Mr. Gardner moved to annend the fourth amendment of the committee to said bill, as follows, to wit :

* Strike out all after the first line in section 3d, and insert as follows: Brown,..

1 Calumet,

1 Columbia,

1 Chippewa, .

1 Crawford,

1

3 Dodge,

3 Fond du Lac,

2 Grant,

6 Green,

2 Iowa,

3

Dane,

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Richland,...

1 La Pointe, .

1 Manitouwoc,

1 Marquette, ...

1 Milwaukee,

7 Portage, .....

1 Racine,

8 Rock,

6 Sauk,

1 Sheboygan,

1 St. Croix,

1 Walworth,..

6 Washington,

3 Waukesha,

6 Winnebago,

1 La Fayette,

3 Jefferson,

3" And the question having been put on the said amendment,

It was disagreed to, The question then recurred on the adoption of the fourth amendment of the committee to said bill,

And having been put,
It was decided in the negative.
And the ages and noes having been called for,
Those who voted in the affirmative were,

Messrs. Cass, Cothren, Drake, Featherstonbaugh, Gibson, Hanrahan, Kinney, Newell, Patch, Reed, Wakeley, Walworth, and Walker, (Speaker,)—13.

Those who voted in the negative were,

Messrs. Babcock, Botkin, Burns, Burt, Gardner, Holliday, Jackson, Martin, Mooers, Pole, Stewart, Virgin, and Williston,-13.

The question having been put on the adoption of the fifth amendment of the committee to said bill, which was

“ To strike out all after and including the word provided,' in the 13th line of section 3, to the word 'Crawford,' in the 32d line;"

It was decided in the negative.

[ocr errors]

And a division having been called for,
There were 2 in the affirmative and 12 in the negative.

The question having been put on the adoption of the sixth amendment of the committee to said bill, which was

" To insert after the word 'county,' in the 17th line of section 4, the following, to wit: 'except that the returns of the county of Richland shall be transmitted to the county of Iowa;'"

It was decided in the affirmative.

And the question having been put on the adoption of the seventh amendment, which was

To strike out the word “fourth," in the third line of section five, and insert the word “third."

It was decided in the affirmative.

The question having been put on the adoption of the 8th amendment, which was

To insert after the word “ assembled,” in the fifth line of section five, the words “shall take the following oath or af. firmation, (as the case may be,) that I will faithfully and impartially assist in forming a constitution to the best of my abilities, and in accordance with the constitution of the United States, and"

It was decided in the affirmative.

The question having been put on the adoption of the ninth amendment, which was

To add to section six of said bill the following: " and shall adopt rules for the regulation of its members and officers, and have full power to enforce the same.”

It was decided in the affirmative.

The question having been put on the adoption of the tenth amendment, which was

To strike out the words “three dollars,” in the first line of section seventh, and insert the words “two bils," in lieu thereof.

It was decided in the negative.

The question having been put on the adoption of the elev. enth amendment, which was

To insert after the word "paper" in the seventh line of

« AnteriorContinuar »