CORRECTIONS. Page 86, note 2, for "Crompton "read" Compton." 115, margin, after "Dowere" add "[Fitz., Jugement, 176.]” 118, line 27, for "ession" read "essoin." 251, notes, col. 2, line 3, for “ judicum” read “judicium.” 307, note 2, for "Lincolniensii” read “Lincolniensis." 334, note 1, for "and 5" read “and 4.” 392, line 25, for "seised" read "seized." 394, line 5, for “seised” read ‘seized.” 419, note 4, for "116" read "100." 492, line 22, for “a "read"the"; and for "had" read “had not." 493, line 18, for "par" read" pas." 521, note 1, line 17, for "prædicta" read "prædictæ." 573, note 2, line 7, for "armi" read "arinis." ,, 593, col. 1, line 10, for “64” read “66.” 627, col. 2, line 26, for "de" read "le." In the volume next preceding (Easter-Michaelmas, HILARY TERM IN THE TWENTIETH YEAR OF THE A.D. 1345-6 clamat. No. 1. (1.) § A Quid juris clamat was sued against two Quid juris persons.-Thorpe, for one of them, said that she had nothing then, and had nothing on the day of the note of the fine. And as to the other he said that the person who was named with him in the writ was seised of the same tenements before the day of the note, and was so seised by virtue of a gift made to her and her husband in frankmarriage, and that her husband died without issue, and that she leased her estate to him, and he said by way of protestation, in order to save his estate, that the donor had released all right to him, and (said Thorpe) we do not understand that upon such a note he shall be put to claim.-Moubray. His plea is double, one that one of the persons named in the writ has nothing, the other that the other person named claims the fee.-Thorpe. As to the claim of the fee, we do not use that by way of answer, but inasmuch as the note supposes that the two held for their lives on the day of the note, we falsify that supposition by showing that one of them had nothing.-Seton. And, inasmuch as you take that for your plea, it seems that you say nothing on behalf of the one who is tenant as a reason why he ought not to attorn; for, in former times, when a tenant for term of life leased his estate to another by fine, the reversion was granted after the death of both, and so, though the reversion be granted after the death of both, DE TERMINO HILLARII ANNO REGNI REGIS No. 1. A.D. 1345-6. Quid juris (1.) § Quid juris clamat suy vers deux.-Thorpe, pur lun, dit qil navoit riens, ne avoit jour de la note, &c. Et quant al autre il dit qe celuy qe fuit clamat. nome ovesqe luy fuit seisi de mesmes les tenements [Fitz., Quid juris devant la note, et ceo par doun fait a luy et son clamat, 30.] baroun en frank mariage, et son baroun murust5 saunz issue, et ele lessa son estat a luy, et, pur protestacion, de soun estat sauver, dit qe le donour avoit relesse a luy tut son dreit, et nentendoms pas qe sur tiel note 6 il serra 7 mys de clamer.-Moubray. Son plee est double, un qe lun des nomes nad riens, autre qe lautre cleyme fee.-Thorpe. Quant a clamer de fee, nous lusoms pas 9 pur respons, mes de ceo qe la 10 note suppose qe les deux tiendrount a lour vies jour de la note, cella fauxoms nous par tant qe lun navoit rienz.-Setone. Et puis qe vous pernetz cella pur le plee, si semble il qe vous 11 ditetz rienz pur celuy qest tenant pur quey il ne 12 deit attourner; qar, devant ces houres, ou tenant a terme de vie lessa soun estat a autre par fyne, homme graunta la reversion apres le decees de touz deux, et auxint, tut soit reversion graunte apres le decees de deux, 8 |