THE ADVANTAGES OF KNOWLEDGE TO THE LOWER CLASSES

Advertisement.

Sermon.

AN ADDRESS TO THE REV. EUSTACE CAREY, ON HIS DESIGNA-

TION AS A CHRISTIAN MISSIONARY TO INDIA.

157

A SERMON ON THE DEATH OF HER ROYAL HIGHNESS THE

PRINCESS CHARLOTTE OF WALES

A FUNERAL SERMON FOR THE REV. DR. RYLAND

177

203

ON THE SUBSTITUTION OF THE INNOCENT FOR THE GUILTY.

Note by the Editor

261

263

The Argument from the Order of Time in which Baptism

and the Lord's Supper are supposed to have been instituted 293

SECTION IL

The Argument for Strict Communion from the Order of

Words in the Apostolic Commission, considered . . 304

SECTION III.

The Argument from Apostolical Precedent, and from the dif-

ferent Significations of the two Institutions, considered . 309

The Positive Grounds on which we justify the Practice of

Mixed Communion

SECTION I.

Free Communion urged, from the Obligation of Brotherly

Love.

316

321

321

SECTION II.

The Practice of Open Communion argued, from the express

Injunction of Scripture respecting the Conduct to be main-

tained by sincere Christians who differ in their Religious

Sentiments

SECTION III.

Pedobaptists a Part of the true Church, and their Exclusion

on that account unlawful

SECTION IV.

The Exclusion of Pedobaptists from the Lord's Table con-

sidered as a Punishment.

SECTION V.

On the Impossibility of reducing the Practice of Strict Com-

munion to any general Principle

SECTION VI.

344

The Impolicy of the Practice of Strict Communion considered 351

POSTSCRIPT

360

ON THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIAN BAPTISM

AND THE BAPTISM OF JOHN

363

Preface.

365

A REPLY TO THE REV. JOSEPH KINGHORN, BEING A FURTHER

VINDICATION OF THE PRACTICE OF FREE COMMUNION

391

The Fundamental Position; or, the supposed necessary

Connexion between the two positive Institutes of Chris-

tianity examined

CHAPTER I.

. . 401

Remarks on Mr. Kinghorn's Statement of the Controversy

CHAPTER II.

His Attempt to establish the Connexion contended for from

the Apostolic Commission and Primitive Precedent

401

406

CHAPTER III.

The supposed necessary Connexion between the two posi-

tive Institutes further discussed, wherein other Arguments

are examined

423

The Charge of dispensing with a Christian Ordinance con-

sidered

Page

436

436

CHAPTER V.

An Inquiry how far the Practice of Mixed Communion af-

fects the Grounds of Dissent from the Church of England

and from the Church of Rome.

CHAPTER VI.

The Propriety of appealing, in this Controversy, to the pe-

culiar Principles of the Pedobaptists, briefly examined

and discussed

PART III.

In which the Insufficiency of the Reply Mr. Kinghorn has

made to the principal Arguments urged for Mixed Com-

munion is exposed

CHAPTER VII.

His Reply to the Argument deduced from the Scriptural

Injunction of Mutual Forbearance and Brotherly Love,

considered

CHAPTER VIII.

On the Argument for Mixed Communion founded on the

Pedobaptists being a part of the true Church

CHAPTER IX.

The Injustice of the Exclusion of other Denominations con-

sidered as a Punishment.

CHAPTER X.

443

452

457

457

470

On the Contrariety of the Maxims and Sentiments of the

Advocates of Strict Communion to those which prevailed

in the early Ages; in which the Innovation imputed to

them by the Author is vindicated from the Charge of

Misrepresentation.

MODERN INFIDELITY CONSIDERED, WITH RESPECT TO ITS

INFLUENCE ON SOCIETY:

IN

A SERMON

PREACHED AT

THE BAPTIST MEETING, CAMBRIDGE.

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.-St. Paul.

Sunt qui in fortunæ jam casibus, omnia ponant,

Et nullo credant mundum rectore moveri,

Natura volvente vices et lucis, et anni;

Atque ideo intrepidi quæcunque altaria tangunt.-Juv.