« AnteriorContinuar »
remarkable about Becket's cross was the fact that he should bring it into the Council Chamber; but, as I understand the matter, the thing that provoked comment was that St. Thomas carried his own cross, instead of letting it be borne by a cross-bearer. This seems obvious from the whole account in William FitzStephen, and especially from the words thus translated in St. Thomas of Canterbury' (in the "English History from Contemporary Writers " Series), p. 75 :—
(1) by the insertion after the name of each figure of a reference to the page of the text on which the subject is described, and (2) by the addition at the bottom of each (to the deft) of the volume and the number of the plates therein printed, as well as (to the right) of the number of the plate in consecutive series (1 to 261), while the references found in the ordinary copies, which are at the top of the plate, are effaced. Changes like these must have been expensive in so long a series, and it can hardly be supposed that this is "The bishop of London recommended him to give the only copy in existence which shows his cross to one of his clerks, and said he looked as them. The matter is of some little interest though he were prepared to disturb the whole realm. to ornithologists, and I would invite any-You carry,' said the bishop of London, the cross body having access to a copy of this work in your hands. If only the king should take his sword, behold! a king bravely adorned and an -and copies are not very uncommon-to archbishop in like sort."" examine it and kindly to let me know the As is well known, an archbishop never takes result. I may add that the plates in Dr. his cross into his own hands: it is always Bureau's copy, which he obtained from the library of the late Prof. Alphonse Milne- the recent masterly revival of Becket' at This point was lost in Edwards, have never been folded, as is the Drury Lane, when Roger of York came in case with all others that I have seen, but with his cross in his hands. retain their original folio form-42 by 31 mm. ALFRED NEWTON.
Magdalene College, Cambridge.
LORD NELSON AND CARDINAL YORK.
(1) Lord Nelson gave a silver-mounted dirk to Lieut. Suckling (a cousin), who had served with him on board the Agamemnon.
(2) There is in existence a print of the interior of St. Peter's, which belonged to Cardinal York, and on the back is some writing, in which Lord Nelson's name, Charles Edward's, and the word dirk are decipherable. (3) The Agamemnon was in commission from 1794 to 1796. It does not appear that Cardinal York was driven from home and in distress till 1798.
A story copied from some review relates that Nelson rescued the cardinal, had him for seven weeks on board his ship, during which he saw some fighting; that he landed him on Austrian territory; that the cardinal afterwards visited the ship, thanked the admiral, officers, and crew as his deliverers, and gave Nelson a silver-mounted dirk and cane, which the cardinal valued much, as having belonged to his brother, Charles Edward.
From the facts given above it seems impossible that this could have happened on board the Agamemnon; but can any lover of the Stuarts or of Nelson help me to further corroboration of the story from the cardinal's NELSON.
borne before him.
FitzStephen, however, makes it quite clear that he did nothing of the sort :
'He [Roger] had his own cross carried before him, [though it was] outside his province, as though dart threatening dart. He had been forbidden by the lord pope, in letters despatched to him, to have his cross borne before him in the province of Canterbury," &c.
Yet another point. The cross which Becket carried at Drury Lane was the single cross carried before archbishops (and the Pope, too, for that matter) at the present day; but Roger carried the double or so-called archiepiscopal cross, i.e., a cross with two bars of which the upper is the shorter. There may be authority for this, though the only cross of the kind I have seen in use, viz., at Genoa, was carried at the head of a procession of canons, &c., the archbishop having the plain cross carried before him. The Misses Malleson and Tuker, in their 'Handbook to Christian and Ecclesiastical Rome,' part iv. pp. 470471, seem to be of the opinion that the double cross is usually borne before archbishops, but I am convinced from personal experience that this is an error. It may be used in some places, but certainly the Pope, and the Archbishops of Milan, Genoa, and Westminster, and (if my memory be not at fault) of Mechlin, Florence, Pisa, and Edinburgh, use the simple cross. The Rev. John O'Brien, in his 'History of the Mass,' p. 128, says :
"We are entirely at a loss to know how this double cross came to be an archiepiscopal ensign. Neither the Cærimoniale Episcoporum nor the Pontificale Romanum' gives a word to distinguish it from any other, nor is it spoken of by any liturgical writer of our acquaintance, and there are few
whose works we have not perused. It cannot be denied, however, that such crosses are in use, and that they were formerly in vogue in certain places, particularly with the English prelates. It is gene rally supposed that they found their way into England from the East in the time of the Crusades. It is supposed, too, that his lordship Anthony Beck, Bishop of Durham, whom Pope Clement V., in 1305, created Patriarch of Jerusalem, had something to do with their introduction, for they were very common with the Greeks (Dr. Rock, 'Church of our Fathers,' vol. ii. pp. 218-23). It may interest the reader to know that the only two prelates in the Church who are mentioned by name as having a peculiar right to the double cross are the Patriarch of Venice and the Archbishop of Agria [i.e., presumably. Agram or Zagrab], in Hungary (Kozma, 73, note 3)."
There is evidence that St. Thomas of Canterbury used the simple cross; is there any evidence that Roger of York used the double cross? Of course in art (and in heraldry) the double cross has an unassailable position. The question is, How far was, or is, it actually in use? JOHN B. WAINEWRIGHT.
[See 9th S. vii. 89, 154, 231, 355.] BALLAD SPANISH LADY'S LOVE FOR AN ENGLISHMAN.-How many versions are there of the legend on which this ballad is founded, and to what counties do they belong?
Percy, in his 'Reliques,' speaks of a member of the Popham family as the hero of the story in the west of England, and adds that "another tradition hath pointed out Sir Richard Levison, of Trentham, in Staffordshire, as the subject of this ballad.”
In Lincolnshire Sir John Bolle, of Thorpe Hall, is believed to have been the "gallant captain."
Are there other claimants?
other in 1596. The books are bound in white vellum, and are in almost perfect condition. I should feel deeply indebted if you, or one of your readers, would tell me if these books are of value; and, if so, of what value. W. G. BLAIKIE MURDOCH.
34, Marchmont Crescent, Edinburgh. [Early editions of the great romance of Cervantes are all scarce.]
1. Was Leech ever the regular cartoonist to Punch? Tenniel, I believe, drew all the cartoons from 1860 to the end of the century.
2. Who preceded him? In the forties and fifties there appear to be some signed J. L. (which is presumably Leech), and others unsigned.
3. Is it known who was the artist of these? J. FOSTER Palmer.
DOHERTY, WINCHESTER COMMONER.-Was the son of Lord Chief Justice Doherty who entered Winchester College as a Commoner in 1840 his eldest son, the late John CanningDoherty, Esq., or his second son, the late Rev. Charles William Doherty? If the latter, whence did he derive his M.A. degree-from Durham or Lambeth? JOHN B. WAINEWRIGHT.
ROBERT HENRY IEVERS was admitted into college at Westminster School in 1800, and is said to have been drowned off the African coast. He was a son of Henry Ievers, of Limerick. I should be glad to receive further information about him. G. F. R. B.
GENERAL OFFICERS.-An account of the published about the year 1830. Could any services of distinguished general officers was of your readers give a clue to the account
A. O. H.
"THE SCREAMING SKULL.”—Can any reader throw light on the history of "The Screaming Skull" at Warbleton Priory, in Sussex? What is the first authentic date at which the owners were obliged to keep the skull in the house? and to whom did it belong? Is this the only instance of the story of the screaming skull in England? G. H. MARTIN. The Cottage, Westhope, Craven Arms.
MÉLISANDE ETTARRE.-Did Maeterlinck invent the name Mélisande in his play Pelléas et Mélisande,' or does it occur (as does Pelleas) in the Arthurian legends? Is Mélisande an ordinary French female Christian name? Has the name any connexion with the name or the legend of Mélusine? There seems some resemblance between the story of Mélusine and Maeterlinck's drama.
Did Tennyson invent the name of Ettarre, the character which seems to correspond with Mélisande ? Is not the song Mélisande in the Wood' based upon or suggested by Maeterlinck's play? EDWARD LATHAM.
'LA BELLE ASSEMBLÉE': MISS CUBITT.— Wishing to find to what family the subject of an engraving-viz., Miss Cubitt-which appeared in the above periodical on 1 March, 1818, belonged, I searched the libraries at the British Museum and South Kensington (Art), but was unfortunate, as in each case the particular volume for 1818 was missing.
Would any reader kindly inform me where I can consult a copy of this magazine? or if any one possesses a copy, I should esteem it a favour to receive an excerpt concerning the lady in question. I imagine she was Miss Cubitt, the actress. If so, to what family did she belong? CHARLES E. HEWITT. 20, Cyril Mansions, S. W.
R. L. MORETON.
YACHTING. When was yachting first introduced into this country, and whence? Is it a fact that Charles II. and the Duke of York were the first amateur helmsmen? Any information would be highly appreciated.
BARON SETON, OF ANDRIA.
ROBERT WOOD, TRAVELLER AND POLITICIAN. -His monument, in good preservation, may still be seen in Putney old burial-ground, in the Upper Richmond Road. Can any of your readers inform me whom he married?
Wood was the celebrated traveller and scholar who, in conjunction with James Dawkins, discovered the ruins of Palmyra and Baalbec, and published the beautiful editions of Balbec' and 'Palmyra' (as recorded in the epitaph written by Horace Walpole) to be found in the Library of the
W. T. KYLE.
31, Westbury Road, Clifton, Bristol. [TheD.N.B.' mentions that his wife's Christian name was Ann, but does not give her maiden name.]
JOHN WHITNEY.-Can any one say who this man was? He published in 1700 a book entitled The Genteel Recreation; or, the Pleasure of Angling. A Poem. With a
Dialogue between Piscator and Corydon." He is described as a lover of the angle.' 1820 Mr. J. H. Burn, of Maiden Lane, Covent Garden, reprinted 100 copies from an original print, at that time in the possession of Mr. Major, of Skinner Street. Where is this now? In the preface to the reprint (which is before me) it is conjectured that the author was the son of Capt. Whitney, who commanded one of the ships that accompanied Sir Walter Ralegh in his voyage to Guinea. This same question was asked and unanswered at 3rd S. i. 172 (not 170, as in volume and Series Index). Perchance our good friend Dr. Brushfield may, since 1862, have found something in his researches for his Raleghana of various kinds to throw light on the man. I wonder if John is any relative of Geoffrey Whitney, whose beautiful' Choice of Emblemes,' “Imprinted at Leyden in the house of Christopher Plantyn by Francis Raphelengius, MDLXXXVI.," is before me also as I write.
T. CANN HUGHES, M.A., F.S.A.
GORDON OF THE WEST INDIES.-In Charles Greville's Memoirs,' vol. i. p. 270, I have come across the following statement :
"It was reported that the Duke had given a very rough answer to the West Indian Deputation...... This I mentioned at Brookes's, but Gordon (a West Indian) said that they had all been shocked at the manner in which he (the Duke) had used them." This is under the date 26 Jan., 1830.
Gordon was, and which of the West Indian Can you kindly inform me who that Mr. Islands he came from? For years I have been trying to trace a Mr. Gordon (an ancestor of my late husband's) who went of great importance to us to find out where there, and died between 1838 and 1844. It is he lived and died. Coming over with a deputation was an historical event, and where they came from must have been known. I shall be most grateful if any one can give me information about him. 2, Shrewsbury Road, Bayswater, W.
C. G. Ross.
ROMANOFF AND STUART PEDIGREE. I wonder if you can very kindly give me information on the following point. In what way do the present reigning family (Romanoffs) of Russia come to have Stuart
blood in their veins? Is it through the
exist." He had, as a matter of course, many
BASIL MONTAGU'S MSS.-This busy littérateur is now best remembered by Macaulay's essay on his edition of Bacon; but he left at his death, in 1851 (according to Charles Knight's 'Cyclopædia of Biography"), "about a hundred volumes of MSS., including a Memoir of himself and a Diary." Montagu's wide acquaintance with politicians, lawyers, and men of letters ought to make his memoirs and his diary interesting enough those assigned to him by Bannatyne, and or, perhaps, too interesting-for publication. Can any of your readers say in whose possession these MSS. now are? No information about them is given in the recent account of Montagu in the 'D.N.B.'
KYNASTON'S TRANSLATION OF CHAUCER.— Can any of your readers give information as to the present owner of the MS. of Kynaston's translation into Latin of Chaucer's Troilus' It was sold with James Crossley's library, Manchester, 1884. Has any edition of this ever been printed? and are there other MSS. known?
HARRY H. PEACH.
BOOK-PLATE MOTTO, "TORCULAR CONCULCAVI SOLUS."-Can any one tell me to whom this fairly common book-plate belonged, and what were the place and date of the sale?
POEM BY SIR THOMAS WYATT.
(10th S. iv. 70.)
IT is clear that there are two versions of the lyric "Lo! what it is to love!" and that the one is a deliberate adaptation from the other. The earlier is Sir Thomas Wyatt's, grouped as one of his odes. and the later is assigned in the Bannatyne MS. to Alexander Scott, whom Pinkerton called "the Scottish Anacreon." Wyatt died in 1542; and although little is known of Scott, it is almost safe to say that he was born about 1520, and produced his poems between 1545 and 1568. One of his most ambitious efforts is entitled 'Ane New Year Gift to the Quene Mary, quhen scho come first Hame, 1562.' In 1568, when the plague was raging in Edinburgh, George Bannatyne, a young business man of the city, secluded himself for a period, and occupied his leisure in transcribing into a volume of about 800 pages "nearly all the ancient poetry of Scotland now known to
one of these is "Lo! what it is to love!"
A cursory glance at the Bannatyne MS. shows that, even now, it would profit by careful sifting. The copyist, in his assiduous zeal, had not always exercised an exact discrimination in the choice of his material, and occasionally allowed the work of others as well as Scotsmen to creep into his neatly and closely written pages. It is not necessary to labour this point now; but it is apposite to mention that one of the lyrics included is Sir Thomas Wyatt's ode 'The Recured Lover,' which opens with the line, "I am as I am, and so will I be." Had "Lo! what it is to love!" been in the form in which it appears in Wyatt's works, it would have been easy to say that Bannatyne had given it to Scott by mistake, and the matter would have rested there. As it is, however, the one poem is undoubtedly a compressed re-cast of the other, as if the later poet had tried to give a fresh and impressive setting to what the earlier had elaborated. Wyatt's poem is entitled 'The Abused Lover admonishes the Unwary to beware of Love,' and consists of five stanzas of eight lines each, while in Scott's there are four stanzas, each containing but six lines. In both the opening stanzas are practically identical, but Scott utilizes Wyatt's fifth, third, and second respectively for his second, third, and fourth. The first stanza of each may be given, to show how closely the one movement follows the other, and Scott's fourth and Wyatt's second may be placed together to illustrate the greatest
divergence made by the younger poet from
Lo! what it is to love!
No ways that may
The grounded grief remove,
That doth decay;
Lo! what it is to love.
Scott presents this as follows:
Lo, quhat it is to lufe,
Lerne ye that list to prufe,
Be me, I say, that no ways may,
Bot still decay, both nycht and day;
Wyatt continues the admonition in this wise:
Flee away from the snare:
Of such a train
Which doubles pain,
And endless woe, and care
Flee away from the snare.
In his second and third stanzas Scott slightly
Fle alwayis frome the snair,
It is ane pane, and dowbill trane,
For to refrane that denger plane,
In such a matter it is, of course, evident that an unqualified judgment must not be given, as it would be inevitable and imperative that it should be given in the case of authors who deliberately publish their own writings. The dates of the two poets concerned show decisively that Wyatt's lyric is an independent study, and that nothing can be laid to his charge for the extraordinary coincidence that has thus been revealed. On the other hand, there is enough in Scott's presumably original work to show that he had a strong and serviceable literary faculty, and had no need to depend upon plagiarism, or even imitation, in order to secure artistic and effective results. His address to the queen, to which reference has been made, is a dignified and graceful exercise in the ballet-stave of eight; his Justing and Debait,' after a conventional fashion, is one of the best of its class and his "To luve unluvit it is ane Pane," in its vigorous movement, its procla mation of strenuous independence of spirit,
and the freshness and adequacy of its lyrical expression, fairly anticipates Wither's "Shall I, wasting in despair?" One of the best masters of expressive alliteration in the whole range of Scottish poets, Scott was manifestly given to metrical experiments, and it seems possible, perhaps it is exceedingly probable, that he worked on Wyatt's lyric to see what could be made of it, and left among his papers, without explanation, the chastened result which Bannatyne faithfully transcribed, fully believing that he had to do with an original composition.
[MR. J. GRIGOR also thanked for reply.]
"To PLY" (10th S. iv. 44).-There is, I think, little doubt that the verb ply is the aphetic form of apply, in M.E. aplie, just as pose is of appose. and prentice of apprentice. The article Ply' has not yet been finished for the New English Dictionary,' but it was fully examined when 'Apply' was done, and the general parallelism of sense development noted. If apply be examined in the 'Dictionary,' all the senses of ply will be there found: thus, sense 16, to apply or ply one's business, the plough, the world, husbandry, one's books, devotions, the spade, an oar, &c. So sense 17, to apply or ply a person with questions, speeches, bills, various things. So, also, sense 24 shows a ship applying or plying to Dover or to the Cornish coast. Ply is thus certainly of Romanic derivation, and represents L. plicare; only not plicare as a separate word, but as it exists in composition How these senses were developed from the in Latin applicare, O.F. a-plier, Eng. ap-ply. original one of folding one thing into contact with another can be studied in the Dictionary' in the verb 'Apply,' with which the aphetic form 'Ply' will, when published, be found to correspond. Ply occurs in the West Midland alliterative poem Cleanness,' 1. 1385, and is frequent in Gower in various senses; it has apparently been missed by Stratmann. It has, of course. to be kept historically distinct from its relative ply, to bend, which represents the non-compounded French plier, Latin plicare.
J. A. H. MURRAY.