State of Nature Or Eden?: Thomas Hobbes and His Contemporaries on the Natural Condition of Human Beings
Boydell & Brewer, 2005 - 251 páginas
State of Nature or Eden? Thomas Hobbes and his Contemporaries on the Natural Condition of Human Beings aims to explain how Hobbes's state of nature was understood by a contemporary readership, whose most important reference point for such a condition was the original condition of human beings at the creation, in other words in Eden. The book uses ideas about how readers brought their own reading of other texts to any reading, that reading is affected by the context in which the reader reads, and that the Bible was the model for all reading in the early modern period. It combines these ideas with the primary evidence of the contemporary critical reaction to Hobbes, to reconstruct how Hobbes's state of nature was read by his contemporaries. The book argues that what determined how Hobbes's seventeenth century readers responded to his description of the state of nature were their views on the effects of the Fall. Hobbes's contemporary critics, the majority of whom were Aristotelians and Arminians, thought that the Fall had corrupted human nature, although not to the extent implied by Hobbes's description. Further, they wanted to look at human beings as they should have been, or ought to be. Hobbes, on the other hand, wanted to look at human beings as they were, and in doing so was closer to Augustinian, Lutheran and Reformed interpretations, which argued that nature had been inverted by the Fall. For those of Hobbes's contemporaries who shared these theological assumptions, there were important parallels to be seen between Hobbes's account and that of scripture, although on some points his description could have been seen as a subversion of scripture. The book also demonstrates that Hobbes was working within the Protestant tradition, as well as showing how he used different aspects of this tradition. Helen Thornton is an Independent Scholar. She completed her PhD at the University of Hull.
Opinião das pessoas - Escrever uma crítica
Não foram encontradas quaisquer críticas nos locais habituais.
Outras edições - Ver tudo
Abel’s According to Hobbes account of Cain actions Adam and Eve Adam’s argued that Hobbes argument Augustine authority Bible Biblical Bramhall Brief Disquisition Cain and Abel Cain’s Calvin Cambridge University Press cited Cive Clarendon Commentaries common power commonwealth conscience contemporary critics contradicted created creation Cumberland demonstrated described Discourse disobedience edited Edwin Curley Elements Eve’s evil Fall families fear Filmer Gervase Babington God’s command Heinrich Bullinger Hexapla History Hobbes claimed Hobbes thought Hobbes’s individuals James Tyrrell John John Trapp judged laws of nature Lectures on Genesis Leviathan liberty London Lowde Luther man’s Martinich men’s natural condition natural equality natural law naturally sociable Needler Noel Malcolm Observations 1657 parents passions peace perfect Philosophy political theory Political Thought preservation protestant commentators Quentin Skinner reason Religion Richard Cumberland right of nature Ross Schoolmen scriptural account seventeenth century readers simply Skinner things Thomas Hobbes Trapp Treatise views Whateley William Lucy women