I. The first proposition then that I am to endeavor to establish, is, That the General Judgment announc with its note of admiration, but to hint, that the Divine Judge would find such a mode of judgment too troublesome and difficult? If my dulness of apprehension causes me to do our assailant any injustice, I beg his pardon; but if this be not the meaning of the sentence, it appears to me to have no meaning at all, but to be the merest nonsense; and whether such a meaning will raise it much above nonsense, the reader must determine. The objector insinuates, that to judge of the cases of sixty persons in a minute, is too hard for Omniscience; wherefore, to simplify the matter, he would have all who have died from the beginning of the world to the end of it judged at once. He goes on:" And if that be true also, which a zealous Swedenborgian once told me, that according to their doctrine the world will never be at an end, but will last for ever, then there must be an everlasting propagation of mankind." This is a sad aggravation of the difficulty, indeed. If the human race is thus to continue, and the ratio of its increase goes on as at present, instead of only sixty dying in a minute, there will at length be six hundred, or six thousand; and then how can they be judged? The mind of the objector is overwhelmed at the thought; and he apprehends that the Almighty must sink under the task, as he does under the idea. Can he really mean to suggest that "the everlasting propagation of mankind" is too much for Infinity? Can he in fact suppose, that Infinity can be satisfied with less? Can he behold the countless multitude of suns which the telescope discovers to us, each accompanied, as reason necessarily concludes, with its dependent worlds; can he admit that all these are replenished with inhabitants, and with an endless variety of natural productions, like the world in which we live; can he believe that the minutest and the greatest of all things are alike the workmanship of the Creator; and that his providence, throughout all worlds, is as universal as the Lord teaches when he says, that not a sparrow falls to the ground without our heavenly Father, and that the very hairs of our head are all numbered? Can his mind embrace all this, and then shrink from the congenial idea, that He who has produced and who governs these mighty works, did not create them for the sake of uncreating them again, but, as they are boundless in extent, so are they intended to be in duration, and their Creator will continue to draft off from them inhabitants for his heavenly kingdom, in continually increasing numbers, without end? Alas, this thought seems to distress our poor friend most of all; for he adds, as something transcendantly monstrous, " And then again, according to this New Jerusalem doctrine, all mankind after death become either angels in heaven or devils in hell; wherefore, it clearly follows that this world, their doctrine being admitted, is nothing but a manufactory of angels and devils!" Most truly, it does so follow : and if the inference thus sagaciously brought out is sufficient to condemn the "New Jerusalem doctrine," we have not a syllable to offer in extenuation. If Mr B. will have it so, "this world is nothing but a manufactory of angles and devils." And pray, for what "manufactory," more worthy of its Creator than that of angels, does he think it can be designed? (as for devils, he knows that, according to our doctrines, they are not manufactured such by the ed in Scripture, as to be performed at the Second Coming of the Lord, was not to take place in the natural world, as commonly supposed, but in the spiritual. That it was not to take place in the natural world, is evident from this consideration: that the circumstances announced in prophecy as being to attend it, are such as cannot be intended to be literally understood, and, some of them, such as are impossible in the nature of things. For what is the nature of the Last Judgment, according to the common apprehensions of it; and how is it to be performed? We have all been told from our childhood, that angels are to appear with trumpets, the sound of which shall be so loud, as not only to rouse to a sense of the great event at hand the whole race of mankind then living upon the globe, but also to wake the dead: for then "a mighty trump, one half concealed In clouds, one half to mortal eye revealed, Or, as another poet describes it, "Celestial guards the topmost height attend, And from their tombs the thronging corses rise." No matter how long since they may have lain mouldering in the dust, nor how widely their particles may have been scattered asunder; no matter into what other substances they may have passed; nor even though, by being devoured by cannibals, or by passing into the substances of vegetables and animals, and being thence again taken into the human system, they may have formed parts Creator, but by themselves.) Does he mean to deny the fact, and affirm that mankind do not become either angels or devils? It really is not easy to tell what he means; further than this; that he is determined, at any rate, to contradict the doctrines of the New Jerusalem, but cannot find anything plausible to urge against them. The plain English of such objections is this,-that those sublime and heavenly doctrines make God too wise, too good, and too great. * Young. † Amhurst's translation of Addison's celebrated Latin poem on the Altar-piece of Magdalen College, Oxford. of human bodies many times over; no matter for these and a thousand difficulties more, all shall revive: "And now, from every corner of the earth, This description, to be sure, exposes a little of the inconveniences of the operation; however, all shall be made complete, Embezzled or mislaid of the whole tale. Each soul shall have a body ready-furnished; The whole terraqueous globe, it seems, like one huge mine, is suddenly to explode, and every spot, both of earth and sea, is to shoot out a human body: "So when famed Cadmus sowed the fruitful field, These, however, though they appear as men complete, are as yet only men's bodies: the souls, therefore, which formerly animated them, and which have been reserved in some unknown region, are to be called from their obscure and not very comfortable retreat, and united with them again: "The body thus renewed, the conscious soul, * Amhurst's Addison. + Blair. Well may the poet add, "Ask not how this shall be." And well may both poet and dogmatist seek to silence inquiry with the magic word " Omnipotence.” tAmhurst's Addison. Or midst the burning planets wondering strayed, And feared, or wished, for her appointed fate; And notwithstanding the multitude of spirits and bodies thus seeking for each other, they shall all find their own, "Nor shall the conscious soul Mistake its partner; but amidst the crowd, Singling its other half, into its arms Shall rush, with all the impatience of a man That's new come home, who having long been absent, In pain to see the whole." These then are all to join those who may then be living, "Ten thousand trumpets now at once advance; While this is proceeding, all the elements sympathize: "Reverse all Nature's web shall run, And spotless Misrule, all around, Order, its flying foe, confound, While backward all the threads shall haste to be unspun." * Young. + Blair. + Young. "The sun, by sympathy concerned, The neighboring moon, as if a purple flood "No more the stars, with paler beams, What mimics them so twinkling there; And agonize in warm desire, Or slake their heat as in the stream they roll. Whilst the World burns, and all the orbs below In their expiring ruins glow, They sink, and unsupported leave the skies, Which fall abrupt, and tell their torment in their noise." "This globe, alone, would but defraud the fire, Starve its devouring rage: the flakes aspire And catch the clouds; and make the heavens their prey: All, all is lost: no monument, no sign, Where once so proudly blazed the gay machine. The great Creator's six-days' work devour."t 本 It is thus that the Last Judgment is usually described. I have taken my delineation of it from the poets, because it is to poetry that such ideas properly appertain: I have been careful, however, not to borrow from them any circumstances of their own invention, but only such as, whether related in poetry or in prose, are generally believed to belong to the subject; and it would be easy to repeat all their statements from almost every prose-writer who has handled the theme. Of the poets, also, whom I have cited, three were clergymen, whose orthodoxy has never been disputed; and the fourth (Addison), is an author, whose authority, on such a subject, few of the clergy would reject. But who can weigh, in the balance of a cool deliberate judgment, such representations as the above, without concluding, that the facts affirmed in them are as purely poetical as the language?-in other ↑ Young. * Pomfret. |