If the whole meaning of Cainan was eliminated from this genealogy the church could not live.

It is human nature to seek solace for sorrow. All animal kinds seek sympathy for pain of mind or body, for which they give thanks and praise. Therefore, it is natural that the offspring of Cainan should be Mahalalleel, meaning he that praises God.

Some appreciation of the efficacious nature of this doctrine is seen in the following:

"And fear came upon every soul.

"And all that believed were together, and had all things in common.

"And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.

"And they praised God." (Acts 2.)

Is there any significance in this communistic suggestion? No such thing actually occurred. This is a clean-cut, hypnotic suggestion, and is plainly revolutionary and contrary to civilized theories regarding the national life.

Mahalalleel begat Jared.

Jared means descent, he who commands, an hereditary ruler, hereditary empire.

It is natural that he should beget Enoch, meaning discipline.

Under the lineage of Cain, Enoch begat Irad, meaning Empire, but under the line of Enos, Enoch begets Methuselah, meaning death, presumably because of old age, for he is the oldest Antediluvian and the grandfather of Noah, meaning rest, repose. The grave is the last resting place of the body.

Methusaleh begat Lamech, meaning poor, made low, struck. Lamech begat Noah, meaning rest, repose, consolation. It is well to note that in the fourth chapter of Genesis, Cain, possession, is the father of Enoch, discipline, a logical continuity. "Possession is nine points in law."

In the fifth chapter, Jared, descent, empire, who commands, is the father of Enoch, discipline.

It is now very plain why death and poverty become essential elements in the establishing of discipline and control. Old age, poverty, and death do not struggle against oppression or discipline.

This is why the doctrine exists that poverty and ignorance are essential to control over humanity, a doctrine introduced and secretly advocated by ecclesiasticism since Christianity first seized control of government.

Who has the assurance to declare that this consecutive continuity of double meaning words and names is merely coincidental? It must have a sinister meaning and purpose, inten- tionally concealed from the masses of people, but known to the secret, inner brotherhood.

Why this concealment ?

This is but a simple beginning compared with later revelations. The whole Bible is a masterpiece of concealment and is subject to similar interpretation. Parts of it conceal absolute duplicity, strongly suggestive of the wilfull and premeditated betrayal of ignorant and trusting humanity, and always suggesting authority.

The Christian dispensation of the new testament is hidden in rehearsal in the old testament, which is merely a fabulous and fictitious background for the Christian exploitation.

"There is nothing covered that shall not be revealed, and hid that shall not be known." (Matthew 10:26).

This is the promise made to the disciples and confesses there are things concealed and hidden. Why?

We are writing this book for the "multitudes which are without," for no promise of revelation of these secrets is made to them. Yet they are the victims. Why shouldn't they know what is being secretly planned?

"And the disciples came and said unto him (Christ), why speakest thou unto them (the multitudes) in parables?

"He answered and said unto them, 'because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.

"Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.'" (Matthew 13.)

For what purpose is this concealment ?

We are told in succeeding verses, in the same chapter, that it is to fulfill the prophecy of Esaias,

Thus a Christ sent to save the ignorant masses, sacrifices them in order to vindicate an alleged prophecy which declares these things must not be understood "lest they should be converted."

Who is this Esaias? He is Isaiah in disguisé, meaning the salvation of the Lord. In the new testament he becomes Esaias, the salvation of John, because active prophecy could not pass over from the old to the new dispensation.

It is thus revealed why the multitudes must be sacrificed to prophecy. This alleged prophecy is not only the salvation of the Lord and of John, but is the whole background of Christianity. Enforced fulfillment is found throughout the new testament, in the form of rank deceit. Not one single alleged prophecy in the Bible has been naturally fulfilled.

The all-wise priesthood attempted to anticipate the future events of expanding humanity, believing they could force fulfillment of their defective guessing.

We can draw but one conclusion regarding this period from Adam to Noah. It is a period of preparation in which essential genealogical lines are established and their characters adjusted to a code of personification or theoretical significance, before the construction of a fabulous people as characters in a play rehearsal of the projected scheme. It is the earthy foundation.

ner.

We will vindicate this conclusion in no uncertain man

It required five hundred years to eliminate gnosticism and adjust its philosophy to the fanciful ecclesiastic scheme, and then followed a period of rest and preparation for one hundred years. Noah, symbolizing this period, was five hundred years

old when he was warned of the flood, and he was six hundred years of age when it came. This identifies the period when gnosticism was suppressed. The flood was a deluge of propaganda broadcasted over the world through missionaries. The alleged ark was the treasure chest to be filled for this elaborate campaign. The three sons of Noah saved for this campaign

were:

Shem, name and fame.

Japheth, persuasion, enlargement.

Ham, hot, enthusiasm, fervor, zeal.

These select powers are subject to unlimited extension, the functions of these three imaginary characters being extended by alleged offspring, to relieve the parent stem of responsibility. This is the ecclesiastic policy, cowardly beyond expression. The church never admits direct responsibility for anything; "God, the high priest, and the law, can do no wrong."

We shall now take up each of these sons of Noah and determine just what he and his spawn are expected to do.

Do not lose sight of the important fact that from the parent stem, branches spring to cover especial functions in a projected enterprise. The limbs bear fruit, not the trunk.

Here ends the earthy or solid period, the fluid or water period beginning with Noah.

PART V

THE THEORY: SHEM THE HEAD OF THE

CHURCH

THE WATER PERIOD I-NOAH TO ABRAHAM

(Rest and recuperation, or death and dissolution, follow exhaustion.)

The Christian idea would have us believe that God, having created the heaven, the earth, the sun, moon, and stars, the vegetation and animals, concluded to take a rest from this his earthy task.

It was essential to account for these things which had been in existence ages and ages previous to Christianity. They had to be disposed of before a new and godlike race could be raised up. It was a humiliating confession for a god to make, that his work was a total failure, the evidence that he is human. "And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart." (Genesis 6:6.)

"For the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth." (Genesis 8:21.)

John tells us:

"God is a spirit." (John 4:24.)

What kind of foolishness is this? One part of the Bible tells us that God is a being with animal organs, and another part says He is "a spirit, and must be worshipped as a spirit."

Nevertheless, this is to account for the disappearance of all the millions of people previous to Noah. That is, eight generations of the Adamites were destroyed that Noah, the ninth from Adam, might take possession of the world in the name of God, who was to start out anew to repeople the earth with the very identical seed with which he had first begun. But one per