...which the penalty or forfeiture attached, or the liability was created. Amended Code, $ 109. § 594. No acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of...contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby ; but this section does not alter the effect of any payment of principal or interest....

...suffileilginenl ^ ' proniSw C^ent evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby made^n to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby; but this section shall not...

...promise shall be suffipro"m^e cient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby made iu to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby ; but this section shall not...

...acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the ;y to be charged thereby ; but this section shall not alter...

...acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing, signed by the party to be charged thereby ; but this section shall not...

...acknowledgment or promise shall be sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, whereby to take the case out of the operation of this title, unless the same be contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby ; but this section shall not...

...what was then said and done, and not upon what was transacted antecedently. By the code (§ 110) no acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract whereby to take the case out of the operation of the title prescribing the limitations, unless the...

...requires that a promise, to take a case out of the operation of the statute of limitations, mnst be " contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby." The court below held that this provision of the code was applicable to the case, and, upon that ground,...

...or continuing contract, to take a case out of the operation of [lie statute of limitation!', units.' contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby. The effect of the enactment of the provision in the Code of 1849, requiring such promise to be in wilting,...

...which wns the result of sueh a discretion. A'. Y. & Harlem RR Co. v. The Mayor, &c., of XY, 562 29. No acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract, to take a case out of the operation of the statute of limitations, unless contained in some writing...