ably suited to the function. Every animal is a bundle of adaptations, which have been wrought out through ages and have often attained a high degree of perfection. Disharmonies are sometimes to be detected, especially when the organism is changing its habitat or habits, but they are few and far between. When we consider organs such as the eye, the heart, the kidneys, the placenta binding mother and young together in their intimate ante-natal symbiosis, we discover a multitude of subtle adaptations; and "the narrowest hinge in my hand puts to scorn all machinery "-for the perfection of mammalian joints is extraordinary. When the modern zoologist speaks of the adaptation of an organ he means not only that it is fit, effective, and well-adjusted, but that it is a product of a long process of evolution-the theoretical interpretation of which is still a very difficult problem. Some well-shaped structures, like the heart, are for the most part concerned with the internal economy of the body; others, like limbs, are mainly significant in relation to the environment. But there is no hard and-fast line here, for the ptarmigan's heart is specially adapted to high altitudes and the antelope's to the necessity of rapid escape on the plains. Some adaptations are mainly structural, as we see in the strong arch of a tortoise's carapace, and others mainly functional, as in the arrangements for regulating the temperature of the blood in birds and mammals; but the two aspects are inseparable. Some of the most exquisite adaptations are those that secure the harmonious co-operation of different parts of the body, as when the mother-mammal is prepared for her offspring before its development begins, during the ante-natal life, and after it is born. 1 From amid innumerable adaptations 1 we select one other instance, that of an African egg-eating snake, Dasypeltis scabra, a weak-bodied creature less than a yard in length, which is able to swallow birds' eggs three times the diameter of the thickest part of the body. The jaws are almost toothless, but a few posterior teeth are present which serve to grip the egg. There is the usual 1 See the author's Wonder of Life, p. 523 (Melrose; London, 1914). Among the many adaptations the following may be noted. (I) The skeleton is lightly built, many of the bones are hollow girders-light for their size. In many bones of (II) At various parts of the skeleton fusion of bones occurs. This is very marked in the skull, and may make (III) As the bird has surrendered its arm to making a wing, the skull has to serve as a hand. (IV) The powerful muscles of flight are chiefly attached to the keel or carina (3) of the breast-bone or sternum. The alternate gripping and muscular engulfing, and the intact egg slips into the gullet. It is then met by the sharp points of the inferior spines of a number of the vertebræ, which project into the gullet, and cut the egg-shells. It is said that they are actually tipped with enamel. The result of the structural adaptation is that none of the precious egg is wasted. Mr. Ditmars, the Curator of Reptiles at the Zoological Park in New York, who has a wide experience of living snakes, says that the empty egg-shells are always returned, and that this habit is quite unique. The student is strongly advised to make a practical study of some structures, such as a sheep's heart, a bullock's eye, a dog's skull, a bird's skeleton, the appendages of a crayfish, the lantern of a sea-urchin, in order to become convinced of the intricacy and finish of adaptations. We have taken the bird's skeleton as an illustration (Fig. 59). CHAPTER XII BACKBONELESS ANIMALS 1. Protozoa-2. Sponges-3. Stinging-animals or Coelentera-4. "Worms”—5. Echinoderms-6. Arthropods-7. Molluscs— 8. Other Types 1. Protozoa.—It is likely that the first breath of life was in the water, for there most of the simplest animals and plants have their haunts. We call them simple, but there was much truth in Ehrenberg's view, who described some of them in 1838 as "perfect organisms." He was wrong in thinking he saw stomach, heart, and similar organs in them, but right in recognising that they often have a very intricate structure. There is a widespread erroneous idea that these animalcules are to be found swarming in any drop of water. The clear water of daily use will generally disappoint, or rather please us by showing little trace of living things. But take a test-tube of water from a stagnant pool, hold it between your eyes and the light, and it is likely that you will see many forms of life. Simple plants and simple animals are there, the former represented by threads, ovals, and spheres in green, the latter by more mobile almost colourless specks or whitish motes which dance in the water. But besides these there are jerky swimmers whose appearance almost suggests their popular name of " water-fleas," and wriggling worms," thinner than thread and lither than eels: both of these may be very small, but closer examination shows that they have parts and organs, that they are many-celled not singlecelled animals. 66 Vary the observations by taking water in which hay |