Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub

258

QUESTION:

Which is the more happy·

a Barbarous, or a

Civilised, Man?

Ir may be said that the savage is more happy than the civilised man, inasmuch as,

I. His free and unrestrained life makes him physically healthier.

II. His wants are more simple and more easily satisfied.

III. He is free from the cares, anxieties, jealousies, fears, and ambitions of civilised life. IV. He is less liable to disorder, either of body or of mind.

V. He is free from the vices of society: intemperance - hypocrisy — deceit and fraud.

In opposition it may be said:

I. That the freedom of life which the savage enjoys is but a poor substitute for the comforts of shelter, clothing, and food, which the

civilised man enjoys: the best proof of which is found in the universal fact, that whenever the savage gets within reach of the civilised man's habits, he adopts them; whilst the civilised man is never attracted towards the habits of the savage.

II. That, although the wants of the savage are simpler and fewer than the wants of the civilised man, his pleasures are also fewer, for he enjoys none of the delights of thought— of affection of social happiness of hopeand of religious belief.

III. That, although he is free from the anxieties of life, he is also without knowledge of its privileges and pleasures, both of sense and

soul.

IV. That, although he is less liable to physical and mental disease, he is also less capable of enjoyment. He has no disease, but he has no happy health: neither his bodily nor his spiritual powers are turned to good account. V. That, although he is partially free from the vices of society, he is also unacquainted with its virtues. Benevolence - pity— honour heroism constancy endurance - generosity patriotism-fortitude - and resistance to temptation—are all unknown to him: whilst he is free from the thorns, he is also without the flowers of life.

--

The state of the savage is darkness. Darkness mental and moral. The thrilling delights of thought of reflection- and of judgment, are never his his best ideas are vague, idle, dreamy, and useless. The unspeakable pleasures of home— of love of relationship of friendship and of social intercourse, are altogether unknown by him. The happiness that waits on an approving conscience the ineffable pleasure that follows a good deed done, or a bad deed avoided is a stranger to the savage breast. Above all, the exquisite happiness the civilised man derives from religious impression and belief—the unutterable joy which he feels in the conviction that he has a kind Father in Heaven on whom he can implicitly rely, and in the certainty that he is immortal, and shall never taste of death, all this is entirely unfelt and unknown to the barbarian. The poet says:

"Where ignorance is bliss 'tis folly to be wise."

But ignorance is never bliss.

See THE HISTORY OF CIVILISATION.

Mackinnon, Esq., M.P.

By W. A.

HOBBES'S TREATISE ON HUMAN NATURE.–

"Love of Knowledge."

ROUSSEAU'S CONTRÂT SOCIAL.

HUME'S ESSAYS, "ON REFINEMENT IN THE

ARTS," vol. i. p. 285.

GOLDSMITH'S CITIZEN OF THE WORLD, Letters
XI. and LXXXII.

PART III.

QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION.

1. Which was the greater man, Oliver Cromwell or Napoleon Bonaparte ?

See CARLYLE'S LETTERS AND SPEECHES OF CROM

WELL.

CHANNING'S CHARACTER OF NAPOLEON.

SOUTHEY'S CROMWELL.

SCOTT'S LIFE OF NAPOLEON.

MITCHELL'S FALL OF NAPOLEON.

HAZLITT'S LIFE OF NAPOLEON.

CARLYLE'S HERO-WORSHIP. "THE HERO AS

KING."

ROBERT HALL ON BONAPARTE.

MACAULAY'S CRITICAL ESSAYS, vol. i. pp. 180187.

HALLAM'S CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY.

LORD BROUGHAM'S STATESMEN IN THE REIGN
OF GEORGE III. "Napoleon."

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

P. FRASER TYTLER'S LIFE OF MARY.
MISS STRICKLAND'S LETTERS OF MARY.
BELL'S LIFE OF MARY.

MRS. JAMESON'S LIFE OF MARY.

ROBERTSON'S HISTORY OF SCOTLAND.
EDINBURGH REVIEW, vol. xliv.

p. 37.

NOTE. This discussion will embrace the following considerations: For what crimes did Mary suffer? Did she commit the offences alleged against her? And had the law of England any jurisdiction over her?

3. Has the Invention of Gunpowder been of Benefit to Mankind?

See CHANNING ON WAR.

GIBBON'S DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN
EMPIRE, chap. lxv.

EDINBURGH Review, vol. v. p. 471.

NOTE.—It is intended to inquire by this question, Whether Gunpowder, by making war more dreadful and abhorrent, has not tended to lead mankind to its discontinuance ? whether, in fact, perfection in War does not necessarily lead to the preference of Peace.

The use of Gunpowder in Mechanics may be taken into consideration with advantage to the discussion.

« AnteriorContinuar »