Nomination of Warren E. Burger: Hearing, Ninety-first Congress, First Session. June 3, 1969, Volume 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969 - 116 páginas |
No interior do livro
Resultados 1-5 de 53
Página 2
... tion ; and Charles Rhyne , of Washington , D.C. , past president of the American Bar Association . The following are past presidents of the Federal Bar Association : Hon . Robert N. Anderson ; Laurence H. Axman ; Frank J. Delaney ...
... tion ; and Charles Rhyne , of Washington , D.C. , past president of the American Bar Association . The following are past presidents of the Federal Bar Association : Hon . Robert N. Anderson ; Laurence H. Axman ; Frank J. Delaney ...
Página 2
... tion ; and Charles Rhyne , of Washington , D.C. , past president of the American Bar Association . The following are past presidents of the Federal Bar Association : Hon . Robert N. Anderson ; Laurence H. Axman ; Frank J. Delaney ...
... tion ; and Charles Rhyne , of Washington , D.C. , past president of the American Bar Association . The following are past presidents of the Federal Bar Association : Hon . Robert N. Anderson ; Laurence H. Axman ; Frank J. Delaney ...
Página 5
... tion ? Judge BURGER . No ; clearly no . It has no power to amend the Con- stitution . The CHAIRMAN . Does the Supreme Court have the power to legislate judicial interpretations ? Judge BURGER . I think as you put the question , clearly ...
... tion ? Judge BURGER . No ; clearly no . It has no power to amend the Con- stitution . The CHAIRMAN . Does the Supreme Court have the power to legislate judicial interpretations ? Judge BURGER . I think as you put the question , clearly ...
Página 7
... tion as he does in his pocket and in being interviewed said in substance : " Here is what the words say , and they are very plain words , and I take them for what they are . 99 I think I would subscribe to the views of Mr. Justice Black ...
... tion as he does in his pocket and in being interviewed said in substance : " Here is what the words say , and they are very plain words , and I take them for what they are . 99 I think I would subscribe to the views of Mr. Justice Black ...
Página 9
... tion in criminal cases is 14.8 months ; in civil cases it is 13.9 months . Another area of great concern is the fact that since 1959 , the number of cases being held by U.S. courts of appeals for more than 3 months after the argument ...
... tion in criminal cases is 14.8 months ; in civil cases it is 13.9 months . Another area of great concern is the fact that since 1959 , the number of cases being held by U.S. courts of appeals for more than 3 months after the argument ...
Outras edições - Ver tudo
Palavras e frases frequentes
2d SERIES 395 FEDERAL REPORTER 90th Congress accused action Adam Clayton Powell administration American Bar Association appellant Powell Appellant's Appellees arrest Attorney Baker Burger as Chief Chairman Chief Justice claims Clause confession CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Constitution counsel Court of Appeals crime criminal justice criminal procedure D.C. DEAR SENATOR DEAR SENATOR EASTLAND decisions District Court District of Columbia evidence exclude Federal Bar Association federal judicial Federal Rules Fifth Amendment Frazier hearing House of Representatives identification issue JAMES EASTLAND Judge Burger Judge Warren jurisdiction Keahon L.Ed lawyers legislative LIBRARY OF CONGRES LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Mallory matter McCORMACK Cite ment Miranda past president person police political question Powell's problems qualifications record relief rulemaking S.Ct Select Committee Senate Judiciary Committee Senator DIRKSEN Senator TYDINGS speech statement statute supra note Supreme Court tion trial U.S. Court U.S. Senate United vote waiver Warren Burger Warren E Washington
Passagens conhecidas
Página 97 - If the interrogation continues without the presence of an attorney and a statement is taken, a heavy burden rests on the government to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his privilege against self-incrimination and his right to retained or appointed counsel.
Página 75 - In a case of actual controversy within its jurisdiction, except with respect to Federal taxes, any court of the United States, upon the filing of an appropriate pleading, may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be sought. Any such declaration, shall have the force and effect of a final judgment or decree and shall be reviewable as such.
Página 99 - Whatever the testimony of the authorities as to waiver of rights by an accused, the fact of lengthy interrogation or incommunicado incarceration before a statement is made is strong evidence that the accused did not validly waive his rights.
Página 73 - ... an unusual need for unquestioning adherence to a political decision already made; or the potentiality of embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question.
Página 66 - We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given.
Página 72 - Prominent on the surface of any case held to involve a political question is found a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department; or a lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards for resolving it; or the impossibility of deciding without an initial policy determination of a kind clearly for nonjudicial discretion; or the impossibility of a court's undertaking independent resolution without expressing lack of the...
Página 79 - In order to enable and encourage a representative of the public to discharge his public trust with firmness and success, it is indispensably necessary, that he should enjoy the fullest liberty of speech, and that he should be protected from the resentment of every one, however powerful, to whom the exercise of that liberty may occasion offence.
Página 42 - tainted fruit" determination required by the Court involves more than considerable difficulty. I think it is practically impossible. How is a witness capable of probing the recesses of his mind to draw a sharp line between a courtroom identification due exclusively to an earlier lineup and a courtroom identification due to memory not based on the lineup? What kind of "clear and convincing evidence" can the prosecution offer to prove upon what particular events memories resulting in an in-court identification...
Página 42 - The premise for the Court's rule is not the general unreliability of eyewitness identifications nor the difficulties inherent in observation, recall, and recognition. The Court assumes a narrower evil as the basis for its rule — improper police suggestion which contributes to erroneous identifications. The Court apparently believes that improper police procedures are so widespread that a broad prophylactic rule must be laid down, requiring the presence of counsel at all pretrial identifications,...
Página 108 - If you cannot afford a lawyer and want one, a lawyer will be provided for you. If you want to answer questions now without a lawyer present you will still have the right to stop answering at any time. You also have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to a lawyer.