Imagens das páginas
PDF
ePub
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][graphic][merged small][merged small]

CHAPTER XII.

THE TRANSIT OF A YEAR.

BY EDMUND ALTON.

LET us now revert to the events following the inauguration of 1873, to which I have referred in an earlier chapter. Returning to our Chamber, the Vice-President resumed the chair at 12:47 o'clock, the ceremonies on the portico having occupied not half an hour. After the passage of the usual resolutions, fixing the hour of daily meeting and providing for the notification of the President that the Senate had convened in obedience to his

proclamation, the Senate adjourned to the following Thursday.

This special session of the Senate was called by the President, principally, if not wholly, to have that body act upon his nominations of men to office. The session being purely for the transaction of executive business, no legislation was permissible. There was no House of Representatives, and would be none until the following December, unless an extraordinary occasion should in the meantime arise requiring the exercise of its power. After appointing its committees for the session, and attending to the business submitted by the

* Copyright, 1884, by Edmund Alton. All rights reserved.

President, on the twenty-sixth day of March, with the usual formalities, the Senate adjourned, to meet again, however, on the first Monday in December, unless called together again by the President before that time.

During the course of its proceedings, it ap- pointed Senator Carpenter to be President of the Senate pro tempore,* to act as presiding officer during the absence of the Vice-President, who was not able to attend every day. This position of President pro tempore is a very important one. If the President of the United States die or otherwise become incapable of performing the duties of that office, they devolve upon the Vice-President, and the President of the Senate pro tempore becomes the acting Vice-President of the United States; and, in the event of the death of both the President and VicePresident, the President of the Senate pro tempore acts as President of the United States until the election of another President as provided by law. In Great Britain and many other nations of the world the succession to the throne depends upon blood relationship. Those nations are therefore not likely ever to be without persons to act as rulers. Our line of succession, however, is very short — after the President of the Senate pro tempore comes the Speaker of the House, and beyond that no provision has been made by Congress under the authority conferred upon it by the Constitution. But at the time of which I write, there was no House, and consequently no Speaker; so if the President and Vice-President as well as the President of the Senate pro tempore had died, after the adjournment of that special session, the Government would have had no head.

Such a state of affairs would have been, to say the least, very inconvenient. And we were not long ago on the brink of just such a condition of things. When President Garfield died there was no Speaker of the House, and the Senate had carelessly adjourned without choosing a President pro tempore. Providentially, Vice-President Arthur was alive, and he assumed the office of President. Had anything happened to him, there might have been confusion. So alarmed were many people about it that, when Congress met, it was asked to pass a law creating a longer line of succession, in order to guard against such an emergency again occurring. You would naturally suppose, from the anxiety that prevailed, that Congress made such a law at once. But it did not; and, although several years have elapsed, no such law has yet been enacted. If you have influence with any members of Congress, it might be well to call their attention to this subject, and urge upon them the importance of taking action in the matter.

us to become acquainted with the new senators, and then we separated. During that long vacation of eight months, we pages, like the senators, scattered ourselves over the entire country, one going to California and another to Maine. We indulged in the ordinary juvenile delights; but, although we had a grand time, we were only too happy when the first of December came around and both Houses again convened.

There was nothing unusual about the proceedings of the Senate on the opening day. So I went over to the House of Representatives. This was the beginning of the first regular session of the Forty-third Congress, and at twelve o'clock the clerk of the last House (there being no Speaker) called the members to order. After a call of the roll, the clerk said:

"Two hundred and eighty-one members having answered to their names, being more than a quorum, the clerk is now ready to receive a motion to proceed to the election of Speaker."

Several members arose and suggested the names of various persons; but every one knew beforehand who would be elected. The Republicans were in the majority, and prior to the meeting of the House, they had come together and held a caucus. A caucus is a secret session of Congressmen all of the same party, in which they talk over the policy of legislation and other matters, and agree to act together. The Republicans of the House, as well as those of the Senate, have frequent caucuses; so also do the Democrats. In this particular caucus, the Republican members of the House had agreed to nominate and vote for James G. Blaine as Speaker. He had been the Speaker of the preceding House. Tellers were appointed, and, as the majority of the House voted for Mr. Blaine, he was declared by the clerk duly elected Speaker of the House of Representatives of the Forty-third Congress. He was conducted to the chair by two of the members, and made a brief address; whereupon, Mr. Dawes, at the request of the Clerk, administered the oath to the Speaker. Then the Speaker swore in the members in attendance, and after the election of a clerk, sergeant-at-arms, door-keeper, postmaster, and chaplain, the organization of the House was complete. The appointment of committees being the privilege of the Speaker, it required several days for him to make up the list; but, with this exception, the House was ready to begin making laws.

The House having notified the Senate of its organization, there remained but one other interesting feature of the proceedings. Every member naturally wished the best seat in the hall that he could obtain; and as all of them could not be "For the time being."

The Senate remained in session long enough for

satisfied, the question was determined by a game of chance. The clerk placed in a box as many slips of paper as there were representatives, each bearing the name of a representative, and he then drew these slips from the box one at a time. (The member oldest in continuous service, and also Mr. Alexander H. Stephens, who, on account of his age and infirmity, was "entitled to consideration on the part of the House," were permitted to choose seats before the drawing commenced.) Then all the other members retired beyond the outer row, and each representative, as the slip bearing his name was drawn and called, came forward and selected a seat. It was quite an amusing performance; the law-makers enjoyed the fun fully as much as did the spectators in the gallery; and the countenances of the fortunate members beamed with the smiles of childish joy.

In the Senate, this matter of seats is settled in a different way. At the beginning of every Congress, the newly elected senators choose from among the vacant seats in the order in which each senator notifies Captain Bassett, on the principle of "first come, first served;" and if they do not get satisfactory seats, they "speak" for other seats, in the event of such seats becoming vacant during their term of office. Captain Bassett keeps a record of all these requests in a book, and often the same seat will be spoken for by three or four senators. I remember one senator, who had a seat very desirable on account of its location, who became suddenly ill-so ill that he was not expected to live. Several of the other senators applied for his seat; and, when the senator heard of it, he declared he would not die. And he did not; he even lived to see the seats of these senators who had spoken for his become vacant.

Within a few days both Houses were in running order, and things went on quietly for several months. But on the eleventh of March, 1874, the monotony was broken. My attention on that day was attracted to this unusual language used by the Chaplain of the Senate in his opening prayer:

"We miss some of our number, who are withdrawn from these seats and are lying prostrate with sickness and disease; and especially one who but yesterday came into this Chamber with all the

presence of his manly form, but now, when we meet again this morning, lies close to the edge of the dark river."

remember his calling me to him and making some pleasant remarks as he whittled the end of his pen-holder. That pen I have to-day, the last he ever used in the Senate, and probably in the world. I went to the House of Representatives to get away from the gloom, but found the shadow wherever I went. I remained in the Hall of Representatives until three o'clock, and was just on the point of leaving, when the Speaker arose and in a trembling voice remarked:

"The Chair lays before the House the following telegram this moment received." And then, amid painful silence and suspense, the Clerk read:

"Senator Sumner died at ten minutes before three o'clock."

The effect of the announcement was startling. The vast audience seemed dazed and actually at a loss for breath, and the House at once adjourned. It is needless to describe the sensation produced throughout the city. The news of that death instantly spread like a pall over the country, and caused profound national grief.

The next day the Senate adjourned after passing resolutions in regard to the funeral arrangements, and the House did likewise. On Friday, the thirteenth, the Senate assembled at the usual hour. The desk and chair of the deceased senator were covered with crape, and the walls of the room were heavily draped in mourning. The senators came in noiselessly. The air was oppressive, and the Senate floor and galleries were strangely silent when the Diplomatic Corps arrived, dressed in black, and took the seats prepared for them. tered the House of Representatives in a body, the senators standing as the members were being seated; following the representatives came the Supreme Court of the United States, and the

President and his Cabinet.

Then en

Immediately afterward the Committee of Arrangements was announced. Then came a solemn procession: the casket containing the remains of the dead statesman borne by six officers, and escorted by the Committee of Arrangements of the House and Senate, the pall-bearers and mourners. As the cortege entered, the Chaplain of the Senate, who preceded it, slowly repeated the words:

"I am the resurrection and the life: he that believeth in me,

When the Journal had been read, Senator Sher- though he were dead, yet shall he live,—” man moved to adjourn, and the motion was agreed to without a voice being heard, after a session of only nine minutes. Every one whom I met in the Senaté, and throughout the building, was silent and sad. I soon ascertained the cause. Senator Sumner was dying! It was hard to realize the sad fact. Only the preceding day he had been in the Senate, apparently in the best of spirits; and I

All the people rose reverently to their feet and stood, with bowed heads, while the procession moved slowly to the catafalque in front of the Secretary's desk.

After an impressive pause, the religious services were begun by the Chaplain of the House and the Chaplain of the Senate. After they were con

cluded, the Vice-President pro tempore (Senator Carpenter) said:

“The services appointed to be performed by the Committee of

Arrangements having terminated, the Senate of the United States intrusts the mortal remains of Charles Sumner to its Sergeantat-Arms and a Committee appointed by it, charged with the melancholy duty of conveying them to his home, there to be committed earth to earth, in the soil of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Peace to his ashes!"

The procession again formed, and as it left the Chamber the spectators rose, glancing after it with eyes almost obscured by tears. At three o'clock the funeral train, all draped in black, left the railroad station, while the church-bells of the city tolled mournfully.

The ceremonies reminded me of those I had witnessed at the Capitol just a year before. Yet what a contrast! Then the city was in holiday attire, and the nation rejoiced at the beginning of a new Administration. On this occasion the city was shrouded in the emblems of grief. And, as Senator Anthony feelingly said, "the sad intelligence of the death of this great senator had extended beyond the shores of our own country, arousing profound regret and sympathy wherever humanity weeps for a friend, 'wherever liberty deplores an advocate.""

Upon the death of a senator or representative, it is customary for both Houses to set aside a day for memorial services.' In accordance with this usage, the Senate, on the 27th of April, resolved, "That, as an additional mark of respect to the memory of Charles Sumner, long a senator from Massachusetts, business be now suspended, that the friends and associates of the deceased may pay fitting tribute to his public and private virtues." The House, on the same day, “in sympathy with the action of the Senate," adopted a similar resolution.

I need not dwell upon what was said. Partisan animosities were forgotten, and men of opposite political faiths vied with one another in eulogizing the life and character of the dead senator. The demonstration in Congress was but one of many held throughout the country. At last, every one was able to look calmly and dispassionately upon the deeds of the great senator, and estimate them at their worth. But it had not been so during his career. His independence and fearlessness of thought and action had aroused the fury of all parties; and partisan hate is almost implacable. When Charles Sumner entered upon his duties as a senator, he was treated by his adversaries in the Senate in a manner which violated all the courtesies of that body. He died respected by all, one of the foremost statesmen of the age.

It is not the design nor province of these papers

to criticise political factions or their principles. Parties, like the men composing them, are necessarily fallible; they have their virtues—they have also imperfections. Good, upright citizens entertain opposite political views; and the man of honest convictions, with the courage to express them, - although we may think them erroneous,- is always entitled to our respect.

another.

--

a statesman is

But a politician is one thing The former will favor any party in order to gain personal advantage; the latter will oppose all parties in the maintenance of what he conceives to be right. And it was because Charles Sumner was a statesman, that honorable men of all shades of opinion joined in honoring his memory by testifying to the purity of his motives and the exalted dignity of his life. The sincerity of his convictions none could question; and those familiar with the perils and the opposition he had encountered in their utterance best understood the moral grandeur of his character.

I can not enter into a detailed account of his senatorial life. It is sure to be found in any complete history of his country. I will only say that his first great speech in the Senate, delivered in August, 1852, contained this noble declaration, which was true of his entire public life:

"I HAVE NEVER BEEN A POLITICIAN. THE SLAVE OF PRINCIPLES, I CALL NO PARTY MASTER.” He lived to see the triumph of the principles which he was then advocating in the face of most bitter opposition; and the tribute paid to his memory by his friend and associate, Senator Anthony, was as just as it was eloquent. "His eulogy is his life; his epitaph is the general grief; his monument, builded by his own hands, is the eternal statutes of freedom."

A friend of humanity, his policy was peace, and the settlement of disputes between nations by arbitration instead of by war was one of his fondest dreams. Possessed of such benignant sentiments, on December 2, 1872, he introduced a bill which he requested to have "read in full for information." I shall give it here; for to carry it to the desk was one of my first acts as a page. It was as follows:

"A Bill to regulate the Army Register and the Regimental Colors of the United States.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

The bill was ordered to be printed, and that was the end of its pilgrimage in Congress. It

Upon the termination of the exercises, it is also usual, as a further mark of respect, to adjourn for the day.

never became a law. But it was discussed elsewhere! The Legislature of Massachusetts heard of it with deepest indignation. The act of Senator Sumner was stigmatized as "an attempt to degrade the loyal soldiery of the Union and their grand achievements"; and a resolution of censure was introduced and passed by the legislature of the State which had made him its senator. The men who voted for it could not have known their senator well. His whole life was a contradiction of the charge.

The resolution of censure was an injustice, which would have provoked some men to wrath. But with Mr. Sumner it occasioned not anger but grief. He had served his State for more than twenty years; and it had stood proudly by him in all his efforts. That it should now, after his long and faithful career, misinterpret his motives, and seem to brand him with reproach, was perhaps the saddest blow he had ever sustained. The effect upon him was visible not only to friends but to strangers. His manner betrayed how it bore upon his mind. Yet that session wore away and December appeared, and the senator was again found at

his seat on the opening day, this time to introduce his famous Civil Rights Bill - the first bill of the session. But, as the days slipped by, his face was less frequently seen in the Senate. December, January, February passed — his visits were few and brief.

On the 10th of March, however, he was in attendance. I remember it well. I had not seen him for quite a while, and he called me to his desk. I thought he looked more cheerful than usual, and I asked after his health. As he whittled a pen, he smilingly chatted with me, and stated that he had come to the Senate to hear pleasant news. He had scarcely made the remark, when Senator Boutwell, his colleague, arose and sent up to the clerk's desk to be read a resolution of the Massachusetts Legislature. As the clerk proceeded, all eyes turned upon Senator Sumner who was eagerly listening. It was a resolution rescinding the vote of censure! Within a few moments after the reading, the senator left the Chamber, and, as I parted from him at the door, he shook hands kindly, and said: "Good-bye!" Those were his last words to me. The next day he was dead!

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

And tied a knot at the end She put in her needle, this way and that way:

of her thread;

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

She pushed and she pulled till her fingers bled;

And when she had twisted, and puckered and knotted,

"My doll has a crazy quilt!" she said.

« AnteriorContinuar »