...handeln darf". Vgl. dazu auch US vs. Curtiss Wright aaO (Fn. 162), 320: „Congressional legislation must often accord to the President a degree of discretion and freedom of statutory restriction which would not be admissible were domestic affairs alone involved". 170 Vgl....

...avoid embarrassment and possible damage to American interests in foreign affairs, Congress "... must accord to the President a degree of discretion and...would not be admissible were domestic affairs alone involved." National sovereignty implies that the power to formulate foreign policy must lie only with...

...embarrassment— perhaps serious embarrassment— is to be avoided and success for our aims achieved, congressional legislation which is to be made effective...would not be admissible were domestic affairs alone involved. . . . "Practically every volume of the United States Statutes contains one or more acts or...

...embarrassment — perhaps serious embarrassment — is to be avoided and success lor our aims achieved, congressional legislation which is to be made effective...would not be admissible were domestic affairs alone involved. Moreover, he, not Congress, has the better opportunity of knowing the conditions which prevail...

...for our aims achieved, congressional legislation which is to be made effective through negotiations and inquiry within the international field must often...would not be admissible were domestic affairs alone involved...43 The broad authority of the Executive to block assets and transactions affecting blocked...

...Curtiss-Wright, 299 US 304 (1936), in which Sutherland argues that the "international field must often accord the President a degree of discretion and freedom from...would not be admissible were domestic affairs alone involved." He affirms an 1816 US Senate Foreign Relations Committee assertion that executive "success...

...field of international relations" and that, in the international sphere, the president must be accorded "a degree of discretion and freedom from statutory...would not be admissible were domestic affairs alone involved." United States v. Nixon (1974) The US Supreme Court case dealing with President Richard M....

...authorization in external affairs, but the nature of the enterprise requires the president to be accorded "a degree of discretion and freedom from statutory...would not be admissible were domestic affairs alone involved." No grudging acceptance of presidential power here; the Court went out of its way to expand...

...embrace of the distinction between internal and external affairs. The president, he held, requires "a degree of discretion and freedom from statutory...would not be admissible were domestic affairs alone involved."68 Thus, only when matters are strictly domestic should executive discretion be constrained...

...Constitution." Because the chief executive's powers are so important and sweeping, he concluded, Congress "must often accord to the President a degree of discretion...would not be admissible were domestic affairs alone involved." Thus, although FDR's inveterate critics accused him of grasping for unprecedented power,...