| 1986 - 312 páginas
...challenged under the Supremacy Clause, 'we start with the assumption that the historic police powerr of the States were not to be superseded by the Federal Act unless that was the clear ard manifest purpose of Corgress.'" P.ay v. Atlantic Richfield Co. , 435 US 151, 157 (1978), quoting... | |
| 1989 - 136 páginas
...date, the Justices unanimously articulated this presumption as follows: As we have repeatedly stated, "we start with the assumption that the historic police...unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress." Puerto Rico Department of Consumer Affairs v. Isla Petroleum Corporation, 56 USLW 4307,... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Crime - 1990 - 1282 páginas
...federal review through RICO of state regulatory decision« i« inappropriate. The Supreme Court has said that when Congress legislates in a field traditionally...unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.' This assumption provides assurance that - 45 'the federal-state balance' will not be disturbed... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1990 - 928 páginas
...federal review through RICO of state regulatory decision* is inappropriate. The Supreme Court has said that when Congress legislates in a field traditionally...unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.1 This assumption provide* assurance that - 45 'the federal-state balance1 will not be disturbed... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs - 1990 - 1196 páginas
...a field where there is a long-standing history of state regulation, there is a presumption that the "powers of the States were not to be superseded by...unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.") See United States v. Emmons. 410 US 396, 411 (1973); United States v. Bass. 404 US 336,... | |
| |