...looked to the intent of Congress tod to whether the challenged State law "stands as an obstacle :o the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress." Hiñes v. Davidowitz, 312 US 52, 7/ >7 (1941) . S. 354 declares expressly and unequivocally the init...

...question whether there is an actual conflict between the federal and local ^f laws such that the latter "stands as an obstacle to the, accomplishment and...of the full purposes and objectives of Congress." Perez v. Campbell, 402 Us! 637, 649-50 (1970); Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, supra, 373 US at 141;...

...question -whether there is an actual conflict betveen the federal and local laws such that the latter "stands as an obstacle to the, accomplishment and...of the full purposes and objectives of Congress." Perez v. Campbell, 402 US 637. 649-50 (1970); Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, supra , 373 US at 141;...

...US 52, 67 (1941), that a conflict will exist whenever a state constitutional or statutory provision "stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution...of the full purposes and objectives of Congress." A fair reading of S. 354 and the policies that it implements demonstrates that Congress has "unmistakably...

...US 52, 67 (1941), that a conflict will exist whenever a state constitutional or statutory provision "stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution...of the full purposes and objectives of Congress." A fair reading of S. 354 and the policies that it implements demonstrates that Congress has "unmistakably...

...the Federal statute,"48 where it "frustrates the full effectiveness of Federal law,"49 or where it "stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress."50 The Zoning Board's attempt to prevent construction of a cooling tower is preempted under...

...question vhether there is an actual conflict between the federal and local laws such that the latter "stands as an obstacle to the. accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objective^ of Congress," Perez v. Campbell. 402 US 637, 649-50 (1970); Florida Lime & Avocado Growers,...

...with both state and federal law is impossible, or when the state law 'stands as an obstacle to [,16J the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress. ', California v. ARC America Corp., 490 US 93, 100-01. 104 L. Ed. 2d S6, 109 S. Ct. 1661 (19S9) (citations...

...state common-law claims relating to an area not yet subject to federal regulation would conflict with "the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress." The court made a sharp contrast with the circumstances in Geier, which expressly placed weight on the...

...through criteria set forth by the Supreme Court. The Court held that a state law is preempted if it "stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress [Hines v. Davidowitz. 312 US 52 (1941): Florida Lime & Avocado Growers. Inc. v. Paul. 373 US 132 (1963);...